The European regulatory response to the volcanic ash crisis between fragmentation and integration

International audience More than twenty years after the EU eliminated its internal land borders, the Union still lacks an integrated airspace. This seems to be the most immediate regulatory lesson of the recent volcanic ash crisis. In this brief report, I will provide a first-hand analysis of the re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alemanno, Alberto
Other Authors: Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC (GREGH), Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC Paris)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537063
id ftunivnantes:oai:HAL:hal-00537063v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnantes:oai:HAL:hal-00537063v1 2023-05-15T16:09:39+02:00 The European regulatory response to the volcanic ash crisis between fragmentation and integration Alemanno, Alberto Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC (GREGH) Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC Paris)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 2010 https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537063 en eng HAL CCSD Cambridge University Press hal-00537063 https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537063 ISSN: 1867-299X EISSN: 2190-8249 European Journal of Risk Regulation https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537063 European Journal of Risk Regulation, Cambridge University Press, 2010, 2, pp.NC Risk Regulation EU law Precationary principle Volcanic ash Emergency Regulation Eurocontrol EASA Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Worst-case scenarios [SHS.GESTION.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration/domain_shs.gestion.droit info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2010 ftunivnantes 2022-06-28T23:45:58Z International audience More than twenty years after the EU eliminated its internal land borders, the Union still lacks an integrated airspace. This seems to be the most immediate regulatory lesson of the recent volcanic ash crisis. In this brief report, I will provide a first-hand analysis of the regulatory answer developed across Europe in the aftermath of the eruption of the Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull. While reconstructing the unfolding of the events and the procedures followed by the regulators, I will attempt to address some of the questions that I have repeatedly asked myself when stranded in Washington DC between 16 and 25 April 2010. Who did the assessment of the hazard posed by volcanic ash to jetliners? Who was competent to take risk management decisions, such as the controversial flight bans? Is it true that the safe level of volcanic ash was zero? How to explain the shift to a new safety threshold (of 2,000 mg/m3) only five days after the event? Did regulators overact? To what extent did they manage the perceived risk rather than the actual one? At a time when the impact of the volcanic ash cloud crisis is being closely scrutinised by both public authorities and the affected industries, it seems particularly timely to establish what happened during the worst aviation crisis in European history. This report was written one week after the event and relied on a limited number of sources available by 30 April 2010. Article in Journal/Newspaper Eyjafjallajökull Université de Nantes: HAL-UNIV-NANTES
institution Open Polar
collection Université de Nantes: HAL-UNIV-NANTES
op_collection_id ftunivnantes
language English
topic Risk Regulation
EU law
Precationary principle
Volcanic ash
Emergency Regulation
Eurocontrol
EASA
Single European Sky
Air Traffic Management
Worst-case scenarios
[SHS.GESTION.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration/domain_shs.gestion.droit
spellingShingle Risk Regulation
EU law
Precationary principle
Volcanic ash
Emergency Regulation
Eurocontrol
EASA
Single European Sky
Air Traffic Management
Worst-case scenarios
[SHS.GESTION.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration/domain_shs.gestion.droit
Alemanno, Alberto
The European regulatory response to the volcanic ash crisis between fragmentation and integration
topic_facet Risk Regulation
EU law
Precationary principle
Volcanic ash
Emergency Regulation
Eurocontrol
EASA
Single European Sky
Air Traffic Management
Worst-case scenarios
[SHS.GESTION.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration/domain_shs.gestion.droit
description International audience More than twenty years after the EU eliminated its internal land borders, the Union still lacks an integrated airspace. This seems to be the most immediate regulatory lesson of the recent volcanic ash crisis. In this brief report, I will provide a first-hand analysis of the regulatory answer developed across Europe in the aftermath of the eruption of the Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull. While reconstructing the unfolding of the events and the procedures followed by the regulators, I will attempt to address some of the questions that I have repeatedly asked myself when stranded in Washington DC between 16 and 25 April 2010. Who did the assessment of the hazard posed by volcanic ash to jetliners? Who was competent to take risk management decisions, such as the controversial flight bans? Is it true that the safe level of volcanic ash was zero? How to explain the shift to a new safety threshold (of 2,000 mg/m3) only five days after the event? Did regulators overact? To what extent did they manage the perceived risk rather than the actual one? At a time when the impact of the volcanic ash cloud crisis is being closely scrutinised by both public authorities and the affected industries, it seems particularly timely to establish what happened during the worst aviation crisis in European history. This report was written one week after the event and relied on a limited number of sources available by 30 April 2010.
author2 Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC (GREGH)
Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC Paris)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Alemanno, Alberto
author_facet Alemanno, Alberto
author_sort Alemanno, Alberto
title The European regulatory response to the volcanic ash crisis between fragmentation and integration
title_short The European regulatory response to the volcanic ash crisis between fragmentation and integration
title_full The European regulatory response to the volcanic ash crisis between fragmentation and integration
title_fullStr The European regulatory response to the volcanic ash crisis between fragmentation and integration
title_full_unstemmed The European regulatory response to the volcanic ash crisis between fragmentation and integration
title_sort european regulatory response to the volcanic ash crisis between fragmentation and integration
publisher HAL CCSD
publishDate 2010
url https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537063
genre Eyjafjallajökull
genre_facet Eyjafjallajökull
op_source ISSN: 1867-299X
EISSN: 2190-8249
European Journal of Risk Regulation
https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537063
European Journal of Risk Regulation, Cambridge University Press, 2010, 2, pp.NC
op_relation hal-00537063
https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537063
_version_ 1766405501904486400