A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment

We investigate the influence of the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) on the deformation at the surface and at seismogenic depths in Fennoscandia. The surface strain rate field, derived from geodetic data, is controlled by GIA which causes NW-SE extension of up to 4 x 10(-)(9) yr(-1) in most of mai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Journal International
Main Authors: Keiding, M., Kreemer, Corne, Lindholm, C. D., Gradmann, S., Olesen, O., Kierulf, H. P.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11714/5934
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv207
id ftunivnevadair:oai:scholarworks.unr.edu:11714/5934
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnevadair:oai:scholarworks.unr.edu:11714/5934 2023-05-15T16:11:21+02:00 A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment Keiding, M. Kreemer, Corne Lindholm, C. D. Gradmann, S. Olesen, O. Kierulf, H. P. 2015 PDF http://hdl.handle.net/11714/5934 https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv207 unknown Keiding, M., Kreemer, C., Lindholm, C. D., Gradmann, S., Olesen, O., & Kierulf, H. P. (2015). A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment. Geophysical Journal International, 202(2), 1021–1028. doi:10.1093/gji/ggv207 0956-540X http://hdl.handle.net/11714/5934 doi:10.1093/gji/ggv207 In Copyright (All Rights Reserved) https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/access_purchase/rights_and_permissions/self_archiving_policy_p Authors https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv207 Neotectonics Seismicity and tectonics Intra-plate processes Lithospheric flexure Article 2015 ftunivnevadair https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv207 2020-12-09T10:19:20Z We investigate the influence of the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) on the deformation at the surface and at seismogenic depths in Fennoscandia. The surface strain rate field, derived from geodetic data, is controlled by GIA which causes NW-SE extension of up to 4 x 10(-)(9) yr(-1) in most of mainland Fennoscandia, surrounded by regions of radial shortening towards the centre of uplift. The seismic deformation field, derived from a new compilation of focal mechanisms, shows consistent NW-SE compression on the Norwegian continental margin and a tendency towards tension in mainland Fennoscandia. The seismic moment rate is at least two orders of magnitude smaller than the geodetic moment rate. We propose that the low level of seismicity and the tendency towards tensional focal mechanisms in mainland Fennoscandia may be explained by the destructive interference of the regional stress from ridge push with the flexural stress due to GIA. Article in Journal/Newspaper Fennoscandia University of Nevada, Reno: ScholarWorks Repository Geophysical Journal International 202 2 1021 1028
institution Open Polar
collection University of Nevada, Reno: ScholarWorks Repository
op_collection_id ftunivnevadair
language unknown
topic Neotectonics
Seismicity and tectonics
Intra-plate processes
Lithospheric flexure
spellingShingle Neotectonics
Seismicity and tectonics
Intra-plate processes
Lithospheric flexure
Keiding, M.
Kreemer, Corne
Lindholm, C. D.
Gradmann, S.
Olesen, O.
Kierulf, H. P.
A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment
topic_facet Neotectonics
Seismicity and tectonics
Intra-plate processes
Lithospheric flexure
description We investigate the influence of the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) on the deformation at the surface and at seismogenic depths in Fennoscandia. The surface strain rate field, derived from geodetic data, is controlled by GIA which causes NW-SE extension of up to 4 x 10(-)(9) yr(-1) in most of mainland Fennoscandia, surrounded by regions of radial shortening towards the centre of uplift. The seismic deformation field, derived from a new compilation of focal mechanisms, shows consistent NW-SE compression on the Norwegian continental margin and a tendency towards tension in mainland Fennoscandia. The seismic moment rate is at least two orders of magnitude smaller than the geodetic moment rate. We propose that the low level of seismicity and the tendency towards tensional focal mechanisms in mainland Fennoscandia may be explained by the destructive interference of the regional stress from ridge push with the flexural stress due to GIA.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Keiding, M.
Kreemer, Corne
Lindholm, C. D.
Gradmann, S.
Olesen, O.
Kierulf, H. P.
author_facet Keiding, M.
Kreemer, Corne
Lindholm, C. D.
Gradmann, S.
Olesen, O.
Kierulf, H. P.
author_sort Keiding, M.
title A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment
title_short A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment
title_full A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment
title_fullStr A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment
title_sort comparison of strain rates and seismicity for fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/11714/5934
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv207
genre Fennoscandia
genre_facet Fennoscandia
op_source https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv207
op_relation Keiding, M., Kreemer, C., Lindholm, C. D., Gradmann, S., Olesen, O., & Kierulf, H. P. (2015). A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment. Geophysical Journal International, 202(2), 1021–1028. doi:10.1093/gji/ggv207
0956-540X
http://hdl.handle.net/11714/5934
doi:10.1093/gji/ggv207
op_rights In Copyright (All Rights Reserved)
https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/access_purchase/rights_and_permissions/self_archiving_policy_p
Authors
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv207
container_title Geophysical Journal International
container_volume 202
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1021
op_container_end_page 1028
_version_ 1765996487913766912