Assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions

The continued use of the Positive Degree-Day (PDD) method to predict ice sheet melt is generally favoured over surface energy balance methods partly due to the computational efficiency of the algorithm and the requirement of only one input variable (temperature). In this paper we revisit some of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: Wake, Leanne, Marshall, Shawn
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: International Glaciological Society 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/21640/
https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J116
https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/21640/1/Wake_L_glaciated_regions.pdf
id ftunivnorthumb:oai:nrl.northumbria.ac.uk:21640
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnorthumb:oai:nrl.northumbria.ac.uk:21640 2023-05-15T16:29:25+02:00 Assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions Wake, Leanne Marshall, Shawn 2015 application/pdf https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/21640/ https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J116 https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/21640/1/Wake_L_glaciated_regions.pdf en eng International Glaciological Society https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/21640/1/Wake_L_glaciated_regions.pdf Wake, Leanne and Marshall, Shawn (2015) Assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions. Journal of Glaciology, 61 (226). pp. 329-344. ISSN 0022-1430 F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences Article PeerReviewed 2015 ftunivnorthumb https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J116 2022-09-25T06:01:23Z The continued use of the Positive Degree-Day (PDD) method to predict ice sheet melt is generally favoured over surface energy balance methods partly due to the computational efficiency of the algorithm and the requirement of only one input variable (temperature). In this paper we revisit some of the assumptions governing the application of the PDD method. Using hourly temperature data from the GC-Net network we test the assumption that monthly PDD total (PDDm) can be represented by a Gaussian distribution with fixed standard deviation of monthly temperature (σM). The results presented here show that the common assumption of fixed σM does not hold, and that σM may be represented more accurately as a quadratic function of average monthly temperature. For Greenland, the mean absolute error in predicting PDDm using our methodology is 3.9°C*day, representing a significant improvement on current methods (7.8°C*day, when σM = 4.5°C). Over a range of glaciated settings, our method reproduces PDDm, on average, to within 1.5 - 8.5°C*day, compared to 4.4 - 15.7°C*day when σM = 4.5°. The improvement arises because we capture the systematic reduction in temperature variance that is observed over melting snow and ice, when surface temperatures cannot warm above O°C. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Ice Sheet Journal of Glaciology Northumbria University, Newcastle: Northumbria Research Link (NRL) Greenland Journal of Glaciology 61 226 329 344
institution Open Polar
collection Northumbria University, Newcastle: Northumbria Research Link (NRL)
op_collection_id ftunivnorthumb
language English
topic F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences
spellingShingle F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences
Wake, Leanne
Marshall, Shawn
Assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions
topic_facet F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences
description The continued use of the Positive Degree-Day (PDD) method to predict ice sheet melt is generally favoured over surface energy balance methods partly due to the computational efficiency of the algorithm and the requirement of only one input variable (temperature). In this paper we revisit some of the assumptions governing the application of the PDD method. Using hourly temperature data from the GC-Net network we test the assumption that monthly PDD total (PDDm) can be represented by a Gaussian distribution with fixed standard deviation of monthly temperature (σM). The results presented here show that the common assumption of fixed σM does not hold, and that σM may be represented more accurately as a quadratic function of average monthly temperature. For Greenland, the mean absolute error in predicting PDDm using our methodology is 3.9°C*day, representing a significant improvement on current methods (7.8°C*day, when σM = 4.5°C). Over a range of glaciated settings, our method reproduces PDDm, on average, to within 1.5 - 8.5°C*day, compared to 4.4 - 15.7°C*day when σM = 4.5°. The improvement arises because we capture the systematic reduction in temperature variance that is observed over melting snow and ice, when surface temperatures cannot warm above O°C.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wake, Leanne
Marshall, Shawn
author_facet Wake, Leanne
Marshall, Shawn
author_sort Wake, Leanne
title Assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions
title_short Assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions
title_full Assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions
title_fullStr Assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions
title_sort assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions
publisher International Glaciological Society
publishDate 2015
url https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/21640/
https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J116
https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/21640/1/Wake_L_glaciated_regions.pdf
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
Ice Sheet
Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Greenland
Ice Sheet
Journal of Glaciology
op_relation https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/21640/1/Wake_L_glaciated_regions.pdf
Wake, Leanne and Marshall, Shawn (2015) Assessment of current methods of positive degree-day calculation using in situ observations from glaciated regions. Journal of Glaciology, 61 (226). pp. 329-344. ISSN 0022-1430
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J116
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 61
container_issue 226
container_start_page 329
op_container_end_page 344
_version_ 1766019121145708544