Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics

Recent observations indicate that many marine‐terminating glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica are currently retreating and thinning, potentially due to long‐term trends in climate forcing. In this study, we describe a simple two‐stage model that accurately emulates the response to external forcing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Main Authors: Robel, Alexander A., Roe, Gerard H., Haseloff, Marianne
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/42292/
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004709
https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/42292/1/Robel_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Earth_Surface.pdf
_version_ 1821621234114232320
author Robel, Alexander A.
Roe, Gerard H.
Haseloff, Marianne
author_facet Robel, Alexander A.
Roe, Gerard H.
Haseloff, Marianne
author_sort Robel, Alexander A.
collection Northumbria University, Newcastle: Northumbria Research Link (NRL)
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2205
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
container_volume 123
description Recent observations indicate that many marine‐terminating glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica are currently retreating and thinning, potentially due to long‐term trends in climate forcing. In this study, we describe a simple two‐stage model that accurately emulates the response to external forcing of marine‐terminating glaciers simulated in a spatially extended model. The simplicity of the model permits derivation of analytical expressions describing the marine‐terminating glacier response to forcing. We find that there are two time scales that characterize the stable glacier response to external forcing, a fast time scale of decades to centuries, and a slow time scale of millennia. These two time scales become unstable at different thresholds of bed slope, indicating that there are distinct slow and fast forms of the marine ice sheet instability. We derive simple expressions for the approximate magnitude and transient evolution of the stable glacier response to external forcing, which depend on the equilibrium glacier state and the strength of nonlinearity in forcing processes. The slow response rate of marine‐terminating glaciers indicates that current changes at some glaciers are set to continue and accelerate in coming centuries in response to past climate forcing and that the current extent of change at these glaciers is likely a small fraction of the future committed change caused by past climate forcing. Finally, we find that changing the amplitude of natural fluctuations in some nonlinear forcing processes, such as ice shelf calving, changes the equilibrium glacier state.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
glacier
Greenland
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
glacier
Greenland
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
id ftunivnorthumb:oai:nrl.northumbria.ac.uk:42292
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivnorthumb
op_container_end_page 2227
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004709
op_relation https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/42292/1/Robel_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Earth_Surface.pdf
Robel, Alexander A., Roe, Gerard H. and Haseloff, Marianne (2018) Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 123 (9). pp. 2205-2227. ISSN 2169-9003
publishDate 2018
publisher American Geophysical Union
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnorthumb:oai:nrl.northumbria.ac.uk:42292 2025-01-16T19:10:15+00:00 Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics Robel, Alexander A. Roe, Gerard H. Haseloff, Marianne 2018-09 text https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/42292/ https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004709 https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/42292/1/Robel_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Earth_Surface.pdf en eng American Geophysical Union https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/42292/1/Robel_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Earth_Surface.pdf Robel, Alexander A., Roe, Gerard H. and Haseloff, Marianne (2018) Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 123 (9). pp. 2205-2227. ISSN 2169-9003 F600 Geology F700 Ocean Sciences F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences Article PeerReviewed 2018 ftunivnorthumb https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004709 2022-09-25T06:11:31Z Recent observations indicate that many marine‐terminating glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica are currently retreating and thinning, potentially due to long‐term trends in climate forcing. In this study, we describe a simple two‐stage model that accurately emulates the response to external forcing of marine‐terminating glaciers simulated in a spatially extended model. The simplicity of the model permits derivation of analytical expressions describing the marine‐terminating glacier response to forcing. We find that there are two time scales that characterize the stable glacier response to external forcing, a fast time scale of decades to centuries, and a slow time scale of millennia. These two time scales become unstable at different thresholds of bed slope, indicating that there are distinct slow and fast forms of the marine ice sheet instability. We derive simple expressions for the approximate magnitude and transient evolution of the stable glacier response to external forcing, which depend on the equilibrium glacier state and the strength of nonlinearity in forcing processes. The slow response rate of marine‐terminating glaciers indicates that current changes at some glaciers are set to continue and accelerate in coming centuries in response to past climate forcing and that the current extent of change at these glaciers is likely a small fraction of the future committed change caused by past climate forcing. Finally, we find that changing the amplitude of natural fluctuations in some nonlinear forcing processes, such as ice shelf calving, changes the equilibrium glacier state. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica glacier Greenland Ice Sheet Ice Shelf Northumbria University, Newcastle: Northumbria Research Link (NRL) Greenland Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 123 9 2205 2227
spellingShingle F600 Geology
F700 Ocean Sciences
F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences
Robel, Alexander A.
Roe, Gerard H.
Haseloff, Marianne
Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics
title Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics
title_full Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics
title_fullStr Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics
title_short Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics
title_sort response of marine‐terminating glaciers to forcing: time scales, sensitivities, instabilities, and stochastic dynamics
topic F600 Geology
F700 Ocean Sciences
F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences
topic_facet F600 Geology
F700 Ocean Sciences
F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences
url https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/42292/
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004709
https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/42292/1/Robel_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Earth_Surface.pdf