NEKATERI DRUŽBENI VIDIKI KAKOVOSTI ŽIVLJENJA STAROSTNIKOV V RAZLIČNIH OBLIKAH BIVANJA

V teoretičnem delu smo se osredotočili na Maslowo teorijo potreb in na vrednote, pri katerih smo izpostavili kategorizacijo vrednot po Musku. Posebno pozornost smo namenili družini, pri kateri nas je še posebej zanimala njena vloga, element razširjene družine ter družina praznega gnezda. V nadaljeva...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Krošl, Katja
Other Authors: ČAGRAN, BRANKA, Goriup, Jana
Format: Master Thesis
Language:Slovenian
Published: K. Krošl 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=43070
https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=60714&dn=
https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/20220168?lang=sl
id ftunivmaribor:oai:dk.um.si:IzpisGradiva.php-id-43070
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Digital Library of University of Maribor
op_collection_id ftunivmaribor
language Slovenian
topic oblika bivanja
razlogi/vzroki bivanja
prosti čas
osamljenost
stiki
zadovoljstvo
vrednote.
forms of residence
reasons/causes of residence
leisure
loneliness
connections
contentment
values.
info:eu-repo/classification/udc/316.346.32-053.9(043.2)
spellingShingle oblika bivanja
razlogi/vzroki bivanja
prosti čas
osamljenost
stiki
zadovoljstvo
vrednote.
forms of residence
reasons/causes of residence
leisure
loneliness
connections
contentment
values.
info:eu-repo/classification/udc/316.346.32-053.9(043.2)
Krošl, Katja
NEKATERI DRUŽBENI VIDIKI KAKOVOSTI ŽIVLJENJA STAROSTNIKOV V RAZLIČNIH OBLIKAH BIVANJA
topic_facet oblika bivanja
razlogi/vzroki bivanja
prosti čas
osamljenost
stiki
zadovoljstvo
vrednote.
forms of residence
reasons/causes of residence
leisure
loneliness
connections
contentment
values.
info:eu-repo/classification/udc/316.346.32-053.9(043.2)
description V teoretičnem delu smo se osredotočili na Maslowo teorijo potreb in na vrednote, pri katerih smo izpostavili kategorizacijo vrednot po Musku. Posebno pozornost smo namenili družini, pri kateri nas je še posebej zanimala njena vloga, element razširjene družine ter družina praznega gnezda. V nadaljevanju smo se osredotočili na staranje. Starost smo opredelili, izpostavili smo vrste starosti ter teorije staranja. Pozornost smo namenili tudi upokojitvi ter domu upokojencev, pri katerem smo odgovorili na vprašanje, kdaj se starejši človek odloči za dom. Zanimali so nas dejavniki za sprejetje domskega življenja, postopek za sprejem v dom, bivanje v domu ter oskrba. V nadaljevanju smo izpostavili varovana stanovanja. Posebno pozornost pa smo namenili tudi preživljanju prostega časa v starosti, osamljenosti ter ogroženosti starostnikov. V empiričnem delu smo naredili primerjavo med starostniki, ki bivajo s svojci, sami doma, s partnerjem in v domu upokojencev. Osredotočili smo se na razloge/vzroke bivanja, preživljanje prostega časa, občutek osamljenosti in stike s sorodniki, stopnjo zadovoljstva z zdravjem, finančnim stanjem, druženjem, počutjem, ohranjanjem sorodstvenih vezi, preživljanjem prostega časa ter na pomembnost vrednot (dionizične, apolonske). Zanimalo nas je, katera skupina starostnikov je glede na obliko bivanja najbolj ogrožena. Rezultati anketnega vprašalnika so pokazali, da so v primerjavi s starostniki, ki bivajo s svojci ter s partnerjem, v slabšem položaju starostniki, ki bivajo sami doma ter v domu upokojencev. Najbolj ogroženi pa so starostniki, ki bivajo sami doma In the theoretical part we focused on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and on values, among which we stressed categorization of values by Musek. Special focus was dedicated to a family, where we were especially interested in its role, the element of extended family and an empty nest family. In the following we focused on aging. We defined aging and pointed out types and theories of it. Attention was devoted also to retirement and retirement homes, where we answered the question when an elderly decides for a retirement home. We were interested in factors of acceptance of living in a retirement home, procedure to be accepted in one, living in it and retirement home care. Afterwards we pointed out sheltered housing. Special attention was given also to leisure in old age, loneliness and jeopardy of elderly. In the empirical part we did a comparison between elderly who live with their relatives, alone at home, with their partner and in a retirement home. Research was focused on the reasons/causes of residence, leisure, feeling of loneliness and contacts with relatives, degree of satisfaction with their health, financial situation, socializing, welfare, maintaining kinship ties, leisure and the importance of values (Dionysian, Apollonian). We were interested in which group of elderly, according to the form of residence, is the most jeopardized one. The results of questionnaires showed that elderly who live alone at home or in the retirement home, are more at disadvantage compared to elderly who live with their relatives or with their partner. The most jeopardized are elderly who live alone at home.
