Pohjois- ja Itä-Suomen elinkeinojen kehittäminen suomalaisen yhteiskunnan murroksessa:suurimpien puolueiden elinkeinopolitiikka 1951–1970

• Main Author: Leiviskä, J. (Janne)
• Other Authors: Vahtola, J. (Jouko)
• Format: Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
• Language: Finnish
• Published: Oulun yliopisto 2011
• Subjects: Agrarian League; Centre Party; Coalition Party; North Karelia; Northern Finland; agriculture; industry; migration; reconstruction; regional policy; structural change; underdeveloped areas; Pohjois-Karjala; Pohjois-Suomi; aluepolitiikka; jälleenrakennus; kehitysalueet; keskustapuolue; kokoomus; maalaisliitto; maatalous; muuttoliike; rakennemuutos; teollisuus; SDP; SKDL; SKP; yöpakkaset; karelia*
• Online Access: http://urn.fi/urn:isbn:9789514295539

Abstract I analysed Finnish parties’ policies for developing sources of livelihood in Northern and Eastern Finland in 1951–1970. I used the minutes of the main organs of four parties — the Agrarian League/Centre Party, the Coalition Party, SKDL and SDP — as source material. Parliamentary documents were another important source. After World War II, Finnish society had to adapt to peacetime demands. To quickly provide productive work for people and to achieve self-sufficiency in food production as soon as possible, industrial policy embraced expansion of agriculture. As the 1950s arrived it was noticed that the new small farms were unable to support the growing rural population. Thus, an attempt was made to diversify rural sources of livelihood. At the same time, the parties competed earnestly for rural votes, turning this into a very political question. With the exception of the Agrarian League, the parties put forth new programmes in preparing for the 1958 election, which formed a turning point. After the election, a coalition cabinet — Fagerholm’s Cabinet III — was formed; it then had to resign due to foreign political pressure. After the so-called yöpakkaset crisis, the most important criterion of cabinet eligibility in Finnish government politics was that the party had to have the approval of the Soviet Union. Thereafter the parties were no longer able to cooperate in developing rural areas. The parties were in agreement that rural sources of livelihood had to be developed in order to employ Finland’s growing population. They were unable to agree on how this should happen in practice. The Agrarian League sought to develop rural areas through agriculture, small industry and the wood processing industry. SDP raised industrialisation as the main employment alternative. Un-fortunately, because of questions concerning persons, the party split into two competing camps. SKDL supported increasing state-run industry and foreign trade with the Soviet Union. The Coalition Party was for entrepreneurship and trade ...