Use of Anguilla anguilla for Biomonitoring Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Brackish and Riverine Waters in Central and Southern Italy

• Published in: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
• Main Authors: Bettinetti R, Galassi S, Quadroni S, Volta P, Capoccioni F, Ciccotti E., DE LEO, Giulio
• Other Authors: Bettinetti, R, Galassi, S, Quadroni, S, Volta, P, Capoccioni, F, Ciccotti, E.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2011
• Subjects: Anguilla anguilla; European eel
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/11381/2337348; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0590-y

One of the aims of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/CE is to assess the ecological status of water bodies in Europe in relation to priority contaminants, including some persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Recognizing the benefits of measuring hydrophobic compounds in biota tissues rather than in water, we used the European eel Anguilla anguilla in the present study as a bioindicator species for monitoring POPs in freshwater/brackish environments. We present the results of a contamination analysis of eels carried out in three Italian sites representative of different pollution levels: the last part of Tevere River, which flows through a very urbanized and industrialized area, Caprolace Lake and Lesina Lagoon, inside two different protected national parks. A very high pollution variability was recorded within each group of eels, in particular for those caught at Caprolace Lake. Due to this high variability, inter-population comparisons were carried out only between eels collected in Tevere River and Lesina Lagoon. PCBs values in Lesina Lagoon were two orders of magnitude lower than those measured in Tevere River, while no significant differences were found for levels of DDT compounds. Our results confirm the suitability of the eel as an indicator of persistent bioaccumulative pollutants in brackish environments and rivers where it can be easily caught, but we are sceptical of its use in deep lakes where its capture might be problematic considering standard operation procedures for fish sampling.