Arctic Council Soft Law: An Effectiveness Analysis

Increased hydrocarbon exploitation within the Arctic combined with recent oil spill disasters have increased the importance of ensuring the existence of adequate oil and gas regulations. Currently, the only Arctic specific oil and gas regulatory mechanism is the Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guideline...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Valk, Nathaniel Pieter
Other Authors: Gheciu, Alexandra
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10393/23877
id ftunivottawa:oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/23877
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivottawa:oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/23877 2023-05-15T14:30:45+02:00 Arctic Council Soft Law: An Effectiveness Analysis Valk, Nathaniel Pieter Gheciu, Alexandra 2012 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10393/23877 en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10393/23877 2012 ftunivottawa 2021-01-04T17:08:12Z Increased hydrocarbon exploitation within the Arctic combined with recent oil spill disasters have increased the importance of ensuring the existence of adequate oil and gas regulations. Currently, the only Arctic specific oil and gas regulatory mechanism is the Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines (AOOGG) – a soft-law mechanism developed within the Arctic Council. Given the fragileness of the Arctic ecosystem, ensuring that the AOOGG is effective in its goal of protecting the Arctic environment is paramount. Analyzing the effectiveness of the Council can be done by assessing how it develops state concern, promotes a contractual environment, and builds state capacity. As it is currently structured, the Council’s soft-law framework is ineffective. Lacking compliance and review mechanisms, the Council fails to effectively develop state concern or create a contractual environment. The Council, however, has relatively effective capacity building mechanisms. Improving the effectiveness of the Council would not come from developing binding hard--‐law. Rather improvements can be made through the development of review mechanisms. These would serve to increase state concern for oil and gas regulation in the Arctic, as well as improve the AOOGG. Review mechanisms would further develop the AOOGG’s normative niche, promoting attention to norms that the AOOGG advances. Improvements could also be made by developing a clearing-house of information that could improve the capacity of states to implement and promote oil and gas guidelines. This would promote the dissemination of best available technology. Other/Unknown Material Arctic Council Arctic uO Research (University of Ottawa - uOttawa) Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection uO Research (University of Ottawa - uOttawa)
op_collection_id ftunivottawa
language English
description Increased hydrocarbon exploitation within the Arctic combined with recent oil spill disasters have increased the importance of ensuring the existence of adequate oil and gas regulations. Currently, the only Arctic specific oil and gas regulatory mechanism is the Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines (AOOGG) – a soft-law mechanism developed within the Arctic Council. Given the fragileness of the Arctic ecosystem, ensuring that the AOOGG is effective in its goal of protecting the Arctic environment is paramount. Analyzing the effectiveness of the Council can be done by assessing how it develops state concern, promotes a contractual environment, and builds state capacity. As it is currently structured, the Council’s soft-law framework is ineffective. Lacking compliance and review mechanisms, the Council fails to effectively develop state concern or create a contractual environment. The Council, however, has relatively effective capacity building mechanisms. Improving the effectiveness of the Council would not come from developing binding hard--‐law. Rather improvements can be made through the development of review mechanisms. These would serve to increase state concern for oil and gas regulation in the Arctic, as well as improve the AOOGG. Review mechanisms would further develop the AOOGG’s normative niche, promoting attention to norms that the AOOGG advances. Improvements could also be made by developing a clearing-house of information that could improve the capacity of states to implement and promote oil and gas guidelines. This would promote the dissemination of best available technology.
author2 Gheciu, Alexandra
author Valk, Nathaniel Pieter
spellingShingle Valk, Nathaniel Pieter
Arctic Council Soft Law: An Effectiveness Analysis
author_facet Valk, Nathaniel Pieter
author_sort Valk, Nathaniel Pieter
title Arctic Council Soft Law: An Effectiveness Analysis
title_short Arctic Council Soft Law: An Effectiveness Analysis
title_full Arctic Council Soft Law: An Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr Arctic Council Soft Law: An Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Arctic Council Soft Law: An Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort arctic council soft law: an effectiveness analysis
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10393/23877
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic Council
Arctic
genre_facet Arctic Council
Arctic
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10393/23877
_version_ 1766304574517280768