Of wolves and bears: Seasonal drivers of interference and exploitation competition between apex predators

Competition between apex predators can alter the strength of top-down forcing, yet we know little about the behavioral mechanisms that drive competition in multipredator ecosystems. Interactions between predators can be synergistic (facilitative) or antagonistic (inhibitive), both of which are wides...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Monographs
Main Authors: Tallian, Aimee Grace, Ordiz, Andres, Metz, Matthew C., Zimmermann, Barbara, Wikenros, Camilla, Smith, Douglas W., Stahler, Daniel R., Wabakken, Petter, Swenson, Jon, Sand, Håkan, Kindberg, Jonas
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2984083
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1498
id ftunivmob:oai:nmbu.brage.unit.no:11250/2984083
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivmob:oai:nmbu.brage.unit.no:11250/2984083 2023-05-15T15:51:14+02:00 Of wolves and bears: Seasonal drivers of interference and exploitation competition between apex predators Tallian, Aimee Grace Ordiz, Andres Metz, Matthew C. Zimmermann, Barbara Wikenros, Camilla Smith, Douglas W. Stahler, Daniel R. Wabakken, Petter Swenson, Jon Sand, Håkan Kindberg, Jonas 2022-01-27T13:52:25Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2984083 https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1498 eng eng Ecological Monographs. 2021. urn:issn:0012-9615 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2984083 https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1498 cristin:1991396 Ecological Monographs Journal article Peer reviewed 2022 ftunivmob https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1498 2022-03-16T23:40:17Z Competition between apex predators can alter the strength of top-down forcing, yet we know little about the behavioral mechanisms that drive competition in multipredator ecosystems. Interactions between predators can be synergistic (facilitative) or antagonistic (inhibitive), both of which are widespread in nature, vary in strength between species and across space and time, and affect predation patterns and predator–prey dynamics. Recent research has suggested that gray wolf (Canis lupus) kill rates decrease where they are sympatric with brown bears (Ursus arctos), however, the mechanisms behind this pattern remain unknown. We used data from two long-term research projects in Scandinavia (Europe) and Yellowstone National Park (North America) to test the role of interference and exploitation competition from bears on wolf predatory behavior, where altered wolf handling and search time of prey in the presence of bears are indicative of interference and exploitation competition, respectively. Our results suggest the mechanisms driving competition between bears and wolves were dependent on the season and study system. During spring in Scandinavia, interference competition was the primary mechanism driving decreased kill rates for wolves sympatric with bears; handling time increased, but search time did not. In summer, however, when both bear and wolf predation focused on neonate moose, the behavioral mechanism switched to exploitation competition; search time increased, but handling time did not. Alternartively, interference competition did affect wolf predation dynamics in Yellowstone during summer, where wolves prey more evenly on neonate and adult ungulates. Here, bear presence at a carcass increased the amount of time wolves spent at carcasses of all sizes and wolf handling time for small prey, but decreased handling time for the largest prey. Wolves facilitate scavenging opportunities for bears, however, bears alter wolf predatory behavior via multiple pathways and are primarily antagonistic to wolves. Our study helps to clarify the behavioral mechanisms driving competition between apex predators, illustrating how interspecific interactions can manifest into population-level predation patterns. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus gray wolf Ursus arctos Open archive Norwegian University of Life Sciences: Brage NMBU Ecological Monographs
institution Open Polar
collection Open archive Norwegian University of Life Sciences: Brage NMBU
op_collection_id ftunivmob
language English
description Competition between apex predators can alter the strength of top-down forcing, yet we know little about the behavioral mechanisms that drive competition in multipredator ecosystems. Interactions between predators can be synergistic (facilitative) or antagonistic (inhibitive), both of which are widespread in nature, vary in strength between species and across space and time, and affect predation patterns and predator–prey dynamics. Recent research has suggested that gray wolf (Canis lupus) kill rates decrease where they are sympatric with brown bears (Ursus arctos), however, the mechanisms behind this pattern remain unknown. We used data from two long-term research projects in Scandinavia (Europe) and Yellowstone National Park (North America) to test the role of interference and exploitation competition from bears on wolf predatory behavior, where altered wolf handling and search time of prey in the presence of bears are indicative of interference and exploitation competition, respectively. Our results suggest the mechanisms driving competition between bears and wolves were dependent on the season and study system. During spring in Scandinavia, interference competition was the primary mechanism driving decreased kill rates for wolves sympatric with bears; handling time increased, but search time did not. In summer, however, when both bear and wolf predation focused on neonate moose, the behavioral mechanism switched to exploitation competition; search time increased, but handling time did not. Alternartively, interference competition did affect wolf predation dynamics in Yellowstone during summer, where wolves prey more evenly on neonate and adult ungulates. Here, bear presence at a carcass increased the amount of time wolves spent at carcasses of all sizes and wolf handling time for small prey, but decreased handling time for the largest prey. Wolves facilitate scavenging opportunities for bears, however, bears alter wolf predatory behavior via multiple pathways and are primarily antagonistic to wolves. Our study helps to clarify the behavioral mechanisms driving competition between apex predators, illustrating how interspecific interactions can manifest into population-level predation patterns. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Tallian, Aimee Grace
Ordiz, Andres
Metz, Matthew C.
Zimmermann, Barbara
Wikenros, Camilla
Smith, Douglas W.
Stahler, Daniel R.
Wabakken, Petter
Swenson, Jon
Sand, Håkan
Kindberg, Jonas
spellingShingle Tallian, Aimee Grace
Ordiz, Andres
Metz, Matthew C.
Zimmermann, Barbara
Wikenros, Camilla
Smith, Douglas W.
Stahler, Daniel R.
Wabakken, Petter
Swenson, Jon
Sand, Håkan
Kindberg, Jonas
Of wolves and bears: Seasonal drivers of interference and exploitation competition between apex predators
author_facet Tallian, Aimee Grace
Ordiz, Andres
Metz, Matthew C.
Zimmermann, Barbara
Wikenros, Camilla
Smith, Douglas W.
Stahler, Daniel R.
Wabakken, Petter
Swenson, Jon
Sand, Håkan
Kindberg, Jonas
author_sort Tallian, Aimee Grace
title Of wolves and bears: Seasonal drivers of interference and exploitation competition between apex predators
title_short Of wolves and bears: Seasonal drivers of interference and exploitation competition between apex predators
title_full Of wolves and bears: Seasonal drivers of interference and exploitation competition between apex predators
title_fullStr Of wolves and bears: Seasonal drivers of interference and exploitation competition between apex predators
title_full_unstemmed Of wolves and bears: Seasonal drivers of interference and exploitation competition between apex predators
title_sort of wolves and bears: seasonal drivers of interference and exploitation competition between apex predators
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2984083
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1498
genre Canis lupus
gray wolf
Ursus arctos
genre_facet Canis lupus
gray wolf
Ursus arctos
op_source Ecological Monographs
op_relation Ecological Monographs. 2021.
urn:issn:0012-9615
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2984083
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1498
cristin:1991396
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1498
container_title Ecological Monographs
_version_ 1766386358221275136