Report on the HPSS Database Benchmark

Concerns about the long-term viability of SFS as the metadata store for HPSS have been increasing. A concern that Transarc may discontinue support for SFS motivates us to consider alternative means to store HPSS metadata. The obvious alternative is a commercial database. Commercial databases have th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fisher,D
Other Authors: United States. Department of Energy.
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2001
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2172/15006190
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1405330/
id ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc1405330
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnotexas:info:ark/67531/metadc1405330 2023-05-15T16:02:04+02:00 Report on the HPSS Database Benchmark Fisher,D United States. Department of Energy. 2001-06-19 PDF-FILE: 11 SIZE: 0.6 MBYTES pages Text https://doi.org/10.2172/15006190 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1405330/ English eng Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory rep-no: UCRL-ID-144274 grantno: W-7405-ENG-48 doi:10.2172/15006190 osti: 15006190 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1405330/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc1405330 Other Information: PBD: 19 Jun 2001 Management Storage 99 General And Miscellaneous//Mathematics Computing And Information Science Competition Programming Viability Maintenance Benchmarks Performance Market Report 2001 ftunivnotexas https://doi.org/10.2172/15006190 2019-02-09T23:08:25Z Concerns about the long-term viability of SFS as the metadata store for HPSS have been increasing. A concern that Transarc may discontinue support for SFS motivates us to consider alternative means to store HPSS metadata. The obvious alternative is a commercial database. Commercial databases have the necessary characteristics for storage of HPSS metadata records. They are robust and scalable and can easily accommodate the volume of data that must be stored. They provide programming interfaces, transactional semantics and a full set of maintenance and performance enhancement tools. A team was organized within the HPSS project to study and recommend an approach for the replacement of SFS. Members of the team are David Fisher, Jim Minton, Donna Mecozzi, Danny Cook, Bart Parliman and Lynn Jones. We examined several possible solutions to the problem of replacing SFS, and recommended on May 22, 2000, in a report to the HPSS Technical and Executive Committees, to change HPSS into a database application over either Oracle or DB2. We recommended either Oracle or DB2 on the basis of market share and technical suitability. Oracle and DB2 are dominant offerings in the market, and it is in the best interest of HPSS to use a major player's product. Both databases provide a suitable programming interface. Transaction management functions, support for multi-threaded clients and data manipulation languages (DML) are available. These findings were supported in meetings held with technical experts from both companies. In both cases, the evidence indicated that either database would provide the features needed to host HPSS. Report DML University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library
institution Open Polar
collection University of North Texas: UNT Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivnotexas
language English
topic Management
Storage
99 General And Miscellaneous//Mathematics
Computing
And Information Science
Competition
Programming
Viability
Maintenance
Benchmarks
Performance
Market
spellingShingle Management
Storage
99 General And Miscellaneous//Mathematics
Computing
And Information Science
Competition
Programming
Viability
Maintenance
Benchmarks
Performance
Market
Fisher,D
Report on the HPSS Database Benchmark
topic_facet Management
Storage
99 General And Miscellaneous//Mathematics
Computing
And Information Science
Competition
Programming
Viability
Maintenance
Benchmarks
Performance
Market
description Concerns about the long-term viability of SFS as the metadata store for HPSS have been increasing. A concern that Transarc may discontinue support for SFS motivates us to consider alternative means to store HPSS metadata. The obvious alternative is a commercial database. Commercial databases have the necessary characteristics for storage of HPSS metadata records. They are robust and scalable and can easily accommodate the volume of data that must be stored. They provide programming interfaces, transactional semantics and a full set of maintenance and performance enhancement tools. A team was organized within the HPSS project to study and recommend an approach for the replacement of SFS. Members of the team are David Fisher, Jim Minton, Donna Mecozzi, Danny Cook, Bart Parliman and Lynn Jones. We examined several possible solutions to the problem of replacing SFS, and recommended on May 22, 2000, in a report to the HPSS Technical and Executive Committees, to change HPSS into a database application over either Oracle or DB2. We recommended either Oracle or DB2 on the basis of market share and technical suitability. Oracle and DB2 are dominant offerings in the market, and it is in the best interest of HPSS to use a major player's product. Both databases provide a suitable programming interface. Transaction management functions, support for multi-threaded clients and data manipulation languages (DML) are available. These findings were supported in meetings held with technical experts from both companies. In both cases, the evidence indicated that either database would provide the features needed to host HPSS.
author2 United States. Department of Energy.
format Report
author Fisher,D
author_facet Fisher,D
author_sort Fisher,D
title Report on the HPSS Database Benchmark
title_short Report on the HPSS Database Benchmark
title_full Report on the HPSS Database Benchmark
title_fullStr Report on the HPSS Database Benchmark
title_full_unstemmed Report on the HPSS Database Benchmark
title_sort report on the hpss database benchmark
publisher Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
publishDate 2001
url https://doi.org/10.2172/15006190
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1405330/
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_source Other Information: PBD: 19 Jun 2001
op_relation rep-no: UCRL-ID-144274
grantno: W-7405-ENG-48
doi:10.2172/15006190
osti: 15006190
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1405330/
ark: ark:/67531/metadc1405330
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2172/15006190
_version_ 1766397695078957056