Geomechanical response of permafrost-associated hydrate deposits to depressurization-induced gas production

In this simulation study, we analyzed the geomechanical response during depressurization production from two known hydrate-bearing permafrost deposits: the Mallik (Northwest Territories, Canada) deposit and Mount Elbert (Alaska, USA) deposit. Gas was produced from these deposits at constant pressure...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Main Authors: Rutqvist, J., Moridis, G.J., Grover, T., Collett, T.
Other Authors: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Earth Sciences Division.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2009
Subjects:
58
54
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.02.013
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc932396/
id ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc932396
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc932396 2023-05-15T17:46:45+02:00 Geomechanical response of permafrost-associated hydrate deposits to depressurization-induced gas production Rutqvist, J. Moridis, G.J. Grover, T. Collett, T. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Earth Sciences Division. 2009-02-01 Text https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.02.013 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc932396/ English eng Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory rep-no: LBNL-1614E grantno: DE-AC02-05CH11231 doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2009.02.013 osti: 953689 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc932396/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc932396 Journal Name: Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering; Related Information: Journal Publication Date: 2009 Canada 58 Sediments Layers 54 Zones Deposits Hydrates Simulation Wells Thermodynamics Depth Production Failures Stresses Overburden Depressurization Dissociation Permafrost Shear Alaska Article 2009 ftunivnotexas https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.02.013 2017-09-30T22:08:02Z In this simulation study, we analyzed the geomechanical response during depressurization production from two known hydrate-bearing permafrost deposits: the Mallik (Northwest Territories, Canada) deposit and Mount Elbert (Alaska, USA) deposit. Gas was produced from these deposits at constant pressure using horizontal wells placed at the top of a hydrate layer (HL), located at a depth of about 900 m at the Mallik and 600 m at the Mount Elbert. The simulation results show that general thermodynamic and geomechanical responses are similar for the two sites, but with substantially higher production and more intensive geomechanical responses at the deeper Mallik deposit. The depressurization-induced dissociation begins at the well bore and then spreads laterally, mainly along the top of the HL. The depressurization results in an increased shear stress within the body of the receding hydrate and causes a vertical compaction of the reservoir. However, its effects are partially mitigated by the relatively stiff permafrost overburden, and compaction of the HL is limited to less than 0.4%. The increased shear stress may lead to shear failure in the hydrate-free zone bounded by the HL overburden and the downward-receding upper dissociation interface. This zone undergoes complete hydrate dissociation, and the cohesive strength of the sediment is low. We determined that the likelihood of shear failure depends on the initial stress state as well as on the geomechanical properties of the reservoir. The Poisson's ratio of the hydrate-bearing formation is a particularly important parameter that determines whether the evolution of the reservoir stresses will increase or decrease the likelihood of shear failure. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northwest Territories permafrost Alaska University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library Canada Northwest Territories Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 67 1-2 1 12
institution Open Polar
collection University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivnotexas
language English
topic Canada
58
Sediments
Layers
54
Zones
Deposits
Hydrates
Simulation
Wells
Thermodynamics
Depth
Production
Failures
Stresses
Overburden
Depressurization
Dissociation
Permafrost
Shear
Alaska
spellingShingle Canada
58
Sediments
Layers
54
Zones
Deposits
Hydrates
Simulation
Wells
Thermodynamics
Depth
Production
Failures
Stresses
Overburden
Depressurization
Dissociation
Permafrost
Shear
Alaska
Rutqvist, J.
Moridis, G.J.
Grover, T.
Collett, T.
Geomechanical response of permafrost-associated hydrate deposits to depressurization-induced gas production
topic_facet Canada
58
Sediments
Layers
54
Zones
Deposits
Hydrates
Simulation
Wells
Thermodynamics
Depth
Production
Failures
Stresses
Overburden
Depressurization
Dissociation
Permafrost
Shear
Alaska
description In this simulation study, we analyzed the geomechanical response during depressurization production from two known hydrate-bearing permafrost deposits: the Mallik (Northwest Territories, Canada) deposit and Mount Elbert (Alaska, USA) deposit. Gas was produced from these deposits at constant pressure using horizontal wells placed at the top of a hydrate layer (HL), located at a depth of about 900 m at the Mallik and 600 m at the Mount Elbert. The simulation results show that general thermodynamic and geomechanical responses are similar for the two sites, but with substantially higher production and more intensive geomechanical responses at the deeper Mallik deposit. The depressurization-induced dissociation begins at the well bore and then spreads laterally, mainly along the top of the HL. The depressurization results in an increased shear stress within the body of the receding hydrate and causes a vertical compaction of the reservoir. However, its effects are partially mitigated by the relatively stiff permafrost overburden, and compaction of the HL is limited to less than 0.4%. The increased shear stress may lead to shear failure in the hydrate-free zone bounded by the HL overburden and the downward-receding upper dissociation interface. This zone undergoes complete hydrate dissociation, and the cohesive strength of the sediment is low. We determined that the likelihood of shear failure depends on the initial stress state as well as on the geomechanical properties of the reservoir. The Poisson's ratio of the hydrate-bearing formation is a particularly important parameter that determines whether the evolution of the reservoir stresses will increase or decrease the likelihood of shear failure.
author2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Earth Sciences Division.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rutqvist, J.
Moridis, G.J.
Grover, T.
Collett, T.
author_facet Rutqvist, J.
Moridis, G.J.
Grover, T.
Collett, T.
author_sort Rutqvist, J.
title Geomechanical response of permafrost-associated hydrate deposits to depressurization-induced gas production
title_short Geomechanical response of permafrost-associated hydrate deposits to depressurization-induced gas production
title_full Geomechanical response of permafrost-associated hydrate deposits to depressurization-induced gas production
title_fullStr Geomechanical response of permafrost-associated hydrate deposits to depressurization-induced gas production
title_full_unstemmed Geomechanical response of permafrost-associated hydrate deposits to depressurization-induced gas production
title_sort geomechanical response of permafrost-associated hydrate deposits to depressurization-induced gas production
publisher Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
publishDate 2009
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.02.013
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc932396/
geographic Canada
Northwest Territories
geographic_facet Canada
Northwest Territories
genre Northwest Territories
permafrost
Alaska
genre_facet Northwest Territories
permafrost
Alaska
op_source Journal Name: Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering; Related Information: Journal Publication Date: 2009
op_relation rep-no: LBNL-1614E
grantno: DE-AC02-05CH11231
doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2009.02.013
osti: 953689
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc932396/
ark: ark:/67531/metadc932396
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.02.013
container_title Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
container_volume 67
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 12
_version_ 1766150593047429120