Which is the best method to prepare invertebrate shells for SEM analysis? : Testing different techniques on recent and fossil brachiopods

The analysis of invertebrate shell microstructures by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) is a method easily available to most palaeontologists and geochemists; sample preparation does not require specialised techniques or instruments but it requires attention to detail in order to capture microstruc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Crippa, F. Ye, C. Malinverno, A. Rizzi
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Società Paleontologica Italiana 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2434/449086
https://doi.org/10.4435/BSPI.2016.11
id ftunivmilanoair:oai:air.unimi.it:2434/449086
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivmilanoair:oai:air.unimi.it:2434/449086 2024-02-11T09:58:29+01:00 Which is the best method to prepare invertebrate shells for SEM analysis? : Testing different techniques on recent and fossil brachiopods G. Crippa F. Ye C. Malinverno A. Rizzi G. Crippa F. Ye C. Malinverno A. Rizzi 2016 http://hdl.handle.net/2434/449086 https://doi.org/10.4435/BSPI.2016.11 eng eng Società Paleontologica Italiana info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000388063000004 volume:55 issue:2 firstpage:111 lastpage:125 numberofpages:15 journal:BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ PALEONTOLOGICA ITALIANA http://hdl.handle.net/2434/449086 doi:10.4435/BSPI.2016.11 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-84989299855 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess microstructure sample preparation organic matrix fibrous layer biocomposites Settore GEO/01 - Paleontologia e Paleoecologia info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2016 ftunivmilanoair https://doi.org/10.4435/BSPI.2016.11 2024-01-23T23:31:54Z The analysis of invertebrate shell microstructures by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) is a method easily available to most palaeontologists and geochemists; sample preparation does not require specialised techniques or instruments but it requires attention to detail in order to capture microstructural information invaluable to researchers in different fields of palaeontology. Herein, several tests were performed on recent and fossil brachiopod shells, excellent archives of ecological/palaeoecological and climatological/palaeoclimatological information, experimenting new and old methodologies in order to identify a general protocol to better highlight and analyse the shell biocomposite. The results of these tests are documented by SEM images. For recent brachiopod shells, we analysed seven specimens belonging to the species Liothyrella uva and Liothyrella neozelanica, respectively collected from Antarctica and New Zealand. We carried out several tests to check the response of the shell fabric to the resin used to embed the valves before cutting (Procedures 1b and 2c) and to different times of exposure to hydrochloric acid (Procedure 10; as the presence of the organic matrix in recent shells represents the main obstacle to obtaining high quality images at the SEM, to remove it we used bleach (Procedure 2a) and hydrogen peroxide (Procedure 2b) with different concentrations and times of exposure. We then analysed two fossil specimens of Terebratula scillae collected from a lower Pleistocene succession in Northern Italy; here, we mainly checked the degree of penetration of the resin into the shell substance, embedding (Procedure 3a) vs not embedding (Procedure 3b) the specimens before cutting them. We show that Procedures 2a and 2b (embedding in the resin, bleach and hydrogen peroxide at the highest time of exposure, hydrochloric acid for 3 seconds) are the best methods to use when preparing recent brachiopods, whereas fossil shells should be subject to Procedure 3b (embedding in the resin, hydrochloric acid for ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica The University of Milan: Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (AIR) New Zealand
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Milan: Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (AIR)
op_collection_id ftunivmilanoair
language English
topic microstructure
sample preparation
organic matrix
fibrous layer
biocomposites
Settore GEO/01 - Paleontologia e Paleoecologia
spellingShingle microstructure
sample preparation
organic matrix
fibrous layer
biocomposites
Settore GEO/01 - Paleontologia e Paleoecologia
G. Crippa
F. Ye
C. Malinverno
A. Rizzi
Which is the best method to prepare invertebrate shells for SEM analysis? : Testing different techniques on recent and fossil brachiopods
topic_facet microstructure
sample preparation
organic matrix
fibrous layer
biocomposites
Settore GEO/01 - Paleontologia e Paleoecologia
description The analysis of invertebrate shell microstructures by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) is a method easily available to most palaeontologists and geochemists; sample preparation does not require specialised techniques or instruments but it requires attention to detail in order to capture microstructural information invaluable to researchers in different fields of palaeontology. Herein, several tests were performed on recent and fossil brachiopod shells, excellent archives of ecological/palaeoecological and climatological/palaeoclimatological information, experimenting new and old methodologies in order to identify a general protocol to better highlight and analyse the shell biocomposite. The results of these tests are documented by SEM images. For recent brachiopod shells, we analysed seven specimens belonging to the species Liothyrella uva and Liothyrella neozelanica, respectively collected from Antarctica and New Zealand. We carried out several tests to check the response of the shell fabric to the resin used to embed the valves before cutting (Procedures 1b and 2c) and to different times of exposure to hydrochloric acid (Procedure 10; as the presence of the organic matrix in recent shells represents the main obstacle to obtaining high quality images at the SEM, to remove it we used bleach (Procedure 2a) and hydrogen peroxide (Procedure 2b) with different concentrations and times of exposure. We then analysed two fossil specimens of Terebratula scillae collected from a lower Pleistocene succession in Northern Italy; here, we mainly checked the degree of penetration of the resin into the shell substance, embedding (Procedure 3a) vs not embedding (Procedure 3b) the specimens before cutting them. We show that Procedures 2a and 2b (embedding in the resin, bleach and hydrogen peroxide at the highest time of exposure, hydrochloric acid for 3 seconds) are the best methods to use when preparing recent brachiopods, whereas fossil shells should be subject to Procedure 3b (embedding in the resin, hydrochloric acid for ...
author2 G. Crippa
F. Ye
C. Malinverno
A. Rizzi
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author G. Crippa
F. Ye
C. Malinverno
A. Rizzi
author_facet G. Crippa
F. Ye
C. Malinverno
A. Rizzi
author_sort G. Crippa
title Which is the best method to prepare invertebrate shells for SEM analysis? : Testing different techniques on recent and fossil brachiopods
title_short Which is the best method to prepare invertebrate shells for SEM analysis? : Testing different techniques on recent and fossil brachiopods
title_full Which is the best method to prepare invertebrate shells for SEM analysis? : Testing different techniques on recent and fossil brachiopods
title_fullStr Which is the best method to prepare invertebrate shells for SEM analysis? : Testing different techniques on recent and fossil brachiopods
title_full_unstemmed Which is the best method to prepare invertebrate shells for SEM analysis? : Testing different techniques on recent and fossil brachiopods
title_sort which is the best method to prepare invertebrate shells for sem analysis? : testing different techniques on recent and fossil brachiopods
publisher Società Paleontologica Italiana
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/2434/449086
https://doi.org/10.4435/BSPI.2016.11
geographic New Zealand
geographic_facet New Zealand
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000388063000004
volume:55
issue:2
firstpage:111
lastpage:125
numberofpages:15
journal:BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ PALEONTOLOGICA ITALIANA
http://hdl.handle.net/2434/449086
doi:10.4435/BSPI.2016.11
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-84989299855
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.4435/BSPI.2016.11
_version_ 1790594134858268672