Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review
This work is aimed at reviewing the current state of the art in geosite selection, assessment, and communication. We first highlight the main papers that have defined paramount concepts such as geodiversity, geoheritage, and geosites. We then delve into the theoretical principles and guidelines that...
Published in: | Resources |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10281/410256 https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029 |
_version_ | 1832474205701013504 |
---|---|
author | Pasquaré Mariotto, F Drymoni, K Bonali, FL Tibaldi, A Corti, N Oppizzi, P |
author2 | Pasquaré Mariotto, F Drymoni, K Bonali, F Tibaldi, A Corti, N Oppizzi, P |
author_facet | Pasquaré Mariotto, F Drymoni, K Bonali, FL Tibaldi, A Corti, N Oppizzi, P |
author_sort | Pasquaré Mariotto, F |
collection | Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca: BOA (Bicocca Open Archive) |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | Resources |
container_volume | 12 |
description | This work is aimed at reviewing the current state of the art in geosite selection, assessment, and communication. We first highlight the main papers that have defined paramount concepts such as geodiversity, geoheritage, and geosites. We then delve into the theoretical principles and guidelines that have been proposed over the last twenty years by researchers who have thoroughly illustrated how to individuate and assess geosites. In doing so, we illustrate notable field examples of applications of qualitative and quantitative assessments of geosites in places such as Serbia, India, Iceland, Ecuador, Sardinia (Italy), Egypt, Tasmania (Australia), and Brazil. The third part of this work is dedicated to illustrating a list (by no means exhaustive) of works that have tried to come up with innovative tools, strategies, and solutions to promote and communicate geosites. From our work, it appears that geosites can be extremely effective as fully fledged outreach tools capable of bridging the gap between Earth science and the lay public. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Iceland |
genre_facet | Iceland |
id | ftunivmilanobic:oai:boa.unimib.it:10281/410256 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftunivmilanobic |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029 |
op_relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000941797700001 volume:12 issue:2 journal:RESOURCES https://hdl.handle.net/10281/410256 doi:10.3390/resources12020029 |
op_rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivmilanobic:oai:boa.unimib.it:10281/410256 2025-05-18T14:03:34+00:00 Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review Pasquaré Mariotto, F Drymoni, K Bonali, FL Tibaldi, A Corti, N Oppizzi, P Pasquaré Mariotto, F Drymoni, K Bonali, F Tibaldi, A Corti, N Oppizzi, P 2023 ELETTRONICO https://hdl.handle.net/10281/410256 https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029 eng eng MDPI country:CH info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000941797700001 volume:12 issue:2 journal:RESOURCES https://hdl.handle.net/10281/410256 doi:10.3390/resources12020029 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess educational geoheritage geosite scientific value info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2023 ftunivmilanobic https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029 2025-04-28T01:57:14Z This work is aimed at reviewing the current state of the art in geosite selection, assessment, and communication. We first highlight the main papers that have defined paramount concepts such as geodiversity, geoheritage, and geosites. We then delve into the theoretical principles and guidelines that have been proposed over the last twenty years by researchers who have thoroughly illustrated how to individuate and assess geosites. In doing so, we illustrate notable field examples of applications of qualitative and quantitative assessments of geosites in places such as Serbia, India, Iceland, Ecuador, Sardinia (Italy), Egypt, Tasmania (Australia), and Brazil. The third part of this work is dedicated to illustrating a list (by no means exhaustive) of works that have tried to come up with innovative tools, strategies, and solutions to promote and communicate geosites. From our work, it appears that geosites can be extremely effective as fully fledged outreach tools capable of bridging the gap between Earth science and the lay public. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca: BOA (Bicocca Open Archive) Resources 12 2 29 |
spellingShingle | educational geoheritage geosite scientific value Pasquaré Mariotto, F Drymoni, K Bonali, FL Tibaldi, A Corti, N Oppizzi, P Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review |
title | Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review |
title_full | Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review |
title_fullStr | Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review |
title_short | Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review |
title_sort | geosite assessment and communication: a review |
topic | educational geoheritage geosite scientific value |
topic_facet | educational geoheritage geosite scientific value |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10281/410256 https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029 |