State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems

The personal, commercial, and scientific use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in Antarctica has increased dramatically in recent years. Due to the potential benefits for, and negative impacts to, sensitive Antarctic wildlife, the use of UAS (also called unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), remotely pilot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Biology
Main Authors: Mustafa, Osