How old are the eucalypts? A review of the microfossil and phylogenetic evidence

Molecular age estimates for the Eucalypteae (family Myrtaceae) suggest that the eucalypts, possibly associated with fire, have been present for ~65 million years. In contrast, macrofossils and fossil pollen attributable to three important eucalypt genera (Angophora, Corymbia and Eucalyptus) in the E...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Macphail, Mike, Thornhill, Andrew H, School of Environmental and Rural Science, orcid:0000-0002-0325-5725
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: CSIRO Publishing 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55064
id ftunivnewengland:oai:rune.une.edu.au:1959.11/55064
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnewengland:oai:rune.une.edu.au:1959.11/55064 2023-08-27T04:04:43+02:00 How old are the eucalypts? A review of the microfossil and phylogenetic evidence Macphail, Mike Thornhill, Andrew H School of Environmental and Rural Science orcid:0000-0002-0325-5725 2016-11-25 https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55064 en eng CSIRO Publishing 10.1071/BT16124 https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55064 une:1959.11/55064 Journal Article 2016 ftunivnewengland 2023-08-10T19:51:30Z Molecular age estimates for the Eucalypteae (family Myrtaceae) suggest that the eucalypts, possibly associated with fire, have been present for ~65 million years. In contrast, macrofossils and fossil pollen attributable to three important eucalypt genera (Angophora, Corymbia and Eucalyptus) in the Eucalypteae date to ~51–53 million years ago (mid-Early Eocene) in Patagonia, eastern Antarctica and south-eastern Australia. At present, there is no fossil evidence to show that eucalypts had evolved before this epoch, i.e. when Australia was part of eastern Gondwana, although this seems probable on the basis of molecular-dated phylogenetic analyses. The primary reason is the absence of macrofossils, whereas the earliest fossil eucalypt-type pollen recorded (Myrtaceidites tenuis) is attributed to Angophora and Corymbia, not Eucalyptus. This pollen type is recorded in Australia and Antarctica but not in New Zealand or South America. The only Myrtaceidites morphospecies found in Upper Cretaceous and Paleocene deposits in Australia is M. parvus, whose affinity lies with multiple extant Myrtaceae groups other than the Eucalypteae. In the present paper, we review current phylogenetic and microfossil databases for the eucalypts and assess this evidence to develop a 'consensus' position on the origin and evolution of the eucalypts in the Australian region. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Research UNE - University of New England at Armidale, NSW Australia New Zealand Patagonia
institution Open Polar
collection Research UNE - University of New England at Armidale, NSW Australia
op_collection_id ftunivnewengland
language English
description Molecular age estimates for the Eucalypteae (family Myrtaceae) suggest that the eucalypts, possibly associated with fire, have been present for ~65 million years. In contrast, macrofossils and fossil pollen attributable to three important eucalypt genera (Angophora, Corymbia and Eucalyptus) in the Eucalypteae date to ~51–53 million years ago (mid-Early Eocene) in Patagonia, eastern Antarctica and south-eastern Australia. At present, there is no fossil evidence to show that eucalypts had evolved before this epoch, i.e. when Australia was part of eastern Gondwana, although this seems probable on the basis of molecular-dated phylogenetic analyses. The primary reason is the absence of macrofossils, whereas the earliest fossil eucalypt-type pollen recorded (Myrtaceidites tenuis) is attributed to Angophora and Corymbia, not Eucalyptus. This pollen type is recorded in Australia and Antarctica but not in New Zealand or South America. The only Myrtaceidites morphospecies found in Upper Cretaceous and Paleocene deposits in Australia is M. parvus, whose affinity lies with multiple extant Myrtaceae groups other than the Eucalypteae. In the present paper, we review current phylogenetic and microfossil databases for the eucalypts and assess this evidence to develop a 'consensus' position on the origin and evolution of the eucalypts in the Australian region.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Macphail, Mike
Thornhill, Andrew H
School of Environmental and Rural Science
orcid:0000-0002-0325-5725
spellingShingle Macphail, Mike
Thornhill, Andrew H
School of Environmental and Rural Science
orcid:0000-0002-0325-5725
How old are the eucalypts? A review of the microfossil and phylogenetic evidence
author_facet Macphail, Mike
Thornhill, Andrew H
School of Environmental and Rural Science
orcid:0000-0002-0325-5725
author_sort Macphail, Mike
title How old are the eucalypts? A review of the microfossil and phylogenetic evidence
title_short How old are the eucalypts? A review of the microfossil and phylogenetic evidence
title_full How old are the eucalypts? A review of the microfossil and phylogenetic evidence
title_fullStr How old are the eucalypts? A review of the microfossil and phylogenetic evidence
title_full_unstemmed How old are the eucalypts? A review of the microfossil and phylogenetic evidence
title_sort how old are the eucalypts? a review of the microfossil and phylogenetic evidence
publisher CSIRO Publishing
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55064
geographic New Zealand
Patagonia
geographic_facet New Zealand
Patagonia
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_relation 10.1071/BT16124
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55064
une:1959.11/55064
_version_ 1775353079678369792