Hazing of Canada geese is unlikely to reduce nuisance populations in urban and suburban communities
Growing populations of resident Canada geese (Branta canadensis) have caused increased nuisance problems in urban and suburban communities. Hazing, or persistent harassment, is often recommended as a nonlethal management strategy to alleviate these problems. Does hazing simply cause a local redistri...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hwi/97 https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/hwi/article/1096/viewcontent/Holevinski_257.pdf |
id |
ftunivnebraskali:oai:digitalcommons.unl.edu:hwi-1096 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivnebraskali:oai:digitalcommons.unl.edu:hwi-1096 2023-11-12T04:15:26+01:00 Hazing of Canada geese is unlikely to reduce nuisance populations in urban and suburban communities Holevinski, Robin A Curtis, Paul D. Malecki, Richard A 2007-01-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hwi/97 https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/hwi/article/1096/viewcontent/Holevinski_257.pdf unknown DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hwi/97 https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/hwi/article/1096/viewcontent/Holevinski_257.pdf Human–Wildlife Interactions border collies Branta canadensis Canada geese hazing human–wildlife conflicts hunting mortality lasers nuisance control pyrotechnics remote-controlled boat Environmental Health and Protection text 2007 ftunivnebraskali 2023-10-30T10:39:17Z Growing populations of resident Canada geese (Branta canadensis) have caused increased nuisance problems in urban and suburban communities. Hazing, or persistent harassment, is often recommended as a nonlethal management strategy to alleviate these problems. Does hazing simply cause a local redistribution of birds, or can it solve nuisance problems by pushing geese to rural areas where hunting mortality could reduce the population? To answer this question, we marked 368 adult and 400 juvenile geese with leg bands in 1 urban and 1 suburban community in western New York State during June 2002 and 2003. This sample included 30 adult females with radio-transmitters and 151 adults with individually coded neck bands. From August 15 to September 25 and October 25 to November 15, we subjected these geese and their flock mates to post-molt hazing with border collies, lasers, pyrotechnics, remote-controlled boats, strobe lights, kayaks, a goose distress call device, or a combination of these techniques. Hazing was most successful using border collies in conjunction with remote-controlled boats (>90% of geese removed in 97% of 37 events), border collies alone (94% of 113 events), and nocturnal use of lasers (64% of 134 events). Radio-marked individuals demonstrated a strong affinity to hazing sites, averaging 16.9 hazing events per individual. Geese moved to areas where hazing was not permitted and were available for hazing only 51% of the time (n = 739). Geese moved 1.18 km (SD = 0.91) events, which was not far enough to place them in areas open to hunting. Although hunting was permitted >5 km from hazing treatment sites, only 13% (SE = 0.01) of adult geese and 7% (SE = 0.01) of juveniles were harvested in 2 years. Hazing alone is unlikely to reduce goose populations in urban and suburban communities by exposing them to hunting in adjacent rural areas. Text Branta canadensis University of Nebraska-Lincoln: DigitalCommons@UNL Canada |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Nebraska-Lincoln: DigitalCommons@UNL |
op_collection_id |
ftunivnebraskali |
language |
unknown |
topic |
border collies Branta canadensis Canada geese hazing human–wildlife conflicts hunting mortality lasers nuisance control pyrotechnics remote-controlled boat Environmental Health and Protection |
spellingShingle |
border collies Branta canadensis Canada geese hazing human–wildlife conflicts hunting mortality lasers nuisance control pyrotechnics remote-controlled boat Environmental Health and Protection Holevinski, Robin A Curtis, Paul D. Malecki, Richard A Hazing of Canada geese is unlikely to reduce nuisance populations in urban and suburban communities |
topic_facet |
border collies Branta canadensis Canada geese hazing human–wildlife conflicts hunting mortality lasers nuisance control pyrotechnics remote-controlled boat Environmental Health and Protection |
description |
Growing populations of resident Canada geese (Branta canadensis) have caused increased nuisance problems in urban and suburban communities. Hazing, or persistent harassment, is often recommended as a nonlethal management strategy to alleviate these problems. Does hazing simply cause a local redistribution of birds, or can it solve nuisance problems by pushing geese to rural areas where hunting mortality could reduce the population? To answer this question, we marked 368 adult and 400 juvenile geese with leg bands in 1 urban and 1 suburban community in western New York State during June 2002 and 2003. This sample included 30 adult females with radio-transmitters and 151 adults with individually coded neck bands. From August 15 to September 25 and October 25 to November 15, we subjected these geese and their flock mates to post-molt hazing with border collies, lasers, pyrotechnics, remote-controlled boats, strobe lights, kayaks, a goose distress call device, or a combination of these techniques. Hazing was most successful using border collies in conjunction with remote-controlled boats (>90% of geese removed in 97% of 37 events), border collies alone (94% of 113 events), and nocturnal use of lasers (64% of 134 events). Radio-marked individuals demonstrated a strong affinity to hazing sites, averaging 16.9 hazing events per individual. Geese moved to areas where hazing was not permitted and were available for hazing only 51% of the time (n = 739). Geese moved 1.18 km (SD = 0.91) events, which was not far enough to place them in areas open to hunting. Although hunting was permitted >5 km from hazing treatment sites, only 13% (SE = 0.01) of adult geese and 7% (SE = 0.01) of juveniles were harvested in 2 years. Hazing alone is unlikely to reduce goose populations in urban and suburban communities by exposing them to hunting in adjacent rural areas. |
format |
Text |
author |
Holevinski, Robin A Curtis, Paul D. Malecki, Richard A |
author_facet |
Holevinski, Robin A Curtis, Paul D. Malecki, Richard A |
author_sort |
Holevinski, Robin A |
title |
Hazing of Canada geese is unlikely to reduce nuisance populations in urban and suburban communities |
title_short |
Hazing of Canada geese is unlikely to reduce nuisance populations in urban and suburban communities |
title_full |
Hazing of Canada geese is unlikely to reduce nuisance populations in urban and suburban communities |
title_fullStr |
Hazing of Canada geese is unlikely to reduce nuisance populations in urban and suburban communities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hazing of Canada geese is unlikely to reduce nuisance populations in urban and suburban communities |
title_sort |
hazing of canada geese is unlikely to reduce nuisance populations in urban and suburban communities |
publisher |
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hwi/97 https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/hwi/article/1096/viewcontent/Holevinski_257.pdf |
geographic |
Canada |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
genre |
Branta canadensis |
genre_facet |
Branta canadensis |
op_source |
Human–Wildlife Interactions |
op_relation |
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hwi/97 https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/hwi/article/1096/viewcontent/Holevinski_257.pdf |
_version_ |
1782332724847050752 |