Methane Hydrate Production From Alaskan Permafrost Progress Report

Natural-gas hydrates have been encountered beneath the permafrost and considered a nuisance by the oil and gas industry for years. Engineers working in Russia, Canada and the USA have documented numerous drilling problems, including kicks and uncontrolled gas releases, in arctic regions. Information...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sigal, Richard, Newsham, Kent, Williams, Thomas, Freifeld, Barry, Kneafsey, Timothy, Sondergeld, Carl, Rai, Shandra, Kwan, Jonathan, Kirby, Stephen, Kleinberg, Robert, Griffin, Doug
Other Authors: United States
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Maurer Technology Inc. (United States) 2005
Subjects:
Psi
Ice
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2172/839329
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc786910/
id ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc786910
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivnotexas
language English
topic Natural Gas
Grain Density
Geology
Permafrost
Environmental Impacts
Hydrates
Drilling
Thawing
Porosity
Stability
Gas Hydrates
Geophysics
Sandstones
Chemistry
03 Natural Gas
Permeability
Arctic Regions
Reservoir Rock
spellingShingle Natural Gas
Grain Density
Geology
Permafrost
Environmental Impacts
Hydrates
Drilling
Thawing
Porosity
Stability
Gas Hydrates
Geophysics
Sandstones
Chemistry
03 Natural Gas
Permeability
Arctic Regions
Reservoir Rock
Sigal, Richard
Newsham, Kent
Williams, Thomas
Freifeld, Barry
Kneafsey, Timothy
Sondergeld, Carl
Rai, Shandra
Kwan, Jonathan
Kirby, Stephen
Kleinberg, Robert
Griffin, Doug
Methane Hydrate Production From Alaskan Permafrost Progress Report
topic_facet Natural Gas
Grain Density
Geology
Permafrost
Environmental Impacts
Hydrates
Drilling
Thawing
Porosity
Stability
Gas Hydrates
Geophysics
Sandstones
Chemistry
03 Natural Gas
Permeability
Arctic Regions
Reservoir Rock
description Natural-gas hydrates have been encountered beneath the permafrost and considered a nuisance by the oil and gas industry for years. Engineers working in Russia, Canada and the USA have documented numerous drilling problems, including kicks and uncontrolled gas releases, in arctic regions. Information has been generated in laboratory studies pertaining to the extent, volume, chemistry and phase behavior of gas hydrates. Scientists studying hydrate potential agree that the potential is great--on the North Slope of Alaska alone, it has been estimated at 590 TCF. However, little information has been obtained on physical samples taken from actual rock containing hydrates. The work scope drilled and cored a well The Hot Ice No. 1 on Anadarko leases beginning in FY 2003 and completed in 2004. An on-site core analysis laboratory was built and utilized for determining the physical characteristics of the hydrates and surrounding rock. The well was drilled from a new Anadarko Arctic Platform that has a minimal footprint and environmental impact. The final efforts of the project are to correlate geology, geophysics, logs, and drilling and production data and provide this information to scientists developing reservoir models. No gas hydrates were encountered in this well; however, a wealth of information was generated and is contained in this report. The Hot Ice No. 1 well was drilled from the surface to a measured depth of 2300 ft. There was almost 100% core recovery from the bottom of surface casing at 107 ft to total depth. Based on the best estimate of the bottom of the methane hydrate stability zone (which used new data obtained from Hot Ice No. 1 and new analysis of data from adjacent wells), core was recovered over its complete range. Approximately 580 ft of porous, mostly frozen, sandstone and 155 of conglomerate were recovered in the Ugnu Formation and approximately 215 ft of porous sandstone were recovered in the West Sak Formation. There were gas shows in the bottom part of the Ugnu and throughout the West Sak. No hydrate-bearing zones were identified either in recovered core or on well logs. The base of the permafrost was found at about 1260 ft. With the exception of the deepest sands in the West Sak and some anomalous thin, tight zones, all sands recovered (after thawing) are unconsolidated with high porosity and high permeability. At 800 psi, Ugnu sands have an average porosity of 39.3% and geometrical mean permeability of 3.7 Darcys. Average grain density is 2.64 g/cc. West Sak sands have an average porosity of 35.5%, geometrical mean permeability of 0.3 Darcys, and average grain density of 2.70 g/cc. There were several 1-2 ft intervals of carbonate-cemented sandstone recovered from the West Sak. These intervals have porosities of only a few percent and very low permeability. On a well log they appear as resistive with a high sonic velocity. In shallow sections of other wells these usually are the only logs available. Given the presence of gas in Hot Ice No. 1, if only resistivity and sonic logs and a mud log had been available, tight sand zones may have been interpreted as containing hydrates. Although this finding does not imply that all previously mapped hydrate zones are merely tight sands, it does add a note of caution to the practice of interpreting the presence of hydrates from old well information. The methane hydrate stability zone below the Hot Ice No. 1 location includes thick sections of sandstone and conglomerate which would make excellent reservoir rocks for hydrates and below the permafrost zone shallow gas. The Ugnu formation comprises a more sand-rich section than does the West Sak formation, and the Ugnu sands when cleaned and dried are slightly more porous and significantly more permeable than the West Sak.
