Air-Sea CO2 flux estimates in stratified Arctic coastal waters: How wrong can we be?

Summer near-surface seawater sampling in the Canadian Arctic revealed potential for significant errors (nearly 0.1 μmol·(m-2 s -1)) in CO2 fluxes calculated from measured air-sea CO2 gradients. River runoff and sea ice melt strongly stratify these waters, often resulting in surface mixed layers only...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Miller, Lisa A., Burgers, Tonya, Burt, William, Granskog, Mats, Papakyriakou, Tim
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: AGU 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1993/34875
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080099
id ftunivmanitoba:oai:mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca:1993/34875
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivmanitoba:oai:mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca:1993/34875 2023-06-18T03:38:30+02:00 Air-Sea CO2 flux estimates in stratified Arctic coastal waters: How wrong can we be? Miller, Lisa A. Burgers, Tonya Burt, William Granskog, Mats Papakyriakou, Tim 2020-08-18T06:42:59Z application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1993/34875 https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080099 eng eng AGU Miller, L. A., Burgers, T. M., Burt, W. J., Granskog, M. A., & Papakyriakou, T. N., 2019. Air-Sea CO2 flux estimates in stratified Arctic coastal waters: How wrong can we be? Geophys. Res. Lett. 46: 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080099 http://hdl.handle.net/1993/34875 doi:10.1029/2018GL080099 open access Arctic air-sea carbon dioxide fluxes surface waters ocean stratification Article 2020 ftunivmanitoba https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080099 2023-06-04T17:39:56Z Summer near-surface seawater sampling in the Canadian Arctic revealed potential for significant errors (nearly 0.1 μmol·(m-2 s -1)) in CO2 fluxes calculated from measured air-sea CO2 gradients. River runoff and sea ice melt strongly stratify these waters, often resulting in surface mixed layers only a few meters thick and isolated from waters sampled by shipboard underway systems. Samples collected with the underway system, rosette, and small boats exposed substantial near-surface gradients in CO2 partial pressure (pCO2) over the top 7 m at many stations. Distributions of temperature, salinity, and fluorescence indicated that the sources of the CO2 system gradients varied between stations, precluding simple corrections to align subsurface data with shallower conditions. Overall, the strong summertime sink of atmospheric CO2 implied by the underway data was not supported by shallower data. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation Major Science Initiatives Fund, and the Centre for Ice, Climate and Ecosystems at the Norwegian Polar Institute Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Norwegian Polar Institute Sea ice MSpace at the University of Manitoba Arctic Canada Geophysical Research Letters 46 1 235 243
institution Open Polar
collection MSpace at the University of Manitoba
op_collection_id ftunivmanitoba
language English
topic Arctic
air-sea carbon dioxide fluxes
surface waters
ocean stratification
spellingShingle Arctic
air-sea carbon dioxide fluxes
surface waters
ocean stratification
Miller, Lisa A.
Burgers, Tonya
Burt, William
Granskog, Mats
Papakyriakou, Tim
Air-Sea CO2 flux estimates in stratified Arctic coastal waters: How wrong can we be?
topic_facet Arctic
air-sea carbon dioxide fluxes
surface waters
ocean stratification
description Summer near-surface seawater sampling in the Canadian Arctic revealed potential for significant errors (nearly 0.1 μmol·(m-2 s -1)) in CO2 fluxes calculated from measured air-sea CO2 gradients. River runoff and sea ice melt strongly stratify these waters, often resulting in surface mixed layers only a few meters thick and isolated from waters sampled by shipboard underway systems. Samples collected with the underway system, rosette, and small boats exposed substantial near-surface gradients in CO2 partial pressure (pCO2) over the top 7 m at many stations. Distributions of temperature, salinity, and fluorescence indicated that the sources of the CO2 system gradients varied between stations, precluding simple corrections to align subsurface data with shallower conditions. Overall, the strong summertime sink of atmospheric CO2 implied by the underway data was not supported by shallower data. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation Major Science Initiatives Fund, and the Centre for Ice, Climate and Ecosystems at the Norwegian Polar Institute
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Miller, Lisa A.
Burgers, Tonya
Burt, William
Granskog, Mats
Papakyriakou, Tim
author_facet Miller, Lisa A.
Burgers, Tonya
Burt, William
Granskog, Mats
Papakyriakou, Tim
author_sort Miller, Lisa A.
title Air-Sea CO2 flux estimates in stratified Arctic coastal waters: How wrong can we be?
title_short Air-Sea CO2 flux estimates in stratified Arctic coastal waters: How wrong can we be?
title_full Air-Sea CO2 flux estimates in stratified Arctic coastal waters: How wrong can we be?
title_fullStr Air-Sea CO2 flux estimates in stratified Arctic coastal waters: How wrong can we be?
title_full_unstemmed Air-Sea CO2 flux estimates in stratified Arctic coastal waters: How wrong can we be?
title_sort air-sea co2 flux estimates in stratified arctic coastal waters: how wrong can we be?
publisher AGU
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/1993/34875
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080099
geographic Arctic
Canada
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
genre Arctic
Arctic
Norwegian Polar Institute
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Norwegian Polar Institute
Sea ice
op_relation Miller, L. A., Burgers, T. M., Burt, W. J., Granskog, M. A., & Papakyriakou, T. N., 2019. Air-Sea CO2 flux estimates in stratified Arctic coastal waters: How wrong can we be? Geophys. Res. Lett. 46: 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080099
http://hdl.handle.net/1993/34875
doi:10.1029/2018GL080099
op_rights open access
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080099
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 46
container_issue 1
container_start_page 235
op_container_end_page 243
_version_ 1769003488056967168