Letter from Jos [eph] Le Conte to John Muir, 1880 Oct 6.

No. 6 Sixteenth St., Chicago, Chicago, July 23, I880.Prof. J. LeConte, Dear Sir:Although engaged heavily in the practice of surgery, I have amused myself by studying the boulder drift for many years, being led to it by the digging of ten miles of tunnels through it by Chicago engineers, by the great...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jos eph Le Conte
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Scholarly Commons 1880
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmcl/10590
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/context/jmcl/article/35523/type/native/viewcontent/fullsize.jpg
id ftunivpacificdc:oai:scholarlycommons.pacific.edu:jmcl-35523
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivpacificdc:oai:scholarlycommons.pacific.edu:jmcl-35523 2023-08-27T04:09:38+02:00 Letter from Jos [eph] Le Conte to John Muir, 1880 Oct 6. Jos eph Le Conte 1880-10-06T07:52:58Z image/jpeg https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmcl/10590 https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/context/jmcl/article/35523/type/native/viewcontent/fullsize.jpg eng eng Scholarly Commons https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmcl/10590 https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/context/jmcl/article/35523/type/native/viewcontent/fullsize.jpg Some letters written to John Muir may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.). Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. John Muir Correspondence John Muir correspondence letters author writing naturalist California correspondent mail message post exchange of letters missive notes epistle text 1880 ftunivpacificdc 2023-08-07T20:25:05Z No. 6 Sixteenth St., Chicago, Chicago, July 23, I880.Prof. J. LeConte, Dear Sir:Although engaged heavily in the practice of surgery, I have amused myself by studying the boulder drift for many years, being led to it by the digging of ten miles of tunnels through it by Chicago engineers, by the great number of sections exposed by cuttings on railways centering here, and by the several hundred miles of section on the lake shores kept fresh by the erosion of the waves. I am impressed that most geologists err in consequence of want of sufficient study of drift sections and structure. The result is to impress me with a good deal of surprise at the strange nature of this deposit. Neither of the two prevalent theories conform to all the facts, and I am unable to do any better with Newberry's mixture of the two, nor yet to suggest a third.Excuse my prolixity. Will you do me the favor to ask Mr. John Muir this question?Do modern glaciers in Alaska, or on our Pacific slopes ever plaster down "ground moraines" under themselves? The bearing, of course is on the possibility of accounting for our obscure stratified drift clay by this agency. I have been led to ask this of him because of his marvelous power of observation. By the way, his articles in Scribner are magnificent. In some respects I know of no living writer at all equal to him.The two or three great facts of the boulder drift which refuse to square with the present theories are these.1. The materials are generally stratified, and the higher we go on the crests of the so-called great moraines south of our lakes the more complete and unmistakable the stratification is.2. The forms of the hills are essentially mammelated, and not ridge-form. (Chamberlain's Wisconsin ground plan gives a wildly erroneous idea on that point).3. The stratification is in such tumultuous forms, and has very coarse materials sorted by water and flung often into such steep slopes, as necessitates a supposition of rapid motion in the water, but not like wave action.This is the most perplexing ... Text glaciers Alaska University of the Pacific: Scholarly Commons Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection University of the Pacific: Scholarly Commons
op_collection_id ftunivpacificdc
language English
topic John Muir
correspondence
letters
author
writing
naturalist
California
correspondent
mail
message
post
exchange of letters
missive
notes
epistle
spellingShingle John Muir
correspondence
letters
author
writing
naturalist
California
correspondent
mail
message
post
exchange of letters
missive
notes
epistle
Jos eph Le Conte
Letter from Jos [eph] Le Conte to John Muir, 1880 Oct 6.
topic_facet John Muir
correspondence
letters
author
writing
naturalist
California
correspondent
mail
message
post
exchange of letters
missive
notes
epistle
description No. 6 Sixteenth St., Chicago, Chicago, July 23, I880.Prof. J. LeConte, Dear Sir:Although engaged heavily in the practice of surgery, I have amused myself by studying the boulder drift for many years, being led to it by the digging of ten miles of tunnels through it by Chicago engineers, by the great number of sections exposed by cuttings on railways centering here, and by the several hundred miles of section on the lake shores kept fresh by the erosion of the waves. I am impressed that most geologists err in consequence of want of sufficient study of drift sections and structure. The result is to impress me with a good deal of surprise at the strange nature of this deposit. Neither of the two prevalent theories conform to all the facts, and I am unable to do any better with Newberry's mixture of the two, nor yet to suggest a third.Excuse my prolixity. Will you do me the favor to ask Mr. John Muir this question?Do modern glaciers in Alaska, or on our Pacific slopes ever plaster down "ground moraines" under themselves? The bearing, of course is on the possibility of accounting for our obscure stratified drift clay by this agency. I have been led to ask this of him because of his marvelous power of observation. By the way, his articles in Scribner are magnificent. In some respects I know of no living writer at all equal to him.The two or three great facts of the boulder drift which refuse to square with the present theories are these.1. The materials are generally stratified, and the higher we go on the crests of the so-called great moraines south of our lakes the more complete and unmistakable the stratification is.2. The forms of the hills are essentially mammelated, and not ridge-form. (Chamberlain's Wisconsin ground plan gives a wildly erroneous idea on that point).3. The stratification is in such tumultuous forms, and has very coarse materials sorted by water and flung often into such steep slopes, as necessitates a supposition of rapid motion in the water, but not like wave action.This is the most perplexing ...
format Text
author Jos eph Le Conte
author_facet Jos eph Le Conte
author_sort Jos eph Le Conte
title Letter from Jos [eph] Le Conte to John Muir, 1880 Oct 6.
title_short Letter from Jos [eph] Le Conte to John Muir, 1880 Oct 6.
title_full Letter from Jos [eph] Le Conte to John Muir, 1880 Oct 6.
title_fullStr Letter from Jos [eph] Le Conte to John Muir, 1880 Oct 6.
title_full_unstemmed Letter from Jos [eph] Le Conte to John Muir, 1880 Oct 6.
title_sort letter from jos [eph] le conte to john muir, 1880 oct 6.
publisher Scholarly Commons
publishDate 1880
url https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmcl/10590
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/context/jmcl/article/35523/type/native/viewcontent/fullsize.jpg
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre glaciers
Alaska
genre_facet glaciers
Alaska
op_source John Muir Correspondence
op_relation https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmcl/10590
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/context/jmcl/article/35523/type/native/viewcontent/fullsize.jpg
op_rights Some letters written to John Muir may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.). Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user.
_version_ 1775351160005197824