The drive for citizenship: Impacts of Bill C-31 membership model, 1985-1996

Bill C-31, an Act to Amend the Indian Act, was passed by the Canadian Parliament on June 28, 1985. It was intended to bring the Indian Act into line with the provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in part by allowing the reinstatement of Indian Status to women who had lost it aft...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ward, John T
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Ottawa (Canada) 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10393/28114
https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-12393
id ftunivottawa:oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/28114
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivottawa:oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/28114 2023-05-15T16:17:14+02:00 The drive for citizenship: Impacts of Bill C-31 membership model, 1985-1996 Ward, John T 2009 132 p. application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10393/28114 https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-12393 en eng University of Ottawa (Canada) Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-01, page: 0168. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/28114 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-12393 History Canadian Native American Studies Thesis 2009 ftunivottawa https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-12393 2021-01-04T17:09:22Z Bill C-31, an Act to Amend the Indian Act, was passed by the Canadian Parliament on June 28, 1985. It was intended to bring the Indian Act into line with the provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in part by allowing the reinstatement of Indian Status to women who had lost it after marrying non-Aboriginal or non-Status men. It followed from the efforts of Native women Jeannette Lavell and Sandra Lovelace in court appeals over sexual discrimination in the Indian Act. Yet there were many negative reactions to the bill. Bill C-31 introduced rules governing who could be registered as "Indian." It also contained new rules with respect to children born on or after April 17, 1985. This paper argues that these rules discriminate against children with one parent who is not recognized as "Indian" under the new rules. The primary purpose of the bill was to allow Aboriginal people to create their own criteria for managing the membership of bands. However, it caused a number of conflicts and failed to produce the results Aboriginal community hoped for. There were concerns about the increase in the Aboriginal population as people returned to reserves and inadequate funding to meet the needs arising from such population growth. Many Native persons viewed the bill as a mechanism for assimilation and argued that they should have sole responsibility over the regulation of their own memberships. Recent research on Bill C-31 is limited, in that many authors ignore the personal experiences of those who helped create and were affected by the legislation. For the most part, the literature tends to stress the growth of the Native population following the bill's implementation. A more thorough analysis would yield a greater understanding of the bill's impact on First Nations rights and self-determination. This thesis will incorporate an array of primary sources, including summary reports, scholarly studies, statistics, interviews and personal commentaries. An analysis of secondary sources will also reveal the current state of research on the topic, and show how this thesis provides a new perspective by considering matrimonial real property, blood quantum, court cases and legal Status. Thesis First Nations uO Research (University of Ottawa - uOttawa) Indian
institution Open Polar
collection uO Research (University of Ottawa - uOttawa)
op_collection_id ftunivottawa
language English
topic History
Canadian
Native American Studies
spellingShingle History
Canadian
Native American Studies
Ward, John T
The drive for citizenship: Impacts of Bill C-31 membership model, 1985-1996
topic_facet History
Canadian
Native American Studies
description Bill C-31, an Act to Amend the Indian Act, was passed by the Canadian Parliament on June 28, 1985. It was intended to bring the Indian Act into line with the provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in part by allowing the reinstatement of Indian Status to women who had lost it after marrying non-Aboriginal or non-Status men. It followed from the efforts of Native women Jeannette Lavell and Sandra Lovelace in court appeals over sexual discrimination in the Indian Act. Yet there were many negative reactions to the bill. Bill C-31 introduced rules governing who could be registered as "Indian." It also contained new rules with respect to children born on or after April 17, 1985. This paper argues that these rules discriminate against children with one parent who is not recognized as "Indian" under the new rules. The primary purpose of the bill was to allow Aboriginal people to create their own criteria for managing the membership of bands. However, it caused a number of conflicts and failed to produce the results Aboriginal community hoped for. There were concerns about the increase in the Aboriginal population as people returned to reserves and inadequate funding to meet the needs arising from such population growth. Many Native persons viewed the bill as a mechanism for assimilation and argued that they should have sole responsibility over the regulation of their own memberships. Recent research on Bill C-31 is limited, in that many authors ignore the personal experiences of those who helped create and were affected by the legislation. For the most part, the literature tends to stress the growth of the Native population following the bill's implementation. A more thorough analysis would yield a greater understanding of the bill's impact on First Nations rights and self-determination. This thesis will incorporate an array of primary sources, including summary reports, scholarly studies, statistics, interviews and personal commentaries. An analysis of secondary sources will also reveal the current state of research on the topic, and show how this thesis provides a new perspective by considering matrimonial real property, blood quantum, court cases and legal Status.
format Thesis
author Ward, John T
author_facet Ward, John T
author_sort Ward, John T
title The drive for citizenship: Impacts of Bill C-31 membership model, 1985-1996
title_short The drive for citizenship: Impacts of Bill C-31 membership model, 1985-1996
title_full The drive for citizenship: Impacts of Bill C-31 membership model, 1985-1996
title_fullStr The drive for citizenship: Impacts of Bill C-31 membership model, 1985-1996
title_full_unstemmed The drive for citizenship: Impacts of Bill C-31 membership model, 1985-1996
title_sort drive for citizenship: impacts of bill c-31 membership model, 1985-1996
publisher University of Ottawa (Canada)
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10393/28114
https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-12393
geographic Indian
geographic_facet Indian
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-01, page: 0168.
http://hdl.handle.net/10393/28114
http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-12393
op_doi https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-12393
_version_ 1766003079160791040