Spatial distribution and possible sources of SMOS errors at the global scale

SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) data have now been available for over two years and, as part of the validation process, comparing this new dataset to already existing global datasets of soil moisture is possible. In this study, SMOS soil moisture product was evaluated globally by using the t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing of Environment
Main Authors: Leroux, Delphine, Kerr, Yann H., Richaume, Philippe, Fieuzal, Rémy
Other Authors: Centre d'études spatiales de la biosphère (CESBIO), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Telespazio, Services par satellites
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769
https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769/document
https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769/file/2013RSE_spatial_distribution.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017
id ftunivnantes:oai:HAL:ird-00828769v1
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Université de Nantes: HAL-UNIV-NANTES
op_collection_id ftunivnantes
language English
topic Triple collocation
SMOS
Error structure
Soil moisture
Multiple linear regression
Analysis of variance
[SDV.EE.ECO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology
environment/Ecosystems
spellingShingle Triple collocation
SMOS
Error structure
Soil moisture
Multiple linear regression
Analysis of variance
[SDV.EE.ECO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology
environment/Ecosystems
Leroux, Delphine
Kerr, Yann H.
Richaume, Philippe
Fieuzal, Rémy
Spatial distribution and possible sources of SMOS errors at the global scale
topic_facet Triple collocation
SMOS
Error structure
Soil moisture
Multiple linear regression
Analysis of variance
[SDV.EE.ECO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology
environment/Ecosystems
description SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) data have now been available for over two years and, as part of the validation process, comparing this new dataset to already existing global datasets of soil moisture is possible. In this study, SMOS soil moisture product was evaluated globally by using the triple collocation method. This statistical method is based on the comparison of three datasets and produces global error maps by statistically inter-comparing their variations. Only the variable part of the errors are considered here, the bias errors are not treated by triple collocation. This method was applied to the following datasets: SMOS Level 2 product, two soil moisture products derived from AMSR-E (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer)-LPRM (Land Parameter Retrieval Model) and NSIDC (National Snow and Ice Data Center), ASCAT (Advanced Scatterometer) and ECMWF (European Center for Medium range Weather Forecasting). The resulting errors are not absolute since they depend on the choice of the datasets. However this study showed that the spatial structure of the SMOS was independent of the combination and pointed out the same areas where SMOS performed well and where it did not. This global SMOS error map was then linked to other global parameters such as soil texture, RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) occurrence probabilities and land cover in order to identify their influences in the SMOS error. Globally the presence of forest in the field of view of the radiometer seemed to have the greatest influence on SMOS error (56.8%) whereas RFI represented 1.7% according to the analysis of variance from a multiple linear regression model. These percentages were not identical for all the continents and some discrepancies in the proportion of the influence were highlighted: soil texture was the main influence over Europe whereas RFI had the largest influence over Asia.
author2 Centre d'études spatiales de la biosphère (CESBIO)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP)
Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Telespazio
Services par satellites
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Leroux, Delphine
Kerr, Yann H.
Richaume, Philippe
Fieuzal, Rémy
author_facet Leroux, Delphine
Kerr, Yann H.
Richaume, Philippe
Fieuzal, Rémy
author_sort Leroux, Delphine
title Spatial distribution and possible sources of SMOS errors at the global scale
title_short Spatial distribution and possible sources of SMOS errors at the global scale
title_full Spatial distribution and possible sources of SMOS errors at the global scale
title_fullStr Spatial distribution and possible sources of SMOS errors at the global scale
title_full_unstemmed Spatial distribution and possible sources of SMOS errors at the global scale
title_sort spatial distribution and possible sources of smos errors at the global scale
publisher HAL CCSD
publishDate 2013
url https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769
https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769/document
https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769/file/2013RSE_spatial_distribution.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017
genre National Snow and Ice Data Center
genre_facet National Snow and Ice Data Center
op_source ISSN: 0034-4257
EISSN: 1879-0704
Remote Sensing of Environment
https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769
Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, 133, pp.240-250. ⟨10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017⟩
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017
ird-00828769
https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769
https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769/document
https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769/file/2013RSE_spatial_distribution.pdf
doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017
container_title Remote Sensing of Environment
container_volume 133
container_start_page 240
op_container_end_page 250
_version_ 1766071719259275264
spelling ftunivnantes:oai:HAL:ird-00828769v1 2023-05-15T17:14:21+02:00 Spatial distribution and possible sources of SMOS errors at the global scale Leroux, Delphine Kerr, Yann H. Richaume, Philippe Fieuzal, Rémy Centre d'études spatiales de la biosphère (CESBIO) Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3) Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP) Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) Telespazio Services par satellites 2013 https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769 https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769/document https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769/file/2013RSE_spatial_distribution.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017 en eng HAL CCSD Elsevier info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017 ird-00828769 https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769 https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769/document https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769/file/2013RSE_spatial_distribution.pdf doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017 info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess ISSN: 0034-4257 EISSN: 1879-0704 Remote Sensing of Environment https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00828769 Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, 133, pp.240-250. ⟨10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017⟩ Triple collocation SMOS Error structure Soil moisture Multiple linear regression Analysis of variance [SDV.EE.ECO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology environment/Ecosystems info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2013 ftunivnantes https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.017 2023-02-22T00:01:33Z SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) data have now been available for over two years and, as part of the validation process, comparing this new dataset to already existing global datasets of soil moisture is possible. In this study, SMOS soil moisture product was evaluated globally by using the triple collocation method. This statistical method is based on the comparison of three datasets and produces global error maps by statistically inter-comparing their variations. Only the variable part of the errors are considered here, the bias errors are not treated by triple collocation. This method was applied to the following datasets: SMOS Level 2 product, two soil moisture products derived from AMSR-E (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer)-LPRM (Land Parameter Retrieval Model) and NSIDC (National Snow and Ice Data Center), ASCAT (Advanced Scatterometer) and ECMWF (European Center for Medium range Weather Forecasting). The resulting errors are not absolute since they depend on the choice of the datasets. However this study showed that the spatial structure of the SMOS was independent of the combination and pointed out the same areas where SMOS performed well and where it did not. This global SMOS error map was then linked to other global parameters such as soil texture, RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) occurrence probabilities and land cover in order to identify their influences in the SMOS error. Globally the presence of forest in the field of view of the radiometer seemed to have the greatest influence on SMOS error (56.8%) whereas RFI represented 1.7% according to the analysis of variance from a multiple linear regression model. These percentages were not identical for all the continents and some discrepancies in the proportion of the influence were highlighted: soil texture was the main influence over Europe whereas RFI had the largest influence over Asia. Article in Journal/Newspaper National Snow and Ice Data Center Université de Nantes: HAL-UNIV-NANTES Remote Sensing of Environment 133 240 250