author2 ČAGRAN, BRANKA
Goriup, Jana
format Master Thesis
author Krošl, Katja
author_facet Krošl, Katja
author_sort Krošl, Katja
title NEKATERI DRUŽBENI VIDIKI KAKOVOSTI ŽIVLJENJA STAROSTNIKOV V RAZLIČNIH OBLIKAH BIVANJA
title_short NEKATERI DRUŽBENI VIDIKI KAKOVOSTI ŽIVLJENJA STAROSTNIKOV V RAZLIČNIH OBLIKAH BIVANJA
title_full NEKATERI DRUŽBENI VIDIKI KAKOVOSTI ŽIVLJENJA STAROSTNIKOV V RAZLIČNIH OBLIKAH BIVANJA
title_fullStr NEKATERI DRUŽBENI VIDIKI KAKOVOSTI ŽIVLJENJA STAROSTNIKOV V RAZLIČNIH OBLIKAH BIVANJA
title_full_unstemmed NEKATERI DRUŽBENI VIDIKI KAKOVOSTI ŽIVLJENJA STAROSTNIKOV V RAZLIČNIH OBLIKAH BIVANJA
title_sort nekateri družbeni vidiki kakovosti življenja starostnikov v različnih oblikah bivanja
publisher K. Krošl
publishDate 2013
url https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=43070
https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=60714&dn=
https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/20220168?lang=sl
genre sami
genre_facet sami
op_source Maribor
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
_version_ 1766184734601248768
spelling ftunivmaribor:oai:dk.um.si:IzpisGradiva.php-id-43070 2023-05-15T18:12:11+02:00 NEKATERI DRUŽBENI VIDIKI KAKOVOSTI ŽIVLJENJA STAROSTNIKOV V RAZLIČNIH OBLIKAH BIVANJA SOME SOCIAL ASPECTS OF QUALITY OF LIFE OF ELDERLY IN DIFFERENT FORMS OF RESIDENCE Krošl, Katja ČAGRAN, BRANKA Goriup, Jana 2013-12-13 application/pdf https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=43070 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=60714&dn= https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/20220168?lang=sl slv slv K. Krošl info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Maribor oblika bivanja razlogi/vzroki bivanja prosti čas osamljenost stiki zadovoljstvo vrednote. forms of residence reasons/causes of residence leisure loneliness connections contentment values. info:eu-repo/classification/udc/316.346.32-053.9(043.2) info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2013 ftunivmaribor 2019-02-03T16:23:56Z V teoretičnem delu smo se osredotočili na Maslowo teorijo potreb in na vrednote, pri katerih smo izpostavili kategorizacijo vrednot po Musku. Posebno pozornost smo namenili družini, pri kateri nas je še posebej zanimala njena vloga, element razširjene družine ter družina praznega gnezda. V nadaljevanju smo se osredotočili na staranje. Starost smo opredelili, izpostavili smo vrste starosti ter teorije staranja. Pozornost smo namenili tudi upokojitvi ter domu upokojencev, pri katerem smo odgovorili na vprašanje, kdaj se starejši človek odloči za dom. Zanimali so nas dejavniki za sprejetje domskega življenja, postopek za sprejem v dom, bivanje v domu ter oskrba. V nadaljevanju smo izpostavili varovana stanovanja. Posebno pozornost pa smo namenili tudi preživljanju prostega časa v starosti, osamljenosti ter ogroženosti starostnikov. V empiričnem delu smo naredili primerjavo med starostniki, ki bivajo s svojci, sami doma, s partnerjem in v domu upokojencev. Osredotočili smo se na razloge/vzroke bivanja, preživljanje prostega časa, občutek osamljenosti in stike s sorodniki, stopnjo zadovoljstva z zdravjem, finančnim stanjem, druženjem, počutjem, ohranjanjem sorodstvenih vezi, preživljanjem prostega časa ter na pomembnost vrednot (dionizične, apolonske). Zanimalo nas je, katera skupina starostnikov je glede na obliko bivanja najbolj ogrožena. Rezultati anketnega vprašalnika so pokazali, da so v primerjavi s starostniki, ki bivajo s svojci ter s partnerjem, v slabšem položaju starostniki, ki bivajo sami doma ter v domu upokojencev. Najbolj ogroženi pa so starostniki, ki bivajo sami doma In the theoretical part we focused on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and on values, among which we stressed categorization of values by Musek. Special focus was dedicated to a family, where we were especially interested in its role, the element of extended family and an empty nest family. In the following we focused on aging. We defined aging and pointed out types and theories of it. Attention was devoted also to retirement and retirement homes, where we answered the question when an elderly decides for a retirement home. We were interested in factors of acceptance of living in a retirement home, procedure to be accepted in one, living in it and retirement home care. Afterwards we pointed out sheltered housing. Special attention was given also to leisure in old age, loneliness and jeopardy of elderly. In the empirical part we did a comparison between elderly who live with their relatives, alone at home, with their partner and in a retirement home. Research was focused on the reasons/causes of residence, leisure, feeling of loneliness and contacts with relatives, degree of satisfaction with their health, financial situation, socializing, welfare, maintaining kinship ties, leisure and the importance of values (Dionysian, Apollonian). We were interested in which group of elderly, according to the form of residence, is the most jeopardized one. The results of questionnaires showed that elderly who live alone at home or in the retirement home, are more at disadvantage compared to elderly who live with their relatives or with their partner. The most jeopardized are elderly who live alone at home. Master Thesis sami Digital Library of University of Maribor