Alaska North Slope Tundra Travel Model and Validation Study

The Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Division of Mining, Land, and Water manages cross-country travel, typically associated with hydrocarbon exploration and development, on Alaska's arctic North Slope. This project is intended to provide natural resource managers with objective, qu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bader, Harry R., Guimond, Jacynthe
Other Authors: United States. Department of Energy.
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Alaska 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2172/881572
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc885699/
id ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc885699
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivnotexas
language English
topic Decision Making
Hydrocarbons
Absorption
Snow
Radiations
Alaska
Plants
Tundra
Soils
Environmental Protection
54 Environmental Sciences
Moisture
Validation
Communities
spellingShingle Decision Making
Hydrocarbons
Absorption
Snow
Radiations
Alaska
Plants
Tundra
Soils
Environmental Protection
54 Environmental Sciences
Moisture
Validation
Communities
Bader, Harry R.
Guimond, Jacynthe
Alaska North Slope Tundra Travel Model and Validation Study
topic_facet Decision Making
Hydrocarbons
Absorption
Snow
Radiations
Alaska
Plants
Tundra
Soils
Environmental Protection
54 Environmental Sciences
Moisture
Validation
Communities
description The Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Division of Mining, Land, and Water manages cross-country travel, typically associated with hydrocarbon exploration and development, on Alaska's arctic North Slope. This project is intended to provide natural resource managers with objective, quantitative data to assist decision making regarding opening of the tundra to cross-country travel. DNR designed standardized, controlled field trials, with baseline data, to investigate the relationships present between winter exploration vehicle treatments and the independent variables of ground hardness, snow depth, and snow slab thickness, as they relate to the dependent variables of active layer depth, soil moisture, and photosynthetically active radiation (a proxy for plant disturbance). Changes in the dependent variables were used as indicators of tundra disturbance. Two main tundra community types were studied: Coastal Plain (wet graminoid/moist sedge shrub) and Foothills (tussock). DNR constructed four models to address physical soil properties: two models for each main community type, one predicting change in depth of active layer and a second predicting change in soil moisture. DNR also investigated the limited potential management utility in using soil temperature, the amount of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) absorbed by plants, and changes in microphotography as tools for the identification of disturbance in the field. DNR operated under the assumption that changes in the abiotic factors of active layer depth and soil moisture drive alteration in tundra vegetation structure and composition. Statistically significant differences in depth of active layer, soil moisture at a 15 cm depth, soil temperature at a 15 cm depth, and the absorption of photosynthetically active radiation were found among treatment cells and among treatment types. The models were unable to thoroughly investigate the interacting role between snow depth and disturbance due to a lack of variability in snow depth cover throughout the period of field experimentation. The amount of change in disturbance indicators was greater in the tundra communities of the Foothills than in those of the Coastal Plain. However the overall level of change in both community types was less than expected. In Coastal Plain communities, ground hardness and snow slab thickness were found to play an important role in change in active layer depth and soil moisture as a result of treatment. In the Foothills communities, snow cover had the most influence on active layer depth and soil moisture as a result of treatment. Once certain minimum thresholds for ground hardness, snow slab thickness, and snow depth were attained, it appeared that little or no additive effect was realized regarding increased resistance to disturbance in the tundra communities studied. DNR used the results of this modeling project to set a standard for maximum permissible disturbance of cross-country tundra travel, with the threshold set below the widely accepted standard of Low Disturbance levels (as determined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). DNR followed the modeling project with a validation study, which seemed to support the field trial conclusions and indicated that the standard set for maximum permissible disturbance exhibits a conservative bias in favor of environmental protection. Finally DNR established a quick and efficient tool for visual estimations of disturbance to determine when investment in field measurements is warranted. This Visual Assessment System (VAS) seemed to support the plot disturbance measurements taking during the modeling and validation phases of this project.
author2 United States. Department of Energy.
format Report
author Bader, Harry R.
Guimond, Jacynthe
author_facet Bader, Harry R.
