Regional versus remote atmosphere‐ocean drivers of the rapid projected intensification of the East Australian Current

• Published in: Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
• Main Authors: Bull, Christopher, Kiss, Andrew E., Sen Gupta, Alex, Jourdain, Nicolas C., Argüeso, Daniel, Di Luca, Alejandro, Sérazin, Guillaume
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: American Geophysical Union 2020
• Subjects: F700 Ocean Sciences; F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences; Curl; Southern Ocean
• Online Access: https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/43570/; https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jc015889; https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/43570/7/2019JC015889.pdf; https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/43570/1/2019JC015889.pdf

Like many western boundary currents, the East Australian Current extension is projected to get stronger and warmer in the future. The CMIP5 multi‐model mean (MMM) projection suggests up to 5°C of warming under an RCP85 scenario by 2100. Previous studies employed Sverdrup balance to associate a trend in basin wide zonally integrated wind stress curl (resulting from the multi‐decadal poleward intensification in the westerly winds over the Southern Ocean) with enhanced transport in the EAC extension. Possible regional drivers are yet to be considered. Here, we introduce the NEMO‐OASIS‐WRF coupled regional climate model as a framework to improve our understanding of CMIP5 projections. We analyse a hierarchy of simulations in which the regional atmosphere and ocean circulations are allowed to freely evolve subject to boundary conditions that represent present day and CMIP5 RCP8.5 climate change anomalies. Evaluation of the historical simulation shows an EAC extension that is stronger than similar ocean‐only models and observations. This bias is not explained by a linear response to differences in wind stress. The climate change simulations show that regional atmospheric CMIP5 MMM anomalies drive 73% of the projected 12 Sv increase in EAC extension transport whereas the remote ocean boundary conditions and regional radiative forcing (greenhouse gases within the domain) play a smaller role. The importance of regional changes in wind stress curl in driving the enhanced EAC extension is consistent with linear theory where the NEMO‐OASIS‐WRF response is closer to linear transport estimates compared to the CMIP5 MMM.