Implementating the EU's 2008 wine reform: Differentiated institutionalisation compared
International audience In 2008, the Council of the European Union (EU) adopted a regulation (479/2008) which claimed to radically reform its Common Market Organization (CMO) for wine and thereby the regulation of this industry in Europe . To borrow Peter Hall's well known typology of 'soci...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Conference Object |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00631386 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00631386/document https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00631386/file/gedivinimplementECPR.pdf |
Summary: | International audience In 2008, the Council of the European Union (EU) adopted a regulation (479/2008) which claimed to radically reform its Common Market Organization (CMO) for wine and thereby the regulation of this industry in Europe . To borrow Peter Hall's well known typology of 'social learning' (1993), this legislation did indeed appear to herald a 'third order change' because it incorporated not only a recalibration of policy instruments (1st order) and their partial replacement (2nd order), but also change in both the European wine industry's hierarchy of objectives, as well as the values around which they have been justified. |
---|