Viena Karelians as observers of dialect differences in their heritage language

Abstract This article deals with Viena Karelian laypeople’s perceptions and evaluations of dialect. One aim was to determine which dialect features are discussed among laypeople and how laypeople perform in a listening task. The results show that the perceived dialect or language area of White Sea K...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kunnas, N. (Niina)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2018082233897
id ftunivoulu:oai:oulu.fi:nbnfi-fe2018082233897
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivoulu:oai:oulu.fi:nbnfi-fe2018082233897 2023-07-30T04:04:36+02:00 Viena Karelians as observers of dialect differences in their heritage language Kunnas, N. (Niina) 2018 application/pdf http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2018082233897 eng eng Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1235-1938 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution + Noncommercial + NoDerivatives 4.0 license. Copyright is retained by the author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2018 ftunivoulu 2023-07-08T19:56:15Z Abstract This article deals with Viena Karelian laypeople’s perceptions and evaluations of dialect. One aim was to determine which dialect features are discussed among laypeople and how laypeople perform in a listening task. The results show that the perceived dialect or language area of White Sea Karelian is smaller than the dialect area defined by professional linguists. Amongst the respondents, it was commonly thought that White Sea Karelian is spoken only in the Kalevala National District, and that Paanajärvi does not belong to the same dialect area. The listening task showed that the dialect awareness of Viena Karelians is not very high, as even their ‘own’ variety was sometimes incorrectly located. With respect to dialect perceptions, it can be said that differences in vocabulary are readily available and much discussed among Viena Karelians. Laypeople also commented on phonological differences but used colloquial terms such as smooth and hard to describe them. At a phonetic level, the variation between /s/ and /š/ was widely commented on by the informants. They noted that speakers of White Sea Karelian make more extensive use of /š/ whereas in the southern varieties of Karelian /s/ is more common. The speakers of White Sea Karelian were perceived to ‘lisp’ or ‘speak with š’, and speakers of other varieties were said to use a sharper /s/. According to this study, there is a perceptual connection between the form (extensive use of /š/) and the group identified as using it (speakers of White Sea Karelian). Article in Journal/Newspaper karelian karelians White Sea Jultika - University of Oulu repository White Sea
institution Open Polar
collection Jultika - University of Oulu repository
op_collection_id ftunivoulu
language English
description Abstract This article deals with Viena Karelian laypeople’s perceptions and evaluations of dialect. One aim was to determine which dialect features are discussed among laypeople and how laypeople perform in a listening task. The results show that the perceived dialect or language area of White Sea Karelian is smaller than the dialect area defined by professional linguists. Amongst the respondents, it was commonly thought that White Sea Karelian is spoken only in the Kalevala National District, and that Paanajärvi does not belong to the same dialect area. The listening task showed that the dialect awareness of Viena Karelians is not very high, as even their ‘own’ variety was sometimes incorrectly located. With respect to dialect perceptions, it can be said that differences in vocabulary are readily available and much discussed among Viena Karelians. Laypeople also commented on phonological differences but used colloquial terms such as smooth and hard to describe them. At a phonetic level, the variation between /s/ and /š/ was widely commented on by the informants. They noted that speakers of White Sea Karelian make more extensive use of /š/ whereas in the southern varieties of Karelian /s/ is more common. The speakers of White Sea Karelian were perceived to ‘lisp’ or ‘speak with š’, and speakers of other varieties were said to use a sharper /s/. According to this study, there is a perceptual connection between the form (extensive use of /š/) and the group identified as using it (speakers of White Sea Karelian).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kunnas, N. (Niina)
spellingShingle Kunnas, N. (Niina)
Viena Karelians as observers of dialect differences in their heritage language
author_facet Kunnas, N. (Niina)
author_sort Kunnas, N. (Niina)
title Viena Karelians as observers of dialect differences in their heritage language
title_short Viena Karelians as observers of dialect differences in their heritage language
title_full Viena Karelians as observers of dialect differences in their heritage language
title_fullStr Viena Karelians as observers of dialect differences in their heritage language
title_full_unstemmed Viena Karelians as observers of dialect differences in their heritage language
title_sort viena karelians as observers of dialect differences in their heritage language
publisher Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura
publishDate 2018
url http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2018082233897
geographic White Sea
geographic_facet White Sea
genre karelian
karelians
White Sea
genre_facet karelian
karelians
White Sea
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1235-1938
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution + Noncommercial + NoDerivatives 4.0 license. Copyright is retained by the author(s).
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
_version_ 1772816154024214528