Habitat preferences of baleen whales in a mid-latitude habitat

• Published in: Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography
• Main Authors: Prieto, Rui, Tobeña, Marta, Silva, Mónica A.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2020
• Subjects: Environmental niche modeling (ENM); Azores; Mid-Atlantic; Migration; MaxEnt; Niche overlap; Blue whale; Fin whale; Sei whale; Balaenoptera borealis; Balaenoptera musculus; Balaenoptera physalus; baleen whale; baleen whales; Sei Whale
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/41164; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.07.015

Understanding the dynamics of baleen whale distribution is essential to predict how environmental changes can affect their ecology and, in turn, ecosystem functioning. Recent work showed that mid-latitude habitats along migratory routes may play an important role on the feeding ecology of baleen whales. This study aimed to investigate the function of a mid-latitude habitat for blue (Balaenoptera musculus), fin (Balaenoptera physalus) and sei (Balaenoptera borealis) whales occurring in sympatry during spring and summer months and to what extent their environmental niches overlap. We addressed those questions by developing environmental niche models (ENM) for each species and then making pairwise comparisons of niche overlap and relative habitat patch importance among the three species. ENMs were created using sightings from the Azorean Fisheries Observer Program from May to November, between 2004 and 2009, and a set of 18 predictor environmental variables. We then assessed monthly (April–July) overlap among ENMs using a modified Hellinger׳s distance metric (I). Results show that the habitat niches of blue and fin whales are strongly influenced by primary productivity and sea surface temperature and are highly dynamic both spatially and temporally due to the oceanography of the region. Niche overlap analyses show that blue and fin whale environmental niches are similar and that the suitable habitats for the two species have high degree of spatial coincidence. These results in combination suggest that this habitat may function as a mid-latitude feeding ground to both species while conditions are adequate. The sei whale model, on the other hand, did not include variables considered to be proxies for prey distribution and little environmental niche overlap was found between this species and the other two. We argue that these results suggest that the region holds little importance as a foraging habitat for the sei whale. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion