The formal expression of markedness

This dissertation presents a formal theory of markedness, set within Optimality Theory. Two of the leading ideas are (a) hierarchical markedness relations may be ignored, but never reversed and (b) the more marked an element is, the greater the pressure to preserve it. An example of (a) is found in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: de Lacy, Paul Valiant
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI3068550
id ftunivmassamh:oai:scholarworks.umass.edu:dissertations-6420
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivmassamh:oai:scholarworks.umass.edu:dissertations-6420 2023-05-15T17:23:39+02:00 The formal expression of markedness de Lacy, Paul Valiant 2002-01-01T08:00:00Z https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI3068550 ENG eng ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI3068550 Doctoral Dissertations Available from Proquest Linguistics|Philosophy text 2002 ftunivmassamh 2022-02-03T18:36:55Z This dissertation presents a formal theory of markedness, set within Optimality Theory. Two of the leading ideas are (a) hierarchical markedness relations may be ignored, but never reversed and (b) the more marked an element is, the greater the pressure to preserve it. An example of (a) is found in sonority-driven stress systems. In Gujarati, low vowels attract stress away from mid vowels, while Nganasan's stress system makes no distinction between the two categories. So, while stressed mid vowels are more marked than stressed low vowels (as shown by Gujarati), that distinction can be conflated (as in Nganasan). However, in no language is the markedness relation reversed: stressed mid vowels are never preferred over stressed low vowels. An example of (b) is found in Yamphu. /t/ is eliminated through a process of debuccalization. In contrast, the more marked segments /k/ and /p/ remain intact; these segments avoid the debuccalization process because they are highly marked and thereby excite greater preservation. Ideas (a) and (b) are formally expressed as a set of constraint-formation conditions. For constraints on output structures (‘markedness’ constraints), if a constraint assigns a violation to an element p in scale S, then the constraint also assigns a violation to every element that is more marked than p in S. An analogous proposal applies to faithfulness (i.e. preservation) constraints: if a faithfulness constraint bans an unfaithful mapping from element p in scale S, then the constraint also bans unfaithful mappings from all elements that are more marked than p in S. The result is that—regardless of the constraints' ranking—more marked elements are both subject to more stringent output conditions and preserved more faithfully than lesser-marked ones. The constraints are also shown to allow distinctions between scale categories to be collapsed. A wide range of phonological phenomena provide evidence for the theoretical proposals, including analyses and typologies of sonority-driven stress (Nganasan, Gujarati, Kiriwina, and Harar Oromo), tone-driven stress, vowel and consonant epenthesis, vowel reduction (Dutch), coda neutralization (Malay and Yamphu), Place assimilation (Catalan, Ponapean, Korean, Swedish, and Sri Lankan Portuguese Creole), and coalescence (Attic Greek and Pāli). Text Nganasan* University of Massachusetts: ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst
institution Open Polar
collection University of Massachusetts: ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst
op_collection_id ftunivmassamh
language English
topic Linguistics|Philosophy
spellingShingle Linguistics|Philosophy
de Lacy, Paul Valiant
The formal expression of markedness
topic_facet Linguistics|Philosophy
description This dissertation presents a formal theory of markedness, set within Optimality Theory. Two of the leading ideas are (a) hierarchical markedness relations may be ignored, but never reversed and (b) the more marked an element is, the greater the pressure to preserve it. An example of (a) is found in sonority-driven stress systems. In Gujarati, low vowels attract stress away from mid vowels, while Nganasan's stress system makes no distinction between the two categories. So, while stressed mid vowels are more marked than stressed low vowels (as shown by Gujarati), that distinction can be conflated (as in Nganasan). However, in no language is the markedness relation reversed: stressed mid vowels are never preferred over stressed low vowels. An example of (b) is found in Yamphu. /t/ is eliminated through a process of debuccalization. In contrast, the more marked segments /k/ and /p/ remain intact; these segments avoid the debuccalization process because they are highly marked and thereby excite greater preservation. Ideas (a) and (b) are formally expressed as a set of constraint-formation conditions. For constraints on output structures (‘markedness’ constraints), if a constraint assigns a violation to an element p in scale S, then the constraint also assigns a violation to every element that is more marked than p in S. An analogous proposal applies to faithfulness (i.e. preservation) constraints: if a faithfulness constraint bans an unfaithful mapping from element p in scale S, then the constraint also bans unfaithful mappings from all elements that are more marked than p in S. The result is that—regardless of the constraints' ranking—more marked elements are both subject to more stringent output conditions and preserved more faithfully than lesser-marked ones. The constraints are also shown to allow distinctions between scale categories to be collapsed. A wide range of phonological phenomena provide evidence for the theoretical proposals, including analyses and typologies of sonority-driven stress (Nganasan, Gujarati, Kiriwina, and Harar Oromo), tone-driven stress, vowel and consonant epenthesis, vowel reduction (Dutch), coda neutralization (Malay and Yamphu), Place assimilation (Catalan, Ponapean, Korean, Swedish, and Sri Lankan Portuguese Creole), and coalescence (Attic Greek and Pāli).
format Text
author de Lacy, Paul Valiant
author_facet de Lacy, Paul Valiant
author_sort de Lacy, Paul Valiant
title The formal expression of markedness
title_short The formal expression of markedness
title_full The formal expression of markedness
title_fullStr The formal expression of markedness
title_full_unstemmed The formal expression of markedness
title_sort formal expression of markedness
publisher ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst
publishDate 2002
url https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI3068550
genre Nganasan*
genre_facet Nganasan*
op_source Doctoral Dissertations Available from Proquest
op_relation https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI3068550
_version_ 1766113900651085824