Dental microwear as a behavioral proxy for distinguishing between canids at the Upper Paleolithic (Gravettian) site of Predmostí, Czech Republic

• Main Authors: Prassack, Kari A., DuBois, Josephine, Laznickova-Galetova, Martina, Germonpre, Mietje, Ungar, Peter S.
• Format: Text
• Language: unknown
• Published: DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln 2020
• Subjects: Canis familiaris; Canis lupus; Dog domestication; Dietary behavior; Upper paleolithic/palaeolithic; Environmental Education; Environmental Policy; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Fire Science and Firefighting; Leisure Studies; Natural Resource Economics; Natural Resources Management and Policy; Nature and Society Relations; Other Environmental Sciences; Physical and Environmental Geography; Public Administration; Public Affairs; Public Policy and Public Administration; Recreation; Parks and Tourism Administration
• Online Access: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark/211; https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/natlpark/article/1212/viewcontent/Prassack_JAS_2020_Dental_microwear.pdf

Morphological and genetic evidence put dog domestication during the Paleolithic, sometime between 40,000 and 15,000 years ago, with identification of the earliest dogs debated. We predict that these earliest dogs (referred to herein as protodogs), while potentially difficult to distinguish morphologically from wolves, experienced behavioral shifts, including changes in diet. Specifically, protodogs may have consumed more bone and other less desirable scraps within human settlement areas. Here we apply Dental Microwear Texture Analysis (DMTA) to canids from the Gravettian site of P�redmostí (approx. 28,500 BP), which were previously assigned to the Paleolithic dog or Pleistocene wolf morphotypes. We test whether these groups separate out significantly by diet- related variation in microwear patterning. Results are consistent with differences in dietary breadth, with the Paleolithic dog morphotype showing evidence of greater durophagy than those assigned to the wolf morphotype. This supports the presence of two morphologically and behaviorally distinct canid types at this middle Upper Paleolithic site. Our primary goal here was to test whether these two morphotypes expressed notable differences in dietary behavior. However, in the context of a major Gravettian settlement, this may also support evidence of early stage dog domestication. Dental microwear is a behavioral signal that may appear generations before morphological changes are established in a population. It shows promise for distinguishing protodogs from wolves in the Pleistocene and domesticated dogs from wolves elsewhere in the archaeological record.