Spatial Partitioning of Predation Risk in a Multiple Predator–Multiple Prey System

Minimizing risk of predation from multiple predators can be difficult, particularly when the risk effects of one predator species may influence vulnerability to a second predator species. We decomposed spatial risk of predation in a 2-predator, 2-prey system into relative risk of encounter and, give...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atwood, Todd C., Gese, Eric, Kunkel, Kyran
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/871
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/icwdm_usdanwrc/article/1857/viewcontent/Atwood_JWM_2009_Spatial_partitioning.pdf
id ftunivnebraskali:oai:digitalcommons.unl.edu:icwdm_usdanwrc-1857
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnebraskali:oai:digitalcommons.unl.edu:icwdm_usdanwrc-1857 2023-11-12T04:15:40+01:00 Spatial Partitioning of Predation Risk in a Multiple Predator–Multiple Prey System Atwood, Todd C. Gese, Eric Kunkel, Kyran 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/871 https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/icwdm_usdanwrc/article/1857/viewcontent/Atwood_JWM_2009_Spatial_partitioning.pdf unknown DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/871 https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/icwdm_usdanwrc/article/1857/viewcontent/Atwood_JWM_2009_Spatial_partitioning.pdf USDA Wildlife Services - Staff Publications Environmental Sciences text 2009 ftunivnebraskali 2023-10-30T10:43:18Z Minimizing risk of predation from multiple predators can be difficult, particularly when the risk effects of one predator species may influence vulnerability to a second predator species. We decomposed spatial risk of predation in a 2-predator, 2-prey system into relative risk of encounter and, given an encounter, conditional relative risk of being killed. Then, we generated spatially explicit functions of total risk of predation for each prey species (elk [Cervus elaphus] and mule deer [Odocoileus hemionus]) by combining risks of encounter and kill. For both mule deer and elk, topographic and vegetation type effects, along with resource selection by their primary predator (cougars [Puma concolor] and wolves [Canis lupus], respectively), strongly influenced risk of encounter. Following an encounter, topographic and vegetation type effects altered the risk of predation for both ungulates. For mule deer, risk of direct predation was largely a function of cougar resource selection. However, for elk, risk of direct predation was not only a function of wolf occurrence, but also of habitat attributes that increased elk vulnerability to predation following an encounter. Our analysis of stage-based (i.e., encounter and kill) predation indicates that the risk effect of elk shifting to structurally complex habitat may ameliorate risk of direct predation by wolves but exacerbate risk of direct predation by cougars. Information on spatiotemporal patterns of predation will be become increasingly important as state agencies in the western United States face pressure to integrate predator and prey management. Text Canis lupus University of Nebraska-Lincoln: DigitalCommons@UNL
institution Open Polar
collection University of Nebraska-Lincoln: DigitalCommons@UNL
op_collection_id ftunivnebraskali
language unknown
topic Environmental Sciences
spellingShingle Environmental Sciences
Atwood, Todd C.
Gese, Eric
Kunkel, Kyran
Spatial Partitioning of Predation Risk in a Multiple Predator–Multiple Prey System
topic_facet Environmental Sciences
description Minimizing risk of predation from multiple predators can be difficult, particularly when the risk effects of one predator species may influence vulnerability to a second predator species. We decomposed spatial risk of predation in a 2-predator, 2-prey system into relative risk of encounter and, given an encounter, conditional relative risk of being killed. Then, we generated spatially explicit functions of total risk of predation for each prey species (elk [Cervus elaphus] and mule deer [Odocoileus hemionus]) by combining risks of encounter and kill. For both mule deer and elk, topographic and vegetation type effects, along with resource selection by their primary predator (cougars [Puma concolor] and wolves [Canis lupus], respectively), strongly influenced risk of encounter. Following an encounter, topographic and vegetation type effects altered the risk of predation for both ungulates. For mule deer, risk of direct predation was largely a function of cougar resource selection. However, for elk, risk of direct predation was not only a function of wolf occurrence, but also of habitat attributes that increased elk vulnerability to predation following an encounter. Our analysis of stage-based (i.e., encounter and kill) predation indicates that the risk effect of elk shifting to structurally complex habitat may ameliorate risk of direct predation by wolves but exacerbate risk of direct predation by cougars. Information on spatiotemporal patterns of predation will be become increasingly important as state agencies in the western United States face pressure to integrate predator and prey management.
format Text
author Atwood, Todd C.
Gese, Eric
Kunkel, Kyran
author_facet Atwood, Todd C.
Gese, Eric
Kunkel, Kyran
author_sort Atwood, Todd C.
title Spatial Partitioning of Predation Risk in a Multiple Predator–Multiple Prey System
title_short Spatial Partitioning of Predation Risk in a Multiple Predator–Multiple Prey System
title_full Spatial Partitioning of Predation Risk in a Multiple Predator–Multiple Prey System
title_fullStr Spatial Partitioning of Predation Risk in a Multiple Predator–Multiple Prey System
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Partitioning of Predation Risk in a Multiple Predator–Multiple Prey System
title_sort spatial partitioning of predation risk in a multiple predator–multiple prey system
publisher DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
publishDate 2009
url https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/871
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/icwdm_usdanwrc/article/1857/viewcontent/Atwood_JWM_2009_Spatial_partitioning.pdf
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source USDA Wildlife Services - Staff Publications
op_relation https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/871
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/icwdm_usdanwrc/article/1857/viewcontent/Atwood_JWM_2009_Spatial_partitioning.pdf
_version_ 1782332961498071040