Biological responses of sharks to ocean acidification

Sharks play a key role in the structure of marine food webs, but are facing major threats due to overfishing and habitat degradation. Although sharks are also assumed to be at relatively high risk from climate change due to a low intrinsic rate of population growth and slow rates of evolution, ocean...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biology Letters
Main Authors: Rosa, Rui, Rummer, Jodie L., Munday, Philip L.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Royal Society, The 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10451/41168
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0796
id ftunivlisboa:oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/41168
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivlisboa:oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/41168 2023-05-15T17:50:06+02:00 Biological responses of sharks to ocean acidification Rosa, Rui Rummer, Jodie L. Munday, Philip L. 2020-01-19T20:24:08Z http://hdl.handle.net/10451/41168 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0796 eng eng Royal Society, The https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0796 1744-9561 http://hdl.handle.net/10451/41168 doi:10.1098/rsbl.2016.0796 restrictedAccess sharks behaviour physiology ocean acidification global warming article 2020 ftunivlisboa https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0796 2022-05-25T18:40:01Z Sharks play a key role in the structure of marine food webs, but are facing major threats due to overfishing and habitat degradation. Although sharks are also assumed to be at relatively high risk from climate change due to a low intrinsic rate of population growth and slow rates of evolution, ocean acidification (OA) has not, until recently, been considered a direct threat. New studies have been evaluating the potential effects of end-of-century elevated CO2 levels on sharks and their relatives' early development, physiology and behaviour. Here, we review those findings and use a meta-analysis approach to quantify the overall direction and magnitude of biological responses to OA in the species of sharks that have been investigated to date. While embryo survival and development time are mostly unaffected by elevated CO2, there are clear effects on body condition, growth, aerobic potential and behaviour (e.g. lateralization, hunting and prey detection). Furthermore, studies to date suggest that the effects of OA could be as substantial as those due to warming in some species. A major limitation is that all past studies have involved relatively sedentary, benthic sharks that are capable of buccal ventilation-no studies have investigated pelagic sharks that depend on ram ventilation. Future research should focus on species with different life strategies (e.g. pelagic, ram ventilators), climate zones (e.g. polar regions), habitats (e.g. open ocean), and distinct phases of ontogeny in order to fully predict how OA and climate change will impact higher-order predators and therefore marine ecosystem dynamics. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification Universidade de Lisboa: repositório.UL Biology Letters 13 3 20160796
institution Open Polar
collection Universidade de Lisboa: repositório.UL
op_collection_id ftunivlisboa
language English
topic sharks
behaviour
physiology
ocean acidification
global warming
spellingShingle sharks
behaviour
physiology
ocean acidification
global warming
Rosa, Rui
Rummer, Jodie L.
Munday, Philip L.
Biological responses of sharks to ocean acidification
topic_facet sharks
behaviour
physiology
ocean acidification
global warming
description Sharks play a key role in the structure of marine food webs, but are facing major threats due to overfishing and habitat degradation. Although sharks are also assumed to be at relatively high risk from climate change due to a low intrinsic rate of population growth and slow rates of evolution, ocean acidification (OA) has not, until recently, been considered a direct threat. New studies have been evaluating the potential effects of end-of-century elevated CO2 levels on sharks and their relatives' early development, physiology and behaviour. Here, we review those findings and use a meta-analysis approach to quantify the overall direction and magnitude of biological responses to OA in the species of sharks that have been investigated to date. While embryo survival and development time are mostly unaffected by elevated CO2, there are clear effects on body condition, growth, aerobic potential and behaviour (e.g. lateralization, hunting and prey detection). Furthermore, studies to date suggest that the effects of OA could be as substantial as those due to warming in some species. A major limitation is that all past studies have involved relatively sedentary, benthic sharks that are capable of buccal ventilation-no studies have investigated pelagic sharks that depend on ram ventilation. Future research should focus on species with different life strategies (e.g. pelagic, ram ventilators), climate zones (e.g. polar regions), habitats (e.g. open ocean), and distinct phases of ontogeny in order to fully predict how OA and climate change will impact higher-order predators and therefore marine ecosystem dynamics. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rosa, Rui
Rummer, Jodie L.
Munday, Philip L.
author_facet Rosa, Rui
Rummer, Jodie L.
Munday, Philip L.
author_sort Rosa, Rui
title Biological responses of sharks to ocean acidification
title_short Biological responses of sharks to ocean acidification
title_full Biological responses of sharks to ocean acidification
title_fullStr Biological responses of sharks to ocean acidification
title_full_unstemmed Biological responses of sharks to ocean acidification
title_sort biological responses of sharks to ocean acidification
publisher Royal Society, The
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/41168
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0796
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_relation https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0796
1744-9561
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/41168
doi:10.1098/rsbl.2016.0796
op_rights restrictedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0796
container_title Biology Letters
container_volume 13
container_issue 3
container_start_page 20160796
_version_ 1766156700471001088