author2 United States
format Report
author Sigal, Richard
Newsham, Kent
Williams, Thomas
Freifeld, Barry
Kneafsey, Timothy
Sondergeld, Carl
Rai, Shandra
Kwan, Jonathan
Kirby, Stephen
Kleinberg, Robert
Griffin, Doug
author_facet Sigal, Richard
Newsham, Kent
Williams, Thomas
Freifeld, Barry
Kneafsey, Timothy
Sondergeld, Carl
Rai, Shandra
Kwan, Jonathan
Kirby, Stephen
Kleinberg, Robert
Griffin, Doug
author_sort Sigal, Richard
title Methane Hydrate Production From Alaskan Permafrost Progress Report
title_short Methane Hydrate Production From Alaskan Permafrost Progress Report
title_full Methane Hydrate Production From Alaskan Permafrost Progress Report
title_fullStr Methane Hydrate Production From Alaskan Permafrost Progress Report
title_full_unstemmed Methane Hydrate Production From Alaskan Permafrost Progress Report
title_sort methane hydrate production from alaskan permafrost progress report
publisher Maurer Technology Inc. (United States)
publishDate 2005
url https://doi.org/10.2172/839329
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc786910/
long_lat ENVELOPE(-63.000,-63.000,-64.300,-64.300)
geographic Arctic
Canada
Psi
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
Psi
genre Arctic
Ice
Methane hydrate
north slope
permafrost
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Ice
Methane hydrate
north slope
permafrost
Alaska
op_source Other Information: PBD: 1 Feb 2005
op_relation grantno: FC26-01NT41331
doi:10.2172/839329
osti: 839329
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc786910/
ark: ark:/67531/metadc786910
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2172/839329
_version_ 1766338397258907648
spelling ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc786910 2023-05-15T15:06:50+02:00 Methane Hydrate Production From Alaskan Permafrost Progress Report Sigal, Richard Newsham, Kent Williams, Thomas Freifeld, Barry Kneafsey, Timothy Sondergeld, Carl Rai, Shandra Kwan, Jonathan Kirby, Stephen Kleinberg, Robert Griffin, Doug United States 2005-02-01 225 pages Text https://doi.org/10.2172/839329 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc786910/ English eng Maurer Technology Inc. (United States) grantno: FC26-01NT41331 doi:10.2172/839329 osti: 839329 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc786910/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc786910 Other Information: PBD: 1 Feb 2005 Natural Gas Grain Density Geology Permafrost Environmental Impacts Hydrates Drilling Thawing Porosity Stability Gas Hydrates Geophysics Sandstones Chemistry 03 Natural Gas Permeability Arctic Regions Reservoir Rock Report 2005 ftunivnotexas https://doi.org/10.2172/839329 2019-07-06T22:08:18Z Natural-gas hydrates have been encountered beneath the permafrost and considered a nuisance by the oil and gas industry for years. Engineers working in Russia, Canada and the USA have documented numerous drilling problems, including kicks and uncontrolled gas releases, in arctic regions. Information has been generated in laboratory studies pertaining to the extent, volume, chemistry and phase behavior of gas hydrates. Scientists studying hydrate potential agree that the potential is great--on the North Slope of Alaska alone, it has been estimated at 590 TCF. However, little information has been obtained on physical samples taken from actual rock containing hydrates. The work scope drilled and cored a well The Hot Ice No. 1 on Anadarko leases beginning in FY 2003 and completed in 2004. An on-site core analysis laboratory was built and utilized for determining the physical characteristics of the hydrates and surrounding rock. The well was drilled from a new Anadarko Arctic Platform that has a minimal footprint and environmental impact. The final efforts of the project are to correlate geology, geophysics, logs, and drilling and production data and provide this information to scientists developing reservoir models. No gas hydrates were encountered in this well; however, a wealth of information was generated and is contained in this report. The Hot Ice No. 1 well was drilled from the surface to a measured depth of 2300 ft. There was almost 100% core recovery from the bottom of surface casing at 107 ft to total depth. Based on the best estimate of the bottom of the methane hydrate stability zone (which used new data obtained from Hot Ice No. 1 and new analysis of data from adjacent wells), core was recovered over its complete range. Approximately 580 ft of porous, mostly frozen, sandstone and 155 of conglomerate were recovered in the Ugnu Formation and approximately 215 ft of porous sandstone were recovered in the West Sak Formation. There were gas shows in the bottom part of the Ugnu and throughout the West Sak. No hydrate-bearing zones were identified either in recovered core or on well logs. The base of the permafrost was found at about 1260 ft. With the exception of the deepest sands in the West Sak and some anomalous thin, tight zones, all sands recovered (after thawing) are unconsolidated with high porosity and high permeability. At 800 psi, Ugnu sands have an average porosity of 39.3% and geometrical mean permeability of 3.7 Darcys. Average grain density is 2.64 g/cc. West Sak sands have an average porosity of 35.5%, geometrical mean permeability of 0.3 Darcys, and average grain density of 2.70 g/cc. There were several 1-2 ft intervals of carbonate-cemented sandstone recovered from the West Sak. These intervals have porosities of only a few percent and very low permeability. On a well log they appear as resistive with a high sonic velocity. In shallow sections of other wells these usually are the only logs available. Given the presence of gas in Hot Ice No. 1, if only resistivity and sonic logs and a mud log had been available, tight sand zones may have been interpreted as containing hydrates. Although this finding does not imply that all previously mapped hydrate zones are merely tight sands, it does add a note of caution to the practice of interpreting the presence of hydrates from old well information. The methane hydrate stability zone below the Hot Ice No. 1 location includes thick sections of sandstone and conglomerate which would make excellent reservoir rocks for hydrates and below the permafrost zone shallow gas. The Ugnu formation comprises a more sand-rich section than does the West Sak formation, and the Ugnu sands when cleaned and dried are slightly more porous and significantly more permeable than the West Sak. Report Arctic Ice Methane hydrate north slope permafrost Alaska University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library Arctic Canada Psi ENVELOPE(-63.000,-63.000,-64.300,-64.300)