Two Views of Public Participation

Risk perception has been studied extensively over the past several decades. This research has defined the differences that exist between and among various groups as defined by their education, interests, geographic distribution, and beliefs. It has also been repeatedly demonstrated that various publ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blackman, H. S., Harbour, J. L.
Other Authors: United States. Department of Energy.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: WM Symposia, Inc. 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc779213/
_version_ 1821651746115551232
author Blackman, H. S.
Harbour, J. L.
author2 United States. Department of Energy.
author_facet Blackman, H. S.
Harbour, J. L.
author_sort Blackman, H. S.
collection University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library
description Risk perception has been studied extensively over the past several decades. This research has defined the differences that exist between and among various groups as defined by their education, interests, geographic distribution, and beliefs. It has also been repeatedly demonstrated that various public groups can and do have a tremendous impact on decisions made in the public and private sectors. Involved citizens for example, have caused international corporations as well as the Department of Energy to change or even reverse a chosen course of action. A frequent cause of such reversals is attributed to a lack of involvement of the public and other key decision players directly in the decision process itself. Through our research and case studies, we have developed both an ''as is'' and a ''participatory'' model of decision-making process. The latter decision model allows the direct involvement of important player groups. The paper presents and discusses these models in theoretical and practical terms taken from case studies of the Brent Spar disposal in the North Atlantic, and the use of incineration as a method of waste treatment at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Results from the case studies are used to demonstrate why the ''as is'' model accurately describes the current situation, and how the ''participatory model'' will allow decisions to be made that are publicly supported and can be implemented. The use of such a model will provide users a framework from which to successfully make progress in a wide range of environmental endeavors cooperatively with the public, rather than in spite of the public.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
id ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc779213
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivnotexas
op_relation osti: 827677
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc779213/
ark: ark:/67531/metadc779213
op_source Waste Management 2002 Symposium, Tucson, AZ (US), 02/24/2002--02/28/2002
publishDate 2002
publisher WM Symposia, Inc.
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc779213 2025-01-16T23:43:04+00:00 Two Views of Public Participation Blackman, H. S. Harbour, J. L. United States. Department of Energy. 2002-02-28 8 pages Text https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc779213/ English eng WM Symposia, Inc. Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory osti: 827677 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc779213/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc779213 Waste Management 2002 Symposium, Tucson, AZ (US), 02/24/2002--02/28/2002 Decision Making Combustion Waste Processing Waste Management 29 Energy Planning Policy And Economy Idaho National Engineering Laboratory 12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities Education Distribution Article 2002 ftunivnotexas 2019-06-29T22:08:22Z Risk perception has been studied extensively over the past several decades. This research has defined the differences that exist between and among various groups as defined by their education, interests, geographic distribution, and beliefs. It has also been repeatedly demonstrated that various public groups can and do have a tremendous impact on decisions made in the public and private sectors. Involved citizens for example, have caused international corporations as well as the Department of Energy to change or even reverse a chosen course of action. A frequent cause of such reversals is attributed to a lack of involvement of the public and other key decision players directly in the decision process itself. Through our research and case studies, we have developed both an ''as is'' and a ''participatory'' model of decision-making process. The latter decision model allows the direct involvement of important player groups. The paper presents and discusses these models in theoretical and practical terms taken from case studies of the Brent Spar disposal in the North Atlantic, and the use of incineration as a method of waste treatment at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Results from the case studies are used to demonstrate why the ''as is'' model accurately describes the current situation, and how the ''participatory model'' will allow decisions to be made that are publicly supported and can be implemented. The use of such a model will provide users a framework from which to successfully make progress in a wide range of environmental endeavors cooperatively with the public, rather than in spite of the public. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library
spellingShingle Decision Making
Combustion
Waste Processing
Waste Management
29 Energy Planning
Policy And Economy
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes
And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities
Education
Distribution
Blackman, H. S.
Harbour, J. L.
Two Views of Public Participation
title Two Views of Public Participation
title_full Two Views of Public Participation
title_fullStr Two Views of Public Participation
title_full_unstemmed Two Views of Public Participation
title_short Two Views of Public Participation
title_sort two views of public participation
topic Decision Making
Combustion
Waste Processing
Waste Management
29 Energy Planning
Policy And Economy
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes
And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities
Education
Distribution
topic_facet Decision Making
Combustion
Waste Processing
Waste Management
29 Energy Planning
Policy And Economy
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes
And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities
Education
Distribution
url https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc779213/