Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases

This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques
Main Authors: Eerola, Aleksi, Reuchamps, Min
Other Authors: UCL - SSH/SPLE - Institut de sciences politiques Louvain-Europe
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: CAIRN 2016
Subjects:
Deliberative democracy
Iceland
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/190230
https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.077.0319
Description
Summary:This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.

Similar Items