The Politics Behind Science: Protection and Conservation of Marine Living Resources in Antarctica, 2005–2018
This article examines the interactions among members of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources during the debate on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Antarctica between 2005 and 2018. For this purpose, data were collected from final reports of the Commission’s annual...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10654/43550 https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/4268 https://doi.org/10.18359/ries.4268 |
id |
ftunivmilnueva:oai:repository.unimilitar.edu.co:10654/43550 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivmilnueva:oai:repository.unimilitar.edu.co:10654/43550 2023-05-15T14:12:06+02:00 The Politics Behind Science: Protection and Conservation of Marine Living Resources in Antarctica, 2005–2018 La política detrás de la ciencia: protección y conservación de recursos vivos marinos en la Antártida, 2005-2018 A política por trás da ciência: proteção e conservação de recursos vivos marinhos na Antártida, 2005-2018 Lorenzo, Cristian 2023-03-22T19:12:48Z application/pdf text/xml http://hdl.handle.net/10654/43550 https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/4268 https://doi.org/10.18359/ries.4268 spa spa Universidad Militar Nueva Granada https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/4268/4018 https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/4268/4268 https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/4268 doi:10.18359/ries.4268 http://hdl.handle.net/10654/43550 Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 117-127 Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2020): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 117-127 Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; v. 15 n. 1 (2020): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 117-127 1909-7743 1909-3063 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2023 ftunivmilnueva https://doi.org/10.18359/ries.4268 2023-03-26T18:15:46Z This article examines the interactions among members of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources during the debate on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Antarctica between 2005 and 2018. For this purpose, data were collected from final reports of the Commission’s annual meetings, institutional news of this Antarctic forum, and information published by the National Antarctic Programs of member countries. Using an inductive analysis strategy, this article affirms that these interactions are based on: 1) a series of bilateral and multilateral agreements on Antarctica, which frame the actions of states participating in this forum; 2) dilemmas among members of the Commission about the conservation of marine biodiversity; and 3) state and non-state interests in the management of Antarctic marine living resources that could potentially converge. These three characteristics allow us to understand that the dispute over the management of Antarctic areas is a subtle way of doing geopolitics by defining environmental criteria to designate MPAs or establish management and evaluation mechanisms. This article aims at providing an input into the discussion of science and politics in the Antarctic Treaty System. Este artículo examina las interacciones entre miembros de la Comisión para la Conservaciónde Recursos Vivos Marinos Antárticos durante el debate sobre Áreas Marinas Protegidas (amp) en laAntártida, desde el 2005 hasta el 2018. Para su abordaje, se recolectaron datos provenientes deinformes finales de las reuniones anuales de la Comisión, novedades institucionales de este foro antártico e información publicada por los Programas Nacionales Antárticos de países que lo integran.A partir de una estrategia inductiva de análisis, este artículo afirma que dichas interacciones estánbasadas en: 1) una serie de acuerdos bilaterales y multilaterales sobre la Antártida, que enmarcan lasacciones de los Estados que participan de este foro; 2) dilemas entre los miembros de la Comisiónacerca de la ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antártida Universidad Militar Nueva Granada: Repositorio Institucional UMNG Antarctic The Antarctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada: Repositorio Institucional UMNG |
op_collection_id |
ftunivmilnueva |
language |
Spanish |
description |
This article examines the interactions among members of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources during the debate on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Antarctica between 2005 and 2018. For this purpose, data were collected from final reports of the Commission’s annual meetings, institutional news of this Antarctic forum, and information published by the National Antarctic Programs of member countries. Using an inductive analysis strategy, this article affirms that these interactions are based on: 1) a series of bilateral and multilateral agreements on Antarctica, which frame the actions of states participating in this forum; 2) dilemmas among members of the Commission about the conservation of marine biodiversity; and 3) state and non-state interests in the management of Antarctic marine living resources that could potentially converge. These three characteristics allow us to understand that the dispute over the management of Antarctic areas is a subtle way of doing geopolitics by defining environmental criteria to designate MPAs or establish management and evaluation mechanisms. This article aims at providing an input into the discussion of science and politics in the Antarctic Treaty System. Este artículo examina las interacciones entre miembros de la Comisión para la Conservaciónde Recursos Vivos Marinos Antárticos durante el debate sobre Áreas Marinas Protegidas (amp) en laAntártida, desde el 2005 hasta el 2018. Para su abordaje, se recolectaron datos provenientes deinformes finales de las reuniones anuales de la Comisión, novedades institucionales de este foro antártico e información publicada por los Programas Nacionales Antárticos de países que lo integran.A partir de una estrategia inductiva de análisis, este artículo afirma que dichas interacciones estánbasadas en: 1) una serie de acuerdos bilaterales y multilaterales sobre la Antártida, que enmarcan lasacciones de los Estados que participan de este foro; 2) dilemas entre los miembros de la Comisiónacerca de la ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Lorenzo, Cristian |
spellingShingle |
Lorenzo, Cristian The Politics Behind Science: Protection and Conservation of Marine Living Resources in Antarctica, 2005–2018 |
author_facet |
Lorenzo, Cristian |
author_sort |
Lorenzo, Cristian |
title |
The Politics Behind Science: Protection and Conservation of Marine Living Resources in Antarctica, 2005–2018 |
title_short |
The Politics Behind Science: Protection and Conservation of Marine Living Resources in Antarctica, 2005–2018 |
title_full |
The Politics Behind Science: Protection and Conservation of Marine Living Resources in Antarctica, 2005–2018 |
title_fullStr |
The Politics Behind Science: Protection and Conservation of Marine Living Resources in Antarctica, 2005–2018 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Politics Behind Science: Protection and Conservation of Marine Living Resources in Antarctica, 2005–2018 |
title_sort |
politics behind science: protection and conservation of marine living resources in antarctica, 2005–2018 |
publisher |
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10654/43550 https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/4268 https://doi.org/10.18359/ries.4268 |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antártida |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antártida |
op_source |
Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 117-127 Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2020): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 117-127 Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; v. 15 n. 1 (2020): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 117-127 1909-7743 1909-3063 |
op_relation |
https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/4268/4018 https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/4268/4268 https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/4268 doi:10.18359/ries.4268 http://hdl.handle.net/10654/43550 |
op_rights |
Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18359/ries.4268 |
_version_ |
1766284369263067136 |