Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review

This work is aimed at reviewing the current state of the art in geosite selection, assessment, and communication. We first highlight the main papers that have defined paramount concepts such as geodiversity, geoheritage, and geosites. We then delve into the theoretical principles and guidelines that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resources
Main Authors: Pasquaré Mariotto, F, Drymoni, K, Bonali, FL, Tibaldi, A, Corti, N, Oppizzi, P
Other Authors: Bonali, F
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10281/410256
https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029
_version_ 1832474205701013504
author Pasquaré Mariotto, F
Drymoni, K
Bonali, FL
Tibaldi, A
Corti, N
Oppizzi, P
author2 Pasquaré Mariotto, F
Drymoni, K
Bonali, F
Tibaldi, A
Corti, N
Oppizzi, P
author_facet Pasquaré Mariotto, F
Drymoni, K
Bonali, FL
Tibaldi, A
Corti, N
Oppizzi, P
author_sort Pasquaré Mariotto, F
collection Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca: BOA (Bicocca Open Archive)
container_issue 2
container_start_page 29
container_title Resources
container_volume 12
description This work is aimed at reviewing the current state of the art in geosite selection, assessment, and communication. We first highlight the main papers that have defined paramount concepts such as geodiversity, geoheritage, and geosites. We then delve into the theoretical principles and guidelines that have been proposed over the last twenty years by researchers who have thoroughly illustrated how to individuate and assess geosites. In doing so, we illustrate notable field examples of applications of qualitative and quantitative assessments of geosites in places such as Serbia, India, Iceland, Ecuador, Sardinia (Italy), Egypt, Tasmania (Australia), and Brazil. The third part of this work is dedicated to illustrating a list (by no means exhaustive) of works that have tried to come up with innovative tools, strategies, and solutions to promote and communicate geosites. From our work, it appears that geosites can be extremely effective as fully fledged outreach tools capable of bridging the gap between Earth science and the lay public.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
id ftunivmilanobic:oai:boa.unimib.it:10281/410256
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivmilanobic
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000941797700001
volume:12
issue:2
journal:RESOURCES
https://hdl.handle.net/10281/410256
doi:10.3390/resources12020029
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivmilanobic:oai:boa.unimib.it:10281/410256 2025-05-18T14:03:34+00:00 Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review Pasquaré Mariotto, F Drymoni, K Bonali, FL Tibaldi, A Corti, N Oppizzi, P Pasquaré Mariotto, F Drymoni, K Bonali, F Tibaldi, A Corti, N Oppizzi, P 2023 ELETTRONICO https://hdl.handle.net/10281/410256 https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029 eng eng MDPI country:CH info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000941797700001 volume:12 issue:2 journal:RESOURCES https://hdl.handle.net/10281/410256 doi:10.3390/resources12020029 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess educational geoheritage geosite scientific value info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2023 ftunivmilanobic https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029 2025-04-28T01:57:14Z This work is aimed at reviewing the current state of the art in geosite selection, assessment, and communication. We first highlight the main papers that have defined paramount concepts such as geodiversity, geoheritage, and geosites. We then delve into the theoretical principles and guidelines that have been proposed over the last twenty years by researchers who have thoroughly illustrated how to individuate and assess geosites. In doing so, we illustrate notable field examples of applications of qualitative and quantitative assessments of geosites in places such as Serbia, India, Iceland, Ecuador, Sardinia (Italy), Egypt, Tasmania (Australia), and Brazil. The third part of this work is dedicated to illustrating a list (by no means exhaustive) of works that have tried to come up with innovative tools, strategies, and solutions to promote and communicate geosites. From our work, it appears that geosites can be extremely effective as fully fledged outreach tools capable of bridging the gap between Earth science and the lay public. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca: BOA (Bicocca Open Archive) Resources 12 2 29
spellingShingle educational
geoheritage
geosite
scientific
value
Pasquaré Mariotto, F
Drymoni, K
Bonali, FL
Tibaldi, A
Corti, N
Oppizzi, P
Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review
title Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review
title_full Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review
title_fullStr Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review
title_short Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review
title_sort geosite assessment and communication: a review
topic educational
geoheritage
geosite
scientific
value
topic_facet educational
geoheritage
geosite
scientific
value
url https://hdl.handle.net/10281/410256
https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029