Comparison of fully non linear and weakly nonlinear potential flow solvers for the study of wave energy converters undergoing large amplitude of motions

International audience We present a comparison between two distinct numerical codes dedicated to the study of wave energy converters. Both are developed by the authors, using a boundary element method with linear triangular elements. One model applies fully nonlin-ear boundary conditions in a numeri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Volume 9B: Ocean Renewable Energy
Main Authors: Letournel, Lucas, Harris, Jeffrey C., Ferrant, Pierre, Babarit, Aurélien, Ducrozet, Guillaume, Benoit, Michel, Dombre, Emmanuel
Other Authors: Laboratoire de recherche en Hydrodynamique, Énergétique et Environnement Atmosphérique (LHEEA), École Centrale de Nantes (ECN)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire d'Hydraulique Saint-Venant / Saint-Venant laboratory for Hydraulics (LHSV), École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-EDF R&D (EDF R&D), EDF (EDF)-EDF (EDF)
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal.science/hal-01199157
https://hal.science/hal-01199157/document
https://hal.science/hal-01199157/file/Letournel2014.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23912
id ftunivnantes:oai:HAL:hal-01199157v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnantes:oai:HAL:hal-01199157v1 2023-10-29T02:32:55+01:00 Comparison of fully non linear and weakly nonlinear potential flow solvers for the study of wave energy converters undergoing large amplitude of motions Letournel, Lucas Harris, Jeffrey C. Ferrant, Pierre Babarit, Aurélien Ducrozet, Guillaume Benoit, Michel Dombre, Emmanuel Laboratoire de recherche en Hydrodynamique, Énergétique et Environnement Atmosphérique (LHEEA) École Centrale de Nantes (ECN)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Laboratoire d'Hydraulique Saint-Venant / Saint-Venant laboratory for Hydraulics (LHSV) École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-EDF R&D (EDF R&D) EDF (EDF)-EDF (EDF) San Francisco, United States 2014-06-08 https://hal.science/hal-01199157 https://hal.science/hal-01199157/document https://hal.science/hal-01199157/file/Letournel2014.pdf https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23912 en eng HAL CCSD info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1115/OMAE2014-23912 hal-01199157 https://hal.science/hal-01199157 https://hal.science/hal-01199157/document https://hal.science/hal-01199157/file/Letournel2014.pdf doi:10.1115/OMAE2014-23912 info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering ASME 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Artic Engineering (OMAE2014) https://hal.science/hal-01199157 ASME 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Artic Engineering (OMAE2014), Jun 2014, San Francisco, United States. ⟨10.1115/OMAE2014-23912⟩ [SPI.MECA.MEFL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph] [SPI.NRJ]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electric power info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conference papers 2014 ftunivnantes https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23912 2023-10-03T22:41:57Z International audience We present a comparison between two distinct numerical codes dedicated to the study of wave energy converters. Both are developed by the authors, using a boundary element method with linear triangular elements. One model applies fully nonlin-ear boundary conditions in a numerical wavetank environnment (and thus referred later as NWT), whereas the second relies on a weak-scatterer approach in open-domain and can be considered a weakly nonlinear potential code (referred later as WSC). For the purposes of comparison, we limit our study to the forces on a heaving submerged sphere. Additional results for more realistic problem geometries will be presented at the conference. INTRODUCTION Among the marine renewable energy sources, wave energy is a promising option. Despite the great number of technologies that have been proposed, currently no wave energy converter (WEC) has proven its superiority over others and become a technological solution. Usual numerical tools for modeling and designing WECs are based on boundary elements methods in linear potential theory [1-4]. However WECs efficiency relies on large amplitude motions [5], with a design of their resonance frequencies in the wave excitation. Linear potential theory is thus inadequate to study the behavior of WEC in such configuration. Conference Object Arctic Université de Nantes: HAL-UNIV-NANTES Volume 9B: Ocean Renewable Energy
institution Open Polar
collection Université de Nantes: HAL-UNIV-NANTES
op_collection_id ftunivnantes
language English
topic [SPI.MECA.MEFL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph]
[SPI.NRJ]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electric power
spellingShingle [SPI.MECA.MEFL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph]
[SPI.NRJ]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electric power
Letournel, Lucas
Harris, Jeffrey C.
