Neutrino mass ordering determination through combined analysis with JUNO and KM3NeT/ORCA

• Published in: Journal of Instrumentation
• Main Authors: Chau, N., Athayde Marcondes de André, J.P., van Elewyck, V., Kouchner, A., Kalousis, L., Dracos, M.
• Other Authors: AstroParticule et Cosmologie (APC (UMR_7164)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien (IPHC), Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche (M.E.N.E.S.R.), KM3NeT, JUNO members
• Format: Conference Object
• Language: English
• Published: HAL CCSD 2021
• Subjects: Neutrino detectors; Analysis and statistical methods; Performance of High Energy Physics Detectors; neutrino: mass; neutrino: oscillation; JUNO; sensitivity; KM3NeT; experimental results; statistics; statistical analysis; performance; [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-INS-DET]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Instrumentation and Detectors [physics.ins-det]; Orca
• Online Access: https://hal.science/hal-03472128; https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/16/11/C11007

International audience The neutrino mass ordering (NMO) is one of the fundamental questions in neutrino physics. KM3NeT/ORCA and JUNO are two neutrino oscillation experiments both aiming at measuring the NMO with different approaches: ORCA with atmospheric neutrinos traversing the Earth and JUNO with reactor neutrinos. This contribution presents the potential of determining the NMO through a combined analysis of JUNO and ORCA data. In a joint fit, the NMO sensitivity is enhanced beyond the simple sum of the sensitivities of each experiment due to the tension between the respective Δm$_{31}^{2}$ best fit values obtained when the wrong ordering is assumed, together with good constraints on this parameter measurement by both experiments. From this analysis, we expect the true NMO to be determined with 5σ significance after 1–2 years of data taking by both experiments for the current global best-fit values of the oscillation parameters, while maximally 6 years will be needed for any other parameter set.