Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?

Abstract Background Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) has been an important health promotion tool for over seventy years. The most recent version was released in 2007. This study examined Canadians’ exposure to, knowledge, and use of CFG. Methods Data came from the Canadian Community Health Survey’s Rapid R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Public Health
Main Authors: Slater, Joyce J, Mudryj, Adriana N
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1993/33037
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
id ftunivmanitoba:oai:mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca:1993/33037
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivmanitoba:oai:mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca:1993/33037 2023-06-18T03:40:38+02:00 Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”? Slater, Joyce J Mudryj, Adriana N 2018-06-01T11:41:33Z application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1993/33037 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4 en eng BMC Public Health. 2018 May 22;18(1):652 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4 http://hdl.handle.net/1993/33037 open access The Author(s). Journal Article 2018 ftunivmanitoba https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4 2023-06-04T17:37:10Z Abstract Background Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) has been an important health promotion tool for over seventy years. The most recent version was released in 2007. This study examined Canadians’ exposure to, knowledge, and use of CFG. Methods Data came from the Canadian Community Health Survey’s Rapid Response on the Awareness and Usage of Canada’s Food Guide, which included 10,098 Canadians ≥12 y in all ten provinces. Questions were asked on familiarity, awareness and usage of CFG and Canada’s Food Guide for First Nations, Inuit and Métis, as well as healthy eating principles and behaviours. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to observe counts and differences among key demographic variables. Results More than 80% of Canadians have heard of CFG however significantly more women than men were aware of the Guide. Most knew that ‘Vegetables and Fruit’ had the most recommended servings and that dark green vegetables should be consumed daily; however fewer than half knew this of orange vegetables. Just under one third had a copy in their homes, and the most common sources for obtaining CFG were child’s school and health professional/trainer. Those who consulted CFG recently were more likely to consume the recommended servings of vegetables and fruits, and to state that their eating habits were ‘much better’ than one year previously. Conclusions CFG has “brand recognition” among Canadians however there are gaps between awareness and eating behaviours. The new Food Guide could consider additional dissemination tools including social media, videos and workbooks tailored to various age groups, demographic groups and settings. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations inuit MSpace at the University of Manitoba BMC Public Health 18 1
institution Open Polar
collection MSpace at the University of Manitoba
op_collection_id ftunivmanitoba
language English
description Abstract Background Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) has been an important health promotion tool for over seventy years. The most recent version was released in 2007. This study examined Canadians’ exposure to, knowledge, and use of CFG. Methods Data came from the Canadian Community Health Survey’s Rapid Response on the Awareness and Usage of Canada’s Food Guide, which included 10,098 Canadians ≥12 y in all ten provinces. Questions were asked on familiarity, awareness and usage of CFG and Canada’s Food Guide for First Nations, Inuit and Métis, as well as healthy eating principles and behaviours. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to observe counts and differences among key demographic variables. Results More than 80% of Canadians have heard of CFG however significantly more women than men were aware of the Guide. Most knew that ‘Vegetables and Fruit’ had the most recommended servings and that dark green vegetables should be consumed daily; however fewer than half knew this of orange vegetables. Just under one third had a copy in their homes, and the most common sources for obtaining CFG were child’s school and health professional/trainer. Those who consulted CFG recently were more likely to consume the recommended servings of vegetables and fruits, and to state that their eating habits were ‘much better’ than one year previously. Conclusions CFG has “brand recognition” among Canadians however there are gaps between awareness and eating behaviours. The new Food Guide could consider additional dissemination tools including social media, videos and workbooks tailored to various age groups, demographic groups and settings.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Slater, Joyce J
Mudryj, Adriana N
spellingShingle Slater, Joyce J
Mudryj, Adriana N
Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
author_facet Slater, Joyce J
Mudryj, Adriana N
author_sort Slater, Joyce J
title Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_short Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_full Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_fullStr Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_full_unstemmed Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_sort are we really “eating well with canada’s food guide”?
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/1993/33037
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
genre First Nations
inuit
genre_facet First Nations
inuit
op_relation BMC Public Health. 2018 May 22;18(1):652
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
http://hdl.handle.net/1993/33037
op_rights open access
The Author(s).
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
container_title BMC Public Health
container_volume 18
container_issue 1
_version_ 1769005860551393280