Bed conditions of Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica

• Main Authors: Brisbourne, AM, Smith, AM, Vaughan, DG, King, EC, Davies, D, Bingham, RG, Smith, EC, Nias, IJ, Rosier, SHR
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2017
• Subjects: Pine Island Glacier; West Antarctica; Antarc*; Antarctica; Antarctica Journal; Ice Sheet; Pine Island
• Online Access: http://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3085281/; https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JF004033; http://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3085281/1/Bed%20conditions.pdf

Although 90% of Antarctica's discharge occurs via its fast‐flowing ice streams, our ability to project future ice sheet response has been limited by poor observational constraints on the ice‐bed conditions used in numerical models to determine basal slip. We have helped address this observational deficit by acquiring and analyzing a series of seismic reflection profiles to determine basal conditions beneath the main trunk and tributaries of Pine Island Glacier (PIG), West Antarctica. Seismic profiles indicate large‐scale sedimentary deposits. Combined with seismic reflection images, measured acoustic impedance values indicate relatively uniform bed conditions directly beneath the main trunk and tributaries, comprising a widespread reworked sediment layer with a dilated sediment lid of minimum thickness 1.5 ± 0.4 m. Beneath a slow‐moving intertributary region, a discrete low‐porosity sediment layer of 7 ± 3 m thickness is imaged. Despite considerable basal topography, seismic observations indicate that a till layer at the ice base is ubiquitous beneath PIG, which requires a highly mobile sediment body to maintain an abundant supply. These results are compatible with existing ice sheet models used to invert for basal shear stress: existing basal conditions upstream will not inhibit further rapid retreat of PIG if the high‐friction region currently restraining flow, directly upstream of the grounding line, is breached. However, small changes in the pressure regime at the bed, as a result of stress reorganization following retreat, may result in a less‐readily deformable bed and conditions which are less likely to maintain high ice‐flow rates.