Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Energy Expenditure of Incubating Wandering Albatrosses

International audience Measurements of incubation energetics can vary depending on the method used to measure metabolism of an incubating bird. Therefore, we evaluated the energy expenditure of six male and four female wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans Linnaeus) using doubly labeled water (DLW...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Weimerskirch, Henri
Other Authors: Centre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal.science/hal-00193231
id ftunivnantes:oai:HAL:hal-00193231v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivnantes:oai:HAL:hal-00193231v1 2023-05-15T16:00:56+02:00 Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Energy Expenditure of Incubating Wandering Albatrosses Weimerskirch, Henri Centre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 2001 https://hal.science/hal-00193231 en eng HAL CCSD University of Chicago Press hal-00193231 https://hal.science/hal-00193231 ISSN: 1522-2152 EISSN: 1537-5293 Physiological and Biochemical Zoology https://hal.science/hal-00193231 Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 2001, 74 (6), pp.823-831 [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology [SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society [SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2001 ftunivnantes 2023-02-08T08:12:43Z International audience Measurements of incubation energetics can vary depending on the method used to measure metabolism of an incubating bird. Therefore, we evaluated the energy expenditure of six male and four female wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans Linnaeus) using doubly labeled water (DLW), the rate of mass loss, and estimates of metabolic water production derived from water influx rate (WIR). Incubation metabolic rates (IMR) determined with DLW ( kJ kg1 d1 SD) were 16921 significantly lower than estimates derived from mass loss (27746 kJ kg1 d1 SD) and WIR (malesp28960 kJ kg1 d1 vs. femalesp40069 kJ kg1 d1 SD). Estimates of IMR from mass loss and WIR were similar to IMR (30539 kJ kg1 d1 SD) determined by respirometry in a previous study, and IMR from DLW was similar to estimates based on heart rate (HR; 14726 kJ kg1 d1 SD) determined in another study. Applying the different measurements of IMR to construct an energy budget, we estimate that a breeding pair of wandering albatrosses spends 124–234 MJ to incubate the egg for 78 d. Finally, IMRs determined with DLW and HR were similar to estimated basal metabolic rates derived from six different allometric equations, suggesting that heat production from adult maintenance metabolism is sufficient to incubate the egg. Article in Journal/Newspaper Diomedea exulans Université de Nantes: HAL-UNIV-NANTES
institution Open Polar
collection Université de Nantes: HAL-UNIV-NANTES
op_collection_id ftunivnantes
language English
topic [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology
[SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society
[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes
spellingShingle [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology
[SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society
[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes
Weimerskirch, Henri
Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Energy Expenditure of Incubating Wandering Albatrosses
topic_facet [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology
[SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society
[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes
description International audience Measurements of incubation energetics can vary depending on the method used to measure metabolism of an incubating bird. Therefore, we evaluated the energy expenditure of six male and four female wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans Linnaeus) using doubly labeled water (DLW), the rate of mass loss, and estimates of metabolic water production derived from water influx rate (WIR). Incubation metabolic rates (IMR) determined with DLW ( kJ kg1 d1 SD) were 16921 significantly lower than estimates derived from mass loss (27746 kJ kg1 d1 SD) and WIR (malesp28960 kJ kg1 d1 vs. femalesp40069 kJ kg1 d1 SD). Estimates of IMR from mass loss and WIR were similar to IMR (30539 kJ kg1 d1 SD) determined by respirometry in a previous study, and IMR from DLW was similar to estimates based on heart rate (HR; 14726 kJ kg1 d1 SD) determined in another study. Applying the different measurements of IMR to construct an energy budget, we estimate that a breeding pair of wandering albatrosses spends 124–234 MJ to incubate the egg for 78 d. Finally, IMRs determined with DLW and HR were similar to estimated basal metabolic rates derived from six different allometric equations, suggesting that heat production from adult maintenance metabolism is sufficient to incubate the egg.
author2 Centre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Weimerskirch, Henri
author_facet Weimerskirch, Henri
author_sort Weimerskirch, Henri
title Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Energy Expenditure of Incubating Wandering Albatrosses
title_short Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Energy Expenditure of Incubating Wandering Albatrosses
title_full Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Energy Expenditure of Incubating Wandering Albatrosses
title_fullStr Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Energy Expenditure of Incubating Wandering Albatrosses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Energy Expenditure of Incubating Wandering Albatrosses
title_sort comparison of methods for evaluating energy expenditure of incubating wandering albatrosses
publisher HAL CCSD
publishDate 2001
url https://hal.science/hal-00193231
genre Diomedea exulans
genre_facet Diomedea exulans
op_source ISSN: 1522-2152
EISSN: 1537-5293
Physiological and Biochemical Zoology
https://hal.science/hal-00193231
Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 2001, 74 (6), pp.823-831
op_relation hal-00193231
https://hal.science/hal-00193231
_version_ 1766396943268839424