Scripts and information units in future planning: Interactions between a past and a future planning task

Research on future thinking has emphasized how episodic details from memories are combined to create future thoughts, but has not yet examined the role of semantic scripts. In this study, participants recalled how they planned a past camping trip in Australia (past planning task) and imagined how th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cordonnier, Aline, Barnier, Amanda J., Sutton, John
Other Authors: UCL - SSH/IPSY - Psychological Sciences Research Institute
Format: Book Part
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/268349
id ftunivlouvain:oai:dial.uclouvain.be:boreal:268349
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivlouvain:oai:dial.uclouvain.be:boreal:268349 2024-05-12T07:55:54+00:00 Scripts and information units in future planning: Interactions between a past and a future planning task Cordonnier, Aline Barnier, Amanda J. Sutton, John UCL - SSH/IPSY - Psychological Sciences Research Institute 2018 http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/268349 eng eng Routledge boreal:268349 http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/268349 memory future thinking scripts shemas counterfactual thinking info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart 2018 ftunivlouvain 2024-04-17T16:32:11Z Research on future thinking has emphasized how episodic details from memories are combined to create future thoughts, but has not yet examined the role of semantic scripts. In this study, participants recalled how they planned a past camping trip in Australia (past planning task) and imagined how they would plan a future camping trip (future planning task), set either in a familiar (Australia) or an unfamiliar (Antarctica) context. Transcripts were segmented into information units that were coded according to semantic category (e.g., where, when, transport, material, actions). Results revealed a strong interaction between tasks and their presentation order. Starting with the past planning task constrained the future planning task when the context was familiar. Participants generated no new information when the future camping trip was set in Australia and completed second (after the past planning task). Conversely, starting with the future planning task facilitated the past planning task. Participants recalled more information units of their past plan when the past planning task was completed second (after the future planning task). These results shed new light on the role of scripts in past and future thinking and on how past and future thinking processes interact. Book Part Antarc* Antarctica DIAL@UCLouvain (Université catholique de Louvain)
institution Open Polar
collection DIAL@UCLouvain (Université catholique de Louvain)
op_collection_id ftunivlouvain
language English
topic memory
future thinking
scripts
shemas
counterfactual thinking
spellingShingle memory
future thinking
scripts
shemas
counterfactual thinking
Cordonnier, Aline
Barnier, Amanda J.
Sutton, John
Scripts and information units in future planning: Interactions between a past and a future planning task
topic_facet memory
future thinking
scripts
shemas
counterfactual thinking
description Research on future thinking has emphasized how episodic details from memories are combined to create future thoughts, but has not yet examined the role of semantic scripts. In this study, participants recalled how they planned a past camping trip in Australia (past planning task) and imagined how they would plan a future camping trip (future planning task), set either in a familiar (Australia) or an unfamiliar (Antarctica) context. Transcripts were segmented into information units that were coded according to semantic category (e.g., where, when, transport, material, actions). Results revealed a strong interaction between tasks and their presentation order. Starting with the past planning task constrained the future planning task when the context was familiar. Participants generated no new information when the future camping trip was set in Australia and completed second (after the past planning task). Conversely, starting with the future planning task facilitated the past planning task. Participants recalled more information units of their past plan when the past planning task was completed second (after the future planning task). These results shed new light on the role of scripts in past and future thinking and on how past and future thinking processes interact.
author2 UCL - SSH/IPSY - Psychological Sciences Research Institute
format Book Part
author Cordonnier, Aline
Barnier, Amanda J.
Sutton, John
author_facet Cordonnier, Aline
Barnier, Amanda J.
Sutton, John
author_sort Cordonnier, Aline
title Scripts and information units in future planning: Interactions between a past and a future planning task
title_short Scripts and information units in future planning: Interactions between a past and a future planning task
title_full Scripts and information units in future planning: Interactions between a past and a future planning task
title_fullStr Scripts and information units in future planning: Interactions between a past and a future planning task
title_full_unstemmed Scripts and information units in future planning: Interactions between a past and a future planning task
title_sort scripts and information units in future planning: interactions between a past and a future planning task
publisher Routledge
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/268349
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_relation boreal:268349
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/268349
_version_ 1798835780869685248