Four Critical Needs to Change the Hydrate Energy Paradigm from Assessment to Production: The 2007 Report to Congress by the U.S. Federal methane Hydrate Advisory Committee
This work summarizes a two-year study by the U.S. Federal Methane Hydrate Advisory Committee recommending the future needs for federally-supported hydrate research. The Report was submitted to the US Congress on August 14, 2007 and includes four recommendations regarding (a) permafrost hydrate produ...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Brookhaven National Laboratory
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc929376/ |
id |
ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc929376 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc929376 2023-05-15T17:12:01+02:00 Four Critical Needs to Change the Hydrate Energy Paradigm from Assessment to Production: The 2007 Report to Congress by the U.S. Federal methane Hydrate Advisory Committee Mahajan,D. Sloan, D. Brewer, P. Dutta, N. Johnson, A. Jones, E. Juenger, K. Kastner, M. Masutani, S. Swenson, R. Whelan, J. Wilson, s. Woolsey, R. United States. Department of Energy. 2009-03-11 Text http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc929376/ English eng Brookhaven National Laboratory rep-no: BNL--82182-2009-CP grantno: DE-AC02-98CH10886 osti: 952233 http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc929376/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc929376 Offshore Technology Conference 2008 (OTC08); Houston, TX; 20080505 through 20080508 International Cooperation Fuel Oils Hydrates Gas Hydrates Testing Electric Power Natural Gas Coal 01 Coal Lignite And Peat Methane 03 Natural Gas Fossil Fuels Permafrost 02 Petroleum Greenhouse Effect Climates Market Viability 29 Energy Planning Policy And Economy Liquefied Natural Gas Advisory Committees Energy Policy Article 2009 ftunivnotexas 2016-12-10T23:07:46Z This work summarizes a two-year study by the U.S. Federal Methane Hydrate Advisory Committee recommending the future needs for federally-supported hydrate research. The Report was submitted to the US Congress on August 14, 2007 and includes four recommendations regarding (a) permafrost hydrate production testing, (b) marine hydrate viability assessment (c) climate effect of hydrates, and (d) international cooperation. A secure supply of natural gas is a vital goal of the U.S. national energy policy because natural gas is the cleanest and most widely used of all fossil fuels. The inherent cleanliness of natural gas, with the lowest CO2 emission per unit of heat energy of any fossil fuel, means substituting gas for coal and fuel oil will reduce emissions that can exacerbate the greenhouse effect. Both a fuel and a feedstock, a secure and reasonably priced supply of natural gas is important to industry, electric power generators, large and small commercial enterprises, and homeowners. Because each volume of solid gas hydrate contains as much as 164 standard volumes of methane, hydrates can be viewed as a concentrated form of natural gas equivalent to compressed gas but less concentrated than liquefied natural gas (LNG). Natural hydrate accumulations worldwide are estimated to contain 700,000 TCF of natural gas, of which 200,000 TCF are located within the United States. Compared with the current national annual consumption of 22 TCF, this estimate of in-place gas in enormous. Clearly, if only a fraction of the hydrated methane is recoverable, hydrates could constitute a substantial component of the future energy portfolio of the Nation (Figure 1). However, recovery poses a major technical and commercial challenge. Such numbers have sparked interest in natural gas hydrates as a potential, long-term source of energy, as well as concerns about any potential impact the release of methane from hydrates might have on the environment. Energy-hungry countries such as India and Japan are outspending the United States on hydrate science and engineering R&D by a factor of 10, and may bring this resource to market as much as a decade before the United States. Article in Journal/Newspaper Methane hydrate permafrost University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library |
op_collection_id |
ftunivnotexas |
language |
English |
topic |
International Cooperation Fuel Oils Hydrates Gas Hydrates Testing Electric Power Natural Gas Coal 01 Coal Lignite And Peat Methane 03 Natural Gas Fossil Fuels Permafrost 02 Petroleum Greenhouse Effect Climates Market Viability 29 Energy Planning Policy And Economy Liquefied Natural Gas Advisory Committees Energy Policy |
spellingShingle |
International Cooperation Fuel Oils Hydrates Gas Hydrates Testing Electric Power Natural Gas Coal 01 Coal Lignite And Peat Methane 03 Natural Gas Fossil Fuels Permafrost 02 Petroleum Greenhouse Effect Climates Market Viability 29 Energy Planning Policy And Economy Liquefied Natural Gas Advisory Committees Energy Policy Mahajan,D. Sloan, D. Brewer, P. Dutta, N. Johnson, A. Jones, E. Juenger, K. Kastner, M. Masutani, S. Swenson, R. Whelan, J. Wilson, s. Woolsey, R. Four Critical Needs to Change the Hydrate Energy Paradigm from Assessment to Production: The 2007 Report to Congress by the U.S. Federal methane Hydrate Advisory Committee |
