Uncertainties of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment model predictions in North America associated with 3D structure

We quantify GIA prediction uncertainties of 250 1D and 3D Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) models through comparisons with deglacial relative sea-level (RSL) data from North ̇̇ America, and rate of vertical land motion () and gravity-rate-of-change () from GNSS and GRACE data, respectively. Spatia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Li, Tanghua, Wu, Patrick, Wang, Hansheng, Steffen, Holger, Khan, Nicole S., Engelhart, Simon E., Vacchi, Matteo, Shaw, Timothy A., Peltier, W. Richard, Horton, Benjamin P.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Hudson
Hudson Bay
Pacific
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11568/1040281
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087944
Description
Summary:We quantify GIA prediction uncertainties of 250 1D and 3D Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) models through comparisons with deglacial relative sea-level (RSL) data from North ̇̇ America, and rate of vertical land motion () and gravity-rate-of-change () from GNSS and GRACE data, respectively. Spatially, the size of the RSL uncertainties varies across North America with the largest from Hudson Bay and near previous ice margins along the northern Atlantic and Pacific coasts, which suggests 3D viscosity structure in the lower mantle and laterally varying lithospheric thickness. Temporally, RSL uncertainties decrease from the Last Glacial maximum to present except for west of Hudson Bay and the northeastern Pacific coast. The uncertainties of both these regions increase from 30 to 45 m between 15-11 ka BP, which may be due to the rapid decrease of surface loading at that time. Present-day and uncertainties are largest in southwestern Hudson Bay with magnitudes 2.4 mm/yr and 0.4 Gal/yr, mainly due to the 3D viscosity structure in the lower mantle.

Similar Items