Geophysical Techniques for Monitoring CO2 Movement During Sequestration

The relative merits of the seismic, gravity, and electromagnetic (EM) geophysical techniques are examined as monitoring tools for geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}). This work does not represent an exhaustive study, but rather demonstrates the capabilities of a number of geophysica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gasperikova, Erika, Hoversten, G. Michael
Other Authors: United States. Department of Energy.
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: California Energy Commission 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2172/903471
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc881995/
id ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc881995
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc881995 2023-05-15T17:40:14+02:00 Geophysical Techniques for Monitoring CO2 Movement During Sequestration Gasperikova, Erika Hoversten, G. Michael United States. Department of Energy. 2005-11-15 Text https://doi.org/10.2172/903471 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc881995/ English eng California Energy Commission grantno: FC26-03NT41984 doi:10.2172/903471 osti: 903471 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc881995/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc881995 Natural Gas Fields Hydrocarbons 02 Petroleum Oil Fields Monitoring Carbon Dioxide Geophysics 03 Natural Gas Performance Report 2005 ftunivnotexas https://doi.org/10.2172/903471 2019-05-25T22:08:03Z The relative merits of the seismic, gravity, and electromagnetic (EM) geophysical techniques are examined as monitoring tools for geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}). This work does not represent an exhaustive study, but rather demonstrates the capabilities of a number of geophysical techniques for two synthetic modeling scenarios. The first scenario represents combined CO{sub 2} enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and sequestration in a producing oil field, the Schrader Bluff field on the north slope of Alaska, USA. EOR/sequestration projects in general and Schrader Bluff in particular represent relatively thin injection intervals with multiple fluid components (oil, hydrocarbon gas, brine, and CO{sub 2}). This model represents the most difficult end member of a complex spectrum of possible sequestration scenarios. The time-lapse performance of seismic, gravity, and EM techniques are considered for the Schrader Bluff model. The second scenario is a gas field that in general resembles conditions of Rio Vista reservoir in the Sacramento Basin of California. Surface gravity, and seismic measurements are considered for this model. Report north slope Alaska University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library
institution Open Polar
collection University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivnotexas
language English
topic Natural Gas Fields
Hydrocarbons
02 Petroleum
Oil Fields
Monitoring
Carbon Dioxide
Geophysics
03 Natural Gas
Performance
spellingShingle Natural Gas Fields
Hydrocarbons
02 Petroleum
Oil Fields
Monitoring
Carbon Dioxide
Geophysics
03 Natural Gas
Performance
Gasperikova, Erika
Hoversten, G. Michael
Geophysical Techniques for Monitoring CO2 Movement During Sequestration
topic_facet Natural Gas Fields
Hydrocarbons
02 Petroleum
Oil Fields
Monitoring
Carbon Dioxide
Geophysics
03 Natural Gas
Performance
description The relative merits of the seismic, gravity, and electromagnetic (EM) geophysical techniques are examined as monitoring tools for geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}). This work does not represent an exhaustive study, but rather demonstrates the capabilities of a number of geophysical techniques for two synthetic modeling scenarios. The first scenario represents combined CO{sub 2} enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and sequestration in a producing oil field, the Schrader Bluff field on the north slope of Alaska, USA. EOR/sequestration projects in general and Schrader Bluff in particular represent relatively thin injection intervals with multiple fluid components (oil, hydrocarbon gas, brine, and CO{sub 2}). This model represents the most difficult end member of a complex spectrum of possible sequestration scenarios. The time-lapse performance of seismic, gravity, and EM techniques are considered for the Schrader Bluff model. The second scenario is a gas field that in general resembles conditions of Rio Vista reservoir in the Sacramento Basin of California. Surface gravity, and seismic measurements are considered for this model.
author2 United States. Department of Energy.
format Report
author Gasperikova, Erika
Hoversten, G. Michael
author_facet Gasperikova, Erika
Hoversten, G. Michael
author_sort Gasperikova, Erika
title Geophysical Techniques for Monitoring CO2 Movement During Sequestration
title_short Geophysical Techniques for Monitoring CO2 Movement During Sequestration
title_full Geophysical Techniques for Monitoring CO2 Movement During Sequestration
title_fullStr Geophysical Techniques for Monitoring CO2 Movement During Sequestration
title_full_unstemmed Geophysical Techniques for Monitoring CO2 Movement During Sequestration
title_sort geophysical techniques for monitoring co2 movement during sequestration
publisher California Energy Commission
publishDate 2005
url https://doi.org/10.2172/903471
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc881995/
genre north slope
Alaska
genre_facet north slope
Alaska
op_relation grantno: FC26-03NT41984
doi:10.2172/903471
osti: 903471
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc881995/
ark: ark:/67531/metadc881995
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2172/903471
_version_ 1766141113012322304