Extreme differences in rates of molecular evolution of foraminifera revealed by comparison of ribosomal DNA sequences and the fossil record

• Published in: Molecular Biology and Evolution
• Main Authors: Pawlowski, J., Bolivar, I., Fahrni, J.F., de Vargas, C., Gouy, Manolo, Zaninetti, L.
• Other Authors: Bioinformatique, phylogénie et génomique évolutive (BPGE), Département PEGASE LBBE (PEGASE), Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive - UMR 5558 (LBBE), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive - UMR 5558 (LBBE), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: HAL CCSD 1997
• Subjects: [SDV.OT]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Other [q-bio.OT]; Planktonic foraminifera
• Online Access: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00434978; https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025786

Foraminifera have one of the best known fossil records among the unicellular eukaryotes. However, the origin and phylogenetic relationships of the extant foraminiferal lineages are poorly understood. To test the current paleontological hypotheses on evolution of foraminifera, we sequenced about 1,000 base pairs from the 3' end of the small subunit rRNA gene (SSU rDNA) in 22 species representing all major taxonomic groups. Phylogenies were derived using neighbor-joining, maximum-parsimony, and maximum-likelihood methods. All analyses confirm the monophyletic origin of foraminifera. Evolutionary relationships within foraminifera inferred from rDNA sequences, however, depend on the method of tree building and on the choice of analyzed sites. In particular, the position of planktonic foraminifera shows important variations. We have shown that these changes result from the extremely high rate of rDNA evolution in this group. By comparing the number of substitutions with the divergence times inferred from the fossil record, we have estimated that the rate of rDNA evolution in planktonic foraminifera is 50 to 100 times faster than in some benthic foraminifera. The use of the maximum-likelihood method and limitation of analyzed sites to the most conserved parts of the SSU rRNA molecule render molecular and paleontological data generally congruent.