Federal/provincial disputes, natural resources and the Treaty no. 3 Ojibway, 1867-1924.

This dissertation argues that the Ontario-Manitoba Boundary Dispute (1870-1889) and its aftermath limited the ability of the Ojibway of northwestern Ontario to maintain and develop their interests in the lands and resources to which they were entitled by the terms of Treaty #3, signed in 1873. In pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cottam, S. Barry.
Other Authors: Jaenen, Cornelius J.
Format: Thesis
Language:unknown
Published: University of Ottawa (Canada) 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10393/10060
https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-16635
id ftunivottawa:oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/10060
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivottawa:oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/10060 2023-05-15T16:16:58+02:00 Federal/provincial disputes, natural resources and the Treaty no. 3 Ojibway, 1867-1924. Cottam, S. Barry. Jaenen, Cornelius J. 1995 324 p. application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10393/10060 https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-16635 unknown University of Ottawa (Canada) Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02, Section: A, page: 0817. 9780612048706 http://hdl.handle.net/10393/10060 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-16635 History Canadian Thesis 1995 ftunivottawa https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-16635 2021-01-04T17:05:45Z This dissertation argues that the Ontario-Manitoba Boundary Dispute (1870-1889) and its aftermath limited the ability of the Ojibway of northwestern Ontario to maintain and develop their interests in the lands and resources to which they were entitled by the terms of Treaty #3, signed in 1873. In particular, their rights to the mineral and timber resources on their reserves were threatened. Furthermore, once the Boundary Dispute was resolved in favour of Ontario, their reserve lands were found to be in the province, which therefore gained the right to confirm the reserves. Continuing disputes between the province and the Dominion resulting from this retroactive decision delayed this confirmation until 1915. Once the reserves were confirmed, however, the nature of the Indian interest in them prior to 1915 was questioned by the province. In this and other ways, the fiduciary responsibilities of the federal government toward the Ojibway were encroached upon by the province of Ontario. The governments and individuals involved in the lawsuits generated by the Boundary Dispute overlooked the fate of an increasingly marginalized and politically inconsequential group in the pursuit of their own agendas and interests. The courts squeezed the concepts of Aboriginal title to the land and its resources into narrow nineteenth century perceptions that still limit the rights of First Nations peoples. Placing these cases, in particular the "Indian Titles" case, R. v. St. Catharines Milling & Lumber Co., and its 'corollary', Ontario Mining Company v. Seybold et al., into their historical context contributes to understanding the complex problems still faced by the Ojibway of Treaty #3. The dissertation concludes with an exploration of the continuing attempts made by the Ojibway to assert their rights in light of these events. Thesis First Nations uO Research (University of Ottawa - uOttawa) Indian
institution Open Polar
collection uO Research (University of Ottawa - uOttawa)
op_collection_id ftunivottawa
language unknown
topic History
Canadian
spellingShingle History
Canadian
Cottam, S. Barry.
Federal/provincial disputes, natural resources and the Treaty no. 3 Ojibway, 1867-1924.
topic_facet History
Canadian
description This dissertation argues that the Ontario-Manitoba Boundary Dispute (1870-1889) and its aftermath limited the ability of the Ojibway of northwestern Ontario to maintain and develop their interests in the lands and resources to which they were entitled by the terms of Treaty #3, signed in 1873. In particular, their rights to the mineral and timber resources on their reserves were threatened. Furthermore, once the Boundary Dispute was resolved in favour of Ontario, their reserve lands were found to be in the province, which therefore gained the right to confirm the reserves. Continuing disputes between the province and the Dominion resulting from this retroactive decision delayed this confirmation until 1915. Once the reserves were confirmed, however, the nature of the Indian interest in them prior to 1915 was questioned by the province. In this and other ways, the fiduciary responsibilities of the federal government toward the Ojibway were encroached upon by the province of Ontario. The governments and individuals involved in the lawsuits generated by the Boundary Dispute overlooked the fate of an increasingly marginalized and politically inconsequential group in the pursuit of their own agendas and interests. The courts squeezed the concepts of Aboriginal title to the land and its resources into narrow nineteenth century perceptions that still limit the rights of First Nations peoples. Placing these cases, in particular the "Indian Titles" case, R. v. St. Catharines Milling & Lumber Co., and its 'corollary', Ontario Mining Company v. Seybold et al., into their historical context contributes to understanding the complex problems still faced by the Ojibway of Treaty #3. The dissertation concludes with an exploration of the continuing attempts made by the Ojibway to assert their rights in light of these events.
author2 Jaenen, Cornelius J.
format Thesis
author Cottam, S. Barry.
author_facet Cottam, S. Barry.
author_sort Cottam, S. Barry.
title Federal/provincial disputes, natural resources and the Treaty no. 3 Ojibway, 1867-1924.
title_short Federal/provincial disputes, natural resources and the Treaty no. 3 Ojibway, 1867-1924.
title_full Federal/provincial disputes, natural resources and the Treaty no. 3 Ojibway, 1867-1924.
title_fullStr Federal/provincial disputes, natural resources and the Treaty no. 3 Ojibway, 1867-1924.
title_full_unstemmed Federal/provincial disputes, natural resources and the Treaty no. 3 Ojibway, 1867-1924.
title_sort federal/provincial disputes, natural resources and the treaty no. 3 ojibway, 1867-1924.
publisher University of Ottawa (Canada)
publishDate 1995
url http://hdl.handle.net/10393/10060
https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-16635
geographic Indian
geographic_facet Indian
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02, Section: A, page: 0817.
9780612048706
http://hdl.handle.net/10393/10060
http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-16635
op_doi https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-16635
_version_ 1766002823698317312