Exploration of methods used to describe bacterial communities in silage of maize (Zea mays) cultivars

Different techniques to assess bacterial community structure and diversity were evaluated in silages prepared with four different maize cultivars, three conventional and one transgenic (cv. Tundra, event Bt-176). Plants were cultivated in the greenhouse and harvested after 30 days of growth. Silage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Brusetti, S. Borin, A. Rizzi, D. Mora, C. Sorlini, D.G. Daffonchio
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: EDP sciences 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2434/141461
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007047
id ftunivmilanoair:oai:air.unimi.it:2434/141461
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivmilanoair:oai:air.unimi.it:2434/141461 2024-02-11T10:09:14+01:00 Exploration of methods used to describe bacterial communities in silage of maize (Zea mays) cultivars L. Brusetti S. Borin A. Rizzi D. Mora C. Sorlini D.G. Daffonchio L. Brusetti S. Borin A. Rizzi D. Mora C. Sorlini D.G. Daffonchio 2008 http://hdl.handle.net/2434/141461 https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007047 eng eng EDP sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/18384727 volume:7 issue:1 firstpage:25 lastpage:33 journal:ENVIRONMENTAL BIOSAFETY RESEARCH http://hdl.handle.net/2434/141461 doi:10.1051/ebr:2007047 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-41849108080 Bacterial communitie Maize Method Silage fermentation Transgenic plants Settore AGR/16 - Microbiologia Agraria info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2008 ftunivmilanoair https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007047 2024-01-23T23:20:12Z Different techniques to assess bacterial community structure and diversity were evaluated in silages prepared with four different maize cultivars, three conventional and one transgenic (cv. Tundra, event Bt-176). Plants were cultivated in the greenhouse and harvested after 30 days of growth. Silage samples were collected at successive times during fermentation and analyzed for bacterial counts and by various DNA-based fingerprinting techniques. Bacterial counts were similar between cultivars for the total culturable bacteria, sporeforming, and mesophilic and thermophilic lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Further analysis of the species composition of 388 LAB strains by intergenic transcribed spacer (ITS) PCR followed by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene did not reveal differences between cultivars. In contrast, molecular fingerprinting methods targeting whole bacterial communities, such as automated ribosomal intergenic spacers analysis (ARISA) and 16S rRNA gene length heterogeneity-PCR (LH-PCR), indicated that different maize silage batches or cultivars hosted different bacterial communities. Thus, ARISA and LH-PCR fingerprinting techniques offer a fast and sensitive method to compare bacterial communities, and to detect differences in silage bacterial communities. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tundra The University of Milan: Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (AIR)
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Milan: Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (AIR)
op_collection_id ftunivmilanoair
language English
topic Bacterial communitie
Maize
Method
Silage fermentation
Transgenic plants
Settore AGR/16 - Microbiologia Agraria
spellingShingle Bacterial communitie
Maize
Method
Silage fermentation
Transgenic plants
Settore AGR/16 - Microbiologia Agraria
L. Brusetti
S. Borin
A. Rizzi
D. Mora
C. Sorlini
D.G. Daffonchio
Exploration of methods used to describe bacterial communities in silage of maize (Zea mays) cultivars
topic_facet Bacterial communitie
Maize
Method
Silage fermentation
Transgenic plants
Settore AGR/16 - Microbiologia Agraria
description Different techniques to assess bacterial community structure and diversity were evaluated in silages prepared with four different maize cultivars, three conventional and one transgenic (cv. Tundra, event Bt-176). Plants were cultivated in the greenhouse and harvested after 30 days of growth. Silage samples were collected at successive times during fermentation and analyzed for bacterial counts and by various DNA-based fingerprinting techniques. Bacterial counts were similar between cultivars for the total culturable bacteria, sporeforming, and mesophilic and thermophilic lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Further analysis of the species composition of 388 LAB strains by intergenic transcribed spacer (ITS) PCR followed by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene did not reveal differences between cultivars. In contrast, molecular fingerprinting methods targeting whole bacterial communities, such as automated ribosomal intergenic spacers analysis (ARISA) and 16S rRNA gene length heterogeneity-PCR (LH-PCR), indicated that different maize silage batches or cultivars hosted different bacterial communities. Thus, ARISA and LH-PCR fingerprinting techniques offer a fast and sensitive method to compare bacterial communities, and to detect differences in silage bacterial communities.
author2 L. Brusetti
S. Borin
A. Rizzi
D. Mora
C. Sorlini
D.G. Daffonchio
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author L. Brusetti
S. Borin
A. Rizzi
D. Mora
C. Sorlini
D.G. Daffonchio
author_facet L. Brusetti
S. Borin
A. Rizzi
D. Mora
C. Sorlini
D.G. Daffonchio
author_sort L. Brusetti
title Exploration of methods used to describe bacterial communities in silage of maize (Zea mays) cultivars
title_short Exploration of methods used to describe bacterial communities in silage of maize (Zea mays) cultivars
title_full Exploration of methods used to describe bacterial communities in silage of maize (Zea mays) cultivars
title_fullStr Exploration of methods used to describe bacterial communities in silage of maize (Zea mays) cultivars
title_full_unstemmed Exploration of methods used to describe bacterial communities in silage of maize (Zea mays) cultivars
title_sort exploration of methods used to describe bacterial communities in silage of maize (zea mays) cultivars
publisher EDP sciences
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/2434/141461
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007047
genre Tundra
genre_facet Tundra
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/18384727
volume:7
issue:1
firstpage:25
lastpage:33
journal:ENVIRONMENTAL BIOSAFETY RESEARCH
http://hdl.handle.net/2434/141461
doi:10.1051/ebr:2007047
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-41849108080
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007047
_version_ 1790609026421096448