Ferrant, Pierre
Babarit, Aurélien
Ducrozet, Guillaume
Benoit, Michel
Dombre, Emmanuel
Comparison of fully non linear and weakly nonlinear potential flow solvers for the study of wave energy converters undergoing large amplitude of motions
topic_facet [SPI.MECA.MEFL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph]
[SPI.NRJ]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electric power
description International audience We present a comparison between two distinct numerical codes dedicated to the study of wave energy converters. Both are developed by the authors, using a boundary element method with linear triangular elements. One model applies fully nonlin-ear boundary conditions in a numerical wavetank environnment (and thus referred later as NWT), whereas the second relies on a weak-scatterer approach in open-domain and can be considered a weakly nonlinear potential code (referred later as WSC). For the purposes of comparison, we limit our study to the forces on a heaving submerged sphere. Additional results for more realistic problem geometries will be presented at the conference. INTRODUCTION Among the marine renewable energy sources, wave energy is a promising option. Despite the great number of technologies that have been proposed, currently no wave energy converter (WEC) has proven its superiority over others and become a technological solution. Usual numerical tools for modeling and designing WECs are based on boundary elements methods in linear potential theory [1-4]. However WECs efficiency relies on large amplitude motions [5], with a design of their resonance frequencies in the wave excitation. Linear potential theory is thus inadequate to study the behavior of WEC in such configuration.
author2 Laboratoire de recherche en Hydrodynamique, Énergétique et Environnement Atmosphérique (LHEEA)
École Centrale de Nantes (ECN)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Laboratoire d'Hydraulique Saint-Venant / Saint-Venant laboratory for Hydraulics (LHSV)
École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-EDF R&D (EDF R&D)
EDF (EDF)-EDF (EDF)
format Conference Object
author Letournel, Lucas
Harris, Jeffrey C.
Ferrant, Pierre
Babarit, Aurélien
Ducrozet, Guillaume
Benoit, Michel
Dombre, Emmanuel
author_facet Letournel, Lucas
Harris, Jeffrey C.
Ferrant, Pierre
Babarit, Aurélien
Ducrozet, Guillaume
Benoit, Michel
Dombre, Emmanuel
author_sort Letournel, Lucas
title Comparison of fully non linear and weakly nonlinear potential flow solvers for the study of wave energy converters undergoing large amplitude of motions
title_short Comparison of fully non linear and weakly nonlinear potential flow solvers for the study of wave energy converters undergoing large amplitude of motions
title_full Comparison of fully non linear and weakly nonlinear potential flow solvers for the study of wave energy converters undergoing large amplitude of motions
title_fullStr Comparison of fully non linear and weakly nonlinear potential flow solvers for the study of wave energy converters undergoing large amplitude of motions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fully non linear and weakly nonlinear potential flow solvers for the study of wave energy converters undergoing large amplitude of motions
title_sort comparison of fully non linear and weakly nonlinear potential flow solvers for the study of wave energy converters undergoing large amplitude of motions
publisher HAL CCSD
publishDate 2014
url https://hal.science/hal-01199157
https://hal.science/hal-01199157/document
https://hal.science/hal-01199157/file/Letournel2014.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23912
op_coverage San Francisco, United States
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
ASME 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Artic Engineering (OMAE2014)
https://hal.science/hal-01199157
ASME 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Artic Engineering (OMAE2014), Jun 2014, San Francisco, United States. ⟨10.1115/OMAE2014-23912⟩
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1115/OMAE2014-23912
hal-01199157
https://hal.science/hal-01199157
https://hal.science/hal-01199157/document
https://hal.science/hal-01199157/file/Letournel2014.pdf
doi:10.1115/OMAE2014-23912
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23912
container_title Volume 9B: Ocean Renewable Energy
_version_ 1781054846497980416