Defining Views in the Binary Relationship Model.

The Binary Relationship Model has been praised for the way it not only supports, but practically forces us to model the "deep structures" of the information in the conceptual schema. An adverse effect is that the conceptual schems becomes very large. This, combined with the fact that a Bin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mark, Leo
Other Authors: ISR
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: 1987
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1903/4548
id ftunivmaryland:oai:drum.lib.umd.edu:1903/4548
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivmaryland:oai:drum.lib.umd.edu:1903/4548 2023-05-15T16:01:51+02:00 Defining Views in the Binary Relationship Model. Mark, Leo ISR 1987 1167354 bytes application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1903/4548 en_US eng ISR; TR 1987-39 http://hdl.handle.net/1903/4548 Technical Report 1987 ftunivmaryland 2022-11-11T11:12:23Z The Binary Relationship Model has been praised for the way it not only supports, but practically forces us to model the "deep structures" of the information in the conceptual schema. An adverse effect is that the conceptual schems becomes very large. This, combined with the fact that a Binary Relationship Model schema gives a "flat" representation of the information, makes it very hard to distinguish important concepts of a model from its less important details. Furthermore, the length of DML statements is directly proportional to the size of the schema. What we need for practical applications is a way of keeping the "deep structures" while seeing only the "surface structures". We need to be able to define views on a conceptual schema. We need to be able to select and derive from the conceptual schema precisely the concepts we are interested in for each application of our model. Report DML University of Maryland: Digital Repository (DRUM)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Maryland: Digital Repository (DRUM)
op_collection_id ftunivmaryland
language English
description The Binary Relationship Model has been praised for the way it not only supports, but practically forces us to model the "deep structures" of the information in the conceptual schema. An adverse effect is that the conceptual schems becomes very large. This, combined with the fact that a Binary Relationship Model schema gives a "flat" representation of the information, makes it very hard to distinguish important concepts of a model from its less important details. Furthermore, the length of DML statements is directly proportional to the size of the schema. What we need for practical applications is a way of keeping the "deep structures" while seeing only the "surface structures". We need to be able to define views on a conceptual schema. We need to be able to select and derive from the conceptual schema precisely the concepts we are interested in for each application of our model.
author2 ISR
format Report
author Mark, Leo
spellingShingle Mark, Leo
Defining Views in the Binary Relationship Model.
author_facet Mark, Leo
author_sort Mark, Leo
title Defining Views in the Binary Relationship Model.
title_short Defining Views in the Binary Relationship Model.
title_full Defining Views in the Binary Relationship Model.
title_fullStr Defining Views in the Binary Relationship Model.
title_full_unstemmed Defining Views in the Binary Relationship Model.
title_sort defining views in the binary relationship model.
publishDate 1987
url http://hdl.handle.net/1903/4548
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_relation ISR; TR 1987-39
http://hdl.handle.net/1903/4548
_version_ 1766397558874177536