ROBOTIC AND DIRECT MANUAL LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A COST-ANALYSIS COMPARISON

Aim: The aim of the present study is to address a structured cost analysis by comparing surgical outcomes and costs of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RAS) with the da Vinci Si and Xi, and with direct manual laparoscopy (DML). Methods: Data related to 66 robotic distal pancreatectomies performed at o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Palmeri M, Lorenzoni V, Gianardi D, Furbetta N, Di Franco G, Guadagni S, Bianchini M, Asta VF, Turchetti G, Morelli L
Other Authors: Palmeri, M, Lorenzoni, V, Gianardi, D, Furbetta, N, Di Franco, G, Guadagni, S, Bianchini, M, Asta, Vf, Turchetti, G, Morelli, L
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: 2020
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11568/1066038
id ftunivpisairis:oai:arpi.unipi.it:11568/1066038
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivpisairis:oai:arpi.unipi.it:11568/1066038 2024-04-14T08:10:55+00:00 ROBOTIC AND DIRECT MANUAL LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A COST-ANALYSIS COMPARISON Palmeri M Lorenzoni V Gianardi D Furbetta N Di Franco G Guadagni S Bianchini M Asta VF Turchetti G Morelli L Palmeri, M Lorenzoni, V Gianardi, D Furbetta, N Di Franco, G Guadagni, S Bianchini, M Asta, Vf Turchetti, G Morelli, L 2020 http://hdl.handle.net/11568/1066038 unknown ispartofbook:American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress http://hdl.handle.net/11568/1066038 info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2020 ftunivpisairis 2024-03-21T19:16:38Z Aim: The aim of the present study is to address a structured cost analysis by comparing surgical outcomes and costs of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RAS) with the da Vinci Si and Xi, and with direct manual laparoscopy (DML). Methods: Data related to 66 robotic distal pancreatectomies performed at our Institute with either the da Vinci Si (Si-Rob group) or the da Vinci Xi (Xi-Rob group) from April 2010 to July 2019 and to 26 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (Trad-Lap group) performed between June 2004 and June 2007 were retrospectively collected. We compared these three groups by a propensity score method using age, gender, BMI and ASA risk score as matching variables. Overall costs were compared between groups using generalized linear regression model adjusting for covariates. Results: No differences were found in overall mean operative time between Xi-Rob (243 min) and Si-Rob group (246.4 min) vs Trad-Lap group 277.5 min (p=0.052 and p=0.163). Overall costs associated with Trad-Lap procedures were significantly lower than with Xi-Rob and Si-Rob groups also when adjusting for covariates (p < 0.001); excluding fixed costs, the difference between Trad-Lap and robotic groups resulted no longer statistically significant (p=0.602 and p=0.169 for Si-Rob and Xi-Rob respectively). Conclusions: RAS is more expensive than DML for distal pancreatectomy because of higher acquisition and maintenance costs. The flattening of these differences considering only the variable costs suggests a possible optimization of the cost-effectives of RAS in this setting. Conference Object DML ARPI - Archivio della Ricerca dell'Università di Pisa
institution Open Polar
collection ARPI - Archivio della Ricerca dell'Università di Pisa
op_collection_id ftunivpisairis
language unknown
description Aim: The aim of the present study is to address a structured cost analysis by comparing surgical outcomes and costs of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RAS) with the da Vinci Si and Xi, and with direct manual laparoscopy (DML). Methods: Data related to 66 robotic distal pancreatectomies performed at our Institute with either the da Vinci Si (Si-Rob group) or the da Vinci Xi (Xi-Rob group) from April 2010 to July 2019 and to 26 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (Trad-Lap group) performed between June 2004 and June 2007 were retrospectively collected. We compared these three groups by a propensity score method using age, gender, BMI and ASA risk score as matching variables. Overall costs were compared between groups using generalized linear regression model adjusting for covariates. Results: No differences were found in overall mean operative time between Xi-Rob (243 min) and Si-Rob group (246.4 min) vs Trad-Lap group 277.5 min (p=0.052 and p=0.163). Overall costs associated with Trad-Lap procedures were significantly lower than with Xi-Rob and Si-Rob groups also when adjusting for covariates (p < 0.001); excluding fixed costs, the difference between Trad-Lap and robotic groups resulted no longer statistically significant (p=0.602 and p=0.169 for Si-Rob and Xi-Rob respectively). Conclusions: RAS is more expensive than DML for distal pancreatectomy because of higher acquisition and maintenance costs. The flattening of these differences considering only the variable costs suggests a possible optimization of the cost-effectives of RAS in this setting.
author2 Palmeri, M
Lorenzoni, V
Gianardi, D
Furbetta, N
Di Franco, G
Guadagni, S
Bianchini, M
Asta, Vf
Turchetti, G
Morelli, L
format Conference Object
author Palmeri M
Lorenzoni V
Gianardi D
Furbetta N
Di Franco G
Guadagni S
Bianchini M
Asta VF
Turchetti G
Morelli L
spellingShingle Palmeri M
Lorenzoni V
Gianardi D
Furbetta N
Di Franco G
Guadagni S
Bianchini M
Asta VF
Turchetti G
Morelli L
ROBOTIC AND DIRECT MANUAL LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A COST-ANALYSIS COMPARISON
author_facet Palmeri M
Lorenzoni V
Gianardi D
Furbetta N
Di Franco G
Guadagni S
Bianchini M
Asta VF
Turchetti G
Morelli L
author_sort Palmeri M
title ROBOTIC AND DIRECT MANUAL LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A COST-ANALYSIS COMPARISON
title_short ROBOTIC AND DIRECT MANUAL LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A COST-ANALYSIS COMPARISON
title_full ROBOTIC AND DIRECT MANUAL LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A COST-ANALYSIS COMPARISON
title_fullStr ROBOTIC AND DIRECT MANUAL LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A COST-ANALYSIS COMPARISON
title_full_unstemmed ROBOTIC AND DIRECT MANUAL LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A COST-ANALYSIS COMPARISON
title_sort robotic and direct manual laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a cost-analysis comparison
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/11568/1066038
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_relation ispartofbook:American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress
American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress
http://hdl.handle.net/11568/1066038
_version_ 1796308586332160000