UČITELJSKI NAZIVI IN STROKOVNA RAST UČITELJEV S POUDARKOM NA NARAVOSLOVJU

• Main Author: Lampret, Maja
• Other Authors: Fošnarič, Samo
• Format: Bachelor Thesis
• Language: Slovenian
• Published: M. Lampret 2010
• Subjects: Ključne besede: razredni učitelj; napredovanje; naravoslovje; učiteljski nazivi; mentor; class teacher; promotion; natural science; teachers' titles; mentor.; info:eu-repo/classification/udc/37(043.2); sami
• Online Access: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=13339; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=13466&dn=; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/17505032?lang=sl

V diplomskem delu »Učiteljski nazivi in strokovna rast učiteljev s poudarkom na naravoslovju« sem skozi teoretično izhodišče opredelila kdo je učitelj in kakšne so njegove vloge ter proučila učiteljske nazive. Predstavila sem tudi zgodovino učiteljstva, učiteljev profesionalni razvoj in učiteljske nazive. V empiričnem delu naloge sem ugotavljala kdo učitelje največkrat predlaga za napredovanje v višji naziv, saj menim, da se učitelji za napredovanje v višji naziv pogosto predlagajo sami. Zanimali so me tudi motivi za napredovanje in po katerih področjih učitelji največkrat posegajo, da pridobijo določene točke znotraj tega napredovanja. Rezultati kažejo, da se učitelji največkrat odločajo za družboslovno področje, manj pa za naravoslovna področja. Analiza odgovorov na vprašanje o možnostih za napredovanje iz naravoslovnega področja, je pokazala, da so možnosti za napredovanje iz naravoslovnega področja zmerne oziroma enake glede na ostala predmetna področja. Ugotavljala sem tudi kako na šolah poteka načrtovanje udeležbe v izobraževalnih programih, saj menim, da učitelji sami izbirajo kdaj in pri katerih predmetnih področjih se bodo izpopolnjevali in tako pridobili določene točke, potrebne za svoje napredovanje. Po opravljeni analizi rezultatov sem med drugimi ugotovila tudi, da je večina učiteljev zadovoljnih s tem, da so nazivi stalni. ABSTRACT In theoretical part of my diploma paper Professional titles of teachers and their professional growth with the emphasis on natural science I focused on who the teacher is, what are his roles and I studied teachers' titles. I presented the history of teaching, teacher's professional growth, teacher's titles. The empirical part of my diploma paper is about question: Who nominates the teachers in order to collect the points for promotion to a higher title. In my opinion, in most cases teachers themselves do it. I also wondered what are the motives for the promotion and what are the most wanted fields of research for getting certain points within the promotion. The results show that most teachers decide for sociologic field and a lot less for natural science field. The analysis of the answers about what are the possibilities for promotion within natural science filed showed that the possibilities are moderate or the same according to other fields of research. I also wanted to find out how the planning of participating in educational programmes for teachers is carried out in schools. I think that teachers decide on their own about the time and the filed they will improve their knowledge about in order to get the points that are required for promotion. After analyzing the results I found out that majority of teachers is pleased with the fact that the titles are permanent.