Ecological features of feather microbiota in breeding common swifts

We provide the first-ever investigation of feather microbiota by high throughput DNA sequencing for any bird species by describing bacteria found on the innermost tertial feather of 22 adult common swifts (Apus apus). We found feather microbiomes with large abundance of Bacillales, Actinomycetales,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ethology Ecology & Evolution
Main Authors: Musitelli F., Ambrosini R., Caffi M., Caprioli M., Rubolini D., Saino N., Franzetti A., Gandolfi I.
Other Authors: Musitelli, F, Ambrosini, R, Caffi, M, Caprioli, M, Rubolini, D, Saino, N, Franzetti, A, Gandolfi, I
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10281/253943
https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2018.1459865
id ftunivmilanobic:oai:boa.unimib.it:10281/253943
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivmilanobic:oai:boa.unimib.it:10281/253943 2024-04-21T07:53:09+00:00 Ecological features of feather microbiota in breeding common swifts Musitelli F. Ambrosini R. Caffi M. Caprioli M. Rubolini D. Saino N. Franzetti A. Gandolfi I. Musitelli, F Ambrosini, R Caffi, M Caprioli, M Rubolini, D Saino, N Franzetti, A Gandolfi, I 2018 http://hdl.handle.net/10281/253943 https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2018.1459865 eng eng Taylor and Francis Ltd. info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000446964500006 volume:30 issue:6 firstpage:569 lastpage:581 numberofpages:13 journal:ETHOLOGY ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION http://hdl.handle.net/10281/253943 doi:10.1080/03949370.2018.1459865 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85047911842 Apus apu high-throughput sequencing migratory bird plumage bacteria info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2018 ftunivmilanobic https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2018.1459865 2024-03-28T01:16:08Z We provide the first-ever investigation of feather microbiota by high throughput DNA sequencing for any bird species by describing bacteria found on the innermost tertial feather of 22 adult common swifts (Apus apus). We found feather microbiomes with large abundance of Bacillales, Actinomycetales, Burkholderiales, Sphingobacteriales, Sphingomonadales, Rhizobiales, Pseudomonadales, Clostridiales, Rubrobacterales and Lactobacillales. Bacterial communities did not change with any feature of individual swifts. Network and cluster analysis of feather microbiomes disclosed three clusters, characterized by bacteria typical of seawater, plants and soil and unrelated to conditions at the breeding grounds. We hypothesize that feather microbiomes reflect, at least partly, airborne bacterial communities of the environments where individuals spent non-breeding periods, or of those that they crossed during migration, rather than breeding environment. If confirmed, this evidence may disclose the possibility to use feather bacteria as proxies for tracing non-breeding origin and routes of migratory birds. Article in Journal/Newspaper Apus apus Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca: BOA (Bicocca Open Archive) Ethology Ecology & Evolution 30 6 569 581
institution Open Polar
collection Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca: BOA (Bicocca Open Archive)
op_collection_id ftunivmilanobic
language English
topic Apus apu
high-throughput sequencing
migratory bird
plumage bacteria
spellingShingle Apus apu
high-throughput sequencing
migratory bird
plumage bacteria
Musitelli F.
Ambrosini R.
Caffi M.
Caprioli M.
Rubolini D.
Saino N.
Franzetti A.
Gandolfi I.
Ecological features of feather microbiota in breeding common swifts
topic_facet Apus apu
high-throughput sequencing
migratory bird
plumage bacteria
description We provide the first-ever investigation of feather microbiota by high throughput DNA sequencing for any bird species by describing bacteria found on the innermost tertial feather of 22 adult common swifts (Apus apus). We found feather microbiomes with large abundance of Bacillales, Actinomycetales, Burkholderiales, Sphingobacteriales, Sphingomonadales, Rhizobiales, Pseudomonadales, Clostridiales, Rubrobacterales and Lactobacillales. Bacterial communities did not change with any feature of individual swifts. Network and cluster analysis of feather microbiomes disclosed three clusters, characterized by bacteria typical of seawater, plants and soil and unrelated to conditions at the breeding grounds. We hypothesize that feather microbiomes reflect, at least partly, airborne bacterial communities of the environments where individuals spent non-breeding periods, or of those that they crossed during migration, rather than breeding environment. If confirmed, this evidence may disclose the possibility to use feather bacteria as proxies for tracing non-breeding origin and routes of migratory birds.
author2 Musitelli, F
Ambrosini, R
Caffi, M
Caprioli, M
Rubolini, D
Saino, N
Franzetti, A
Gandolfi, I
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Musitelli F.
Ambrosini R.
Caffi M.
Caprioli M.
Rubolini D.
Saino N.
Franzetti A.
Gandolfi I.
author_facet Musitelli F.
Ambrosini R.
Caffi M.
Caprioli M.
Rubolini D.
Saino N.
Franzetti A.
Gandolfi I.
author_sort Musitelli F.
title Ecological features of feather microbiota in breeding common swifts
title_short Ecological features of feather microbiota in breeding common swifts
title_full Ecological features of feather microbiota in breeding common swifts
title_fullStr Ecological features of feather microbiota in breeding common swifts
title_full_unstemmed Ecological features of feather microbiota in breeding common swifts
title_sort ecological features of feather microbiota in breeding common swifts
publisher Taylor and Francis Ltd.
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10281/253943
https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2018.1459865
genre Apus apus
genre_facet Apus apus
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000446964500006
volume:30
issue:6
firstpage:569
lastpage:581
numberofpages:13
journal:ETHOLOGY ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
http://hdl.handle.net/10281/253943
doi:10.1080/03949370.2018.1459865
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85047911842
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2018.1459865
container_title Ethology Ecology & Evolution
container_volume 30
container_issue 6
container_start_page 569
op_container_end_page 581
_version_ 1796936377646972928