Guimond, Jacynthe
author_sort Bader, Harry R.
title Alaska North Slope Tundra Travel Model and Validation Study
title_short Alaska North Slope Tundra Travel Model and Validation Study
title_full Alaska North Slope Tundra Travel Model and Validation Study
title_fullStr Alaska North Slope Tundra Travel Model and Validation Study
title_full_unstemmed Alaska North Slope Tundra Travel Model and Validation Study
title_sort alaska north slope tundra travel model and validation study
publisher Alaska
publishDate 2006
url https://doi.org/10.2172/881572
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc885699/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Alaska North Slope
Arctic
north slope
Tundra
Alaska
genre_facet Alaska North Slope
Arctic
north slope
Tundra
Alaska
op_relation grantno: FG26-03NT41790
doi:10.2172/881572
osti: 881572
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc885699/
ark: ark:/67531/metadc885699
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2172/881572
_version_ 1766167897820889088
spelling ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc885699 2023-05-15T13:09:14+02:00 Alaska North Slope Tundra Travel Model and Validation Study Bader, Harry R. Guimond, Jacynthe United States. Department of Energy. 2006-03-01 Text https://doi.org/10.2172/881572 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc885699/ English eng Alaska grantno: FG26-03NT41790 doi:10.2172/881572 osti: 881572 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc885699/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc885699 Decision Making Hydrocarbons Absorption Snow Radiations Alaska Plants Tundra Soils Environmental Protection 54 Environmental Sciences Moisture Validation Communities Report 2006 ftunivnotexas https://doi.org/10.2172/881572 2019-06-29T22:08:22Z The Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Division of Mining, Land, and Water manages cross-country travel, typically associated with hydrocarbon exploration and development, on Alaska's arctic North Slope. This project is intended to provide natural resource managers with objective, quantitative data to assist decision making regarding opening of the tundra to cross-country travel. DNR designed standardized, controlled field trials, with baseline data, to investigate the relationships present between winter exploration vehicle treatments and the independent variables of ground hardness, snow depth, and snow slab thickness, as they relate to the dependent variables of active layer depth, soil moisture, and photosynthetically active radiation (a proxy for plant disturbance). Changes in the dependent variables were used as indicators of tundra disturbance. Two main tundra community types were studied: Coastal Plain (wet graminoid/moist sedge shrub) and Foothills (tussock). DNR constructed four models to address physical soil properties: two models for each main community type, one predicting change in depth of active layer and a second predicting change in soil moisture. DNR also investigated the limited potential management utility in using soil temperature, the amount of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) absorbed by plants, and changes in microphotography as tools for the identification of disturbance in the field. DNR operated under the assumption that changes in the abiotic factors of active layer depth and soil moisture drive alteration in tundra vegetation structure and composition. Statistically significant differences in depth of active layer, soil moisture at a 15 cm depth, soil temperature at a 15 cm depth, and the absorption of photosynthetically active radiation were found among treatment cells and among treatment types. The models were unable to thoroughly investigate the interacting role between snow depth and disturbance due to a lack of variability in snow depth cover throughout the period of field experimentation. The amount of change in disturbance indicators was greater in the tundra communities of the Foothills than in those of the Coastal Plain. However the overall level of change in both community types was less than expected. In Coastal Plain communities, ground hardness and snow slab thickness were found to play an important role in change in active layer depth and soil moisture as a result of treatment. In the Foothills communities, snow cover had the most influence on active layer depth and soil moisture as a result of treatment. Once certain minimum thresholds for ground hardness, snow slab thickness, and snow depth were attained, it appeared that little or no additive effect was realized regarding increased resistance to disturbance in the tundra communities studied. DNR used the results of this modeling project to set a standard for maximum permissible disturbance of cross-country tundra travel, with the threshold set below the widely accepted standard of Low Disturbance levels (as determined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). DNR followed the modeling project with a validation study, which seemed to support the field trial conclusions and indicated that the standard set for maximum permissible disturbance exhibits a conservative bias in favor of environmental protection. Finally DNR established a quick and efficient tool for visual estimations of disturbance to determine when investment in field measurements is warranted. This Visual Assessment System (VAS) seemed to support the plot disturbance measurements taking during the modeling and validation phases of this project. Report Alaska North Slope Arctic north slope Tundra Alaska University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library Arctic