Two Views of Public Participation
Risk perception has been studied extensively over the past several decades. This research has defined the differences that exist between and among various groups as defined by their education, interests, geographic distribution, and beliefs. It has also been repeatedly demonstrated that various publ...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
WM Symposia, Inc.
2002
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc779213/ |
_version_ | 1821651746115551232 |
---|---|
author | Blackman, H. S. Harbour, J. L. |
author2 | United States. Department of Energy. |
author_facet | Blackman, H. S. Harbour, J. L. |
author_sort | Blackman, H. S. |
collection | University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library |
description | Risk perception has been studied extensively over the past several decades. This research has defined the differences that exist between and among various groups as defined by their education, interests, geographic distribution, and beliefs. It has also been repeatedly demonstrated that various public groups can and do have a tremendous impact on decisions made in the public and private sectors. Involved citizens for example, have caused international corporations as well as the Department of Energy to change or even reverse a chosen course of action. A frequent cause of such reversals is attributed to a lack of involvement of the public and other key decision players directly in the decision process itself. Through our research and case studies, we have developed both an ''as is'' and a ''participatory'' model of decision-making process. The latter decision model allows the direct involvement of important player groups. The paper presents and discusses these models in theoretical and practical terms taken from case studies of the Brent Spar disposal in the North Atlantic, and the use of incineration as a method of waste treatment at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Results from the case studies are used to demonstrate why the ''as is'' model accurately describes the current situation, and how the ''participatory model'' will allow decisions to be made that are publicly supported and can be implemented. The use of such a model will provide users a framework from which to successfully make progress in a wide range of environmental endeavors cooperatively with the public, rather than in spite of the public. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | North Atlantic |
genre_facet | North Atlantic |
id | ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc779213 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftunivnotexas |
op_relation | osti: 827677 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc779213/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc779213 |
op_source | Waste Management 2002 Symposium, Tucson, AZ (US), 02/24/2002--02/28/2002 |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | WM Symposia, Inc. |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc779213 2025-01-16T23:43:04+00:00 Two Views of Public Participation Blackman, H. S. Harbour, J. L. United States. Department of Energy. 2002-02-28 8 pages Text https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc779213/ English eng WM Symposia, Inc. Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory osti: 827677 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc779213/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc779213 Waste Management 2002 Symposium, Tucson, AZ (US), 02/24/2002--02/28/2002 Decision Making Combustion Waste Processing Waste Management 29 Energy Planning Policy And Economy Idaho National Engineering Laboratory 12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities Education Distribution Article 2002 ftunivnotexas 2019-06-29T22:08:22Z Risk perception has been studied extensively over the past several decades. This research has defined the differences that exist between and among various groups as defined by their education, interests, geographic distribution, and beliefs. It has also been repeatedly demonstrated that various public groups can and do have a tremendous impact on decisions made in the public and private sectors. Involved citizens for example, have caused international corporations as well as the Department of Energy to change or even reverse a chosen course of action. A frequent cause of such reversals is attributed to a lack of involvement of the public and other key decision players directly in the decision process itself. Through our research and case studies, we have developed both an ''as is'' and a ''participatory'' model of decision-making process. The latter decision model allows the direct involvement of important player groups. The paper presents and discusses these models in theoretical and practical terms taken from case studies of the Brent Spar disposal in the North Atlantic, and the use of incineration as a method of waste treatment at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Results from the case studies are used to demonstrate why the ''as is'' model accurately describes the current situation, and how the ''participatory model'' will allow decisions to be made that are publicly supported and can be implemented. The use of such a model will provide users a framework from which to successfully make progress in a wide range of environmental endeavors cooperatively with the public, rather than in spite of the public. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library |
spellingShingle | Decision Making Combustion Waste Processing Waste Management 29 Energy Planning Policy And Economy Idaho National Engineering Laboratory 12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities Education Distribution Blackman, H. S. Harbour, J. L. Two Views of Public Participation |
title | Two Views of Public Participation |
title_full | Two Views of Public Participation |
title_fullStr | Two Views of Public Participation |
title_full_unstemmed | Two Views of Public Participation |
title_short | Two Views of Public Participation |
title_sort | two views of public participation |
topic | Decision Making Combustion Waste Processing Waste Management 29 Energy Planning Policy And Economy Idaho National Engineering Laboratory 12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities Education Distribution |
topic_facet | Decision Making Combustion Waste Processing Waste Management 29 Energy Planning Policy And Economy Idaho National Engineering Laboratory 12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities Education Distribution |
url | https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc779213/ |