A Preliminary Note on Trichinosis Investigations in Alaska

• Main Authors: Brandly, P. J., Rausch, Robert L.
• Format: Text
• Language: unknown
• Published: DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln 1950
• Subjects: Parasitology; Arctic; Greenland; Arctic Fox; Brooks Range; Canis lupus; Delphinapterus leucas; eskimo*; White whale; Alaska
• Online Access: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/500; https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/parasitologyfacpubs/article/1511/viewcontent/Rausch_1950_ARCTIC_A_Preliminary_Note_on_Trichinosis_Investigations_in_Alaska.pdf

Trichinosis in the arctic regions of the world has received considerable attention during recent years, particularly since the work of Roth (1948) in Greenland. In Connell's (1949) review of arctic trichinosis some Alaskan and Canadian records were included but, until now, little has been known of the status of the disease in Alaska. Information available at the present time indicates that the incidence of trichinosis is high in circumpolar carnivores and that marine mammals have a definite place in its epizootiology. Present knowledge cannot explain the survival of trichinosis in marine mammal populations, but it is evident that they may serve as important sources of human infection. Up to the present time the following mammals from Alaska have been found to be infected: From the arctic coast-polar bear, Thalarctas maritimus; arctic fox, Alapex lagapus irmuitus; red fox, Vulpes fulva alascemis; white whale, Delphinapterus leucas; Eskimo dog. From south of the Brooks Range--brown and grizzly bears, Ursus spp.; wolf, Canis lupus ssp.; wolverine. Gula l. luscus. At the time of writing, nearly ail species of land carnivores in Alaska have been examined as well as many other mammalian species less likely to be infected, including various rodents, shrews, and others.