topic_facet |
International Cooperation Fuel Oils Hydrates Gas Hydrates Testing Electric Power Natural Gas Coal 01 Coal Lignite And Peat Methane 03 Natural Gas Fossil Fuels Permafrost 02 Petroleum Greenhouse Effect Climates Market Viability 29 Energy Planning Policy And Economy Liquefied Natural Gas Advisory Committees Energy Policy |
description |
This work summarizes a two-year study by the U.S. Federal Methane Hydrate Advisory Committee recommending the future needs for federally-supported hydrate research. The Report was submitted to the US Congress on August 14, 2007 and includes four recommendations regarding (a) permafrost hydrate production testing, (b) marine hydrate viability assessment (c) climate effect of hydrates, and (d) international cooperation. A secure supply of natural gas is a vital goal of the U.S. national energy policy because natural gas is the cleanest and most widely used of all fossil fuels. The inherent cleanliness of natural gas, with the lowest CO2 emission per unit of heat energy of any fossil fuel, means substituting gas for coal and fuel oil will reduce emissions that can exacerbate the greenhouse effect. Both a fuel and a feedstock, a secure and reasonably priced supply of natural gas is important to industry, electric power generators, large and small commercial enterprises, and homeowners. Because each volume of solid gas hydrate contains as much as 164 standard volumes of methane, hydrates can be viewed as a concentrated form of natural gas equivalent to compressed gas but less concentrated than liquefied natural gas (LNG). Natural hydrate accumulations worldwide are estimated to contain 700,000 TCF of natural gas, of which 200,000 TCF are located within the United States. Compared with the current national annual consumption of 22 TCF, this estimate of in-place gas in enormous. Clearly, if only a fraction of the hydrated methane is recoverable, hydrates could constitute a substantial component of the future energy portfolio of the Nation (Figure 1). However, recovery poses a major technical and commercial challenge. Such numbers have sparked interest in natural gas hydrates as a potential, long-term source of energy, as well as concerns about any potential impact the release of methane from hydrates might have on the environment. Energy-hungry countries such as India and Japan are outspending the United States on hydrate science and engineering R&D by a factor of 10, and may bring this resource to market as much as a decade before the United States. |
author2 |
United States. Department of Energy. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Mahajan,D. Sloan, D. Brewer, P. Dutta, N. Johnson, A. Jones, E. Juenger, K. Kastner, M. Masutani, S. Swenson, R. Whelan, J. Wilson, s. Woolsey, R. |
author_facet |
Mahajan,D. Sloan, D. Brewer, P. Dutta, N. Johnson, A. Jones, E. Juenger, K. Kastner, M. Masutani, S. Swenson, R. Whelan, J. Wilson, s. Woolsey, R. |
author_sort |
Mahajan,D. |
title |
Four Critical Needs to Change the Hydrate Energy Paradigm from Assessment to Production: The 2007 Report to Congress by the U.S. Federal methane Hydrate Advisory Committee |
title_short |
Four Critical Needs to Change the Hydrate Energy Paradigm from Assessment to Production: The 2007 Report to Congress by the U.S. Federal methane Hydrate Advisory Committee |
title_full |
Four Critical Needs to Change the Hydrate Energy Paradigm from Assessment to Production: The 2007 Report to Congress by the U.S. Federal methane Hydrate Advisory Committee |
title_fullStr |
Four Critical Needs to Change the Hydrate Energy Paradigm from Assessment to Production: The 2007 Report to Congress by the U.S. Federal methane Hydrate Advisory Committee |
title_full_unstemmed |
Four Critical Needs to Change the Hydrate Energy Paradigm from Assessment to Production: The 2007 Report to Congress by the U.S. Federal methane Hydrate Advisory Committee |
title_sort |
four critical needs to change the hydrate energy paradigm from assessment to production: the 2007 report to congress by the u.s. federal methane hydrate advisory committee |
publisher |
Brookhaven National Laboratory |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc929376/ |
genre |
Methane hydrate permafrost |
genre_facet |
Methane hydrate permafrost |
op_source |
Offshore Technology Conference 2008 (OTC08); Houston, TX; 20080505 through 20080508 |
op_relation |
rep-no: BNL--82182-2009-CP grantno: DE-AC02-98CH10886 osti: 952233 http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc929376/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc929376 |
_version_ |
1766068779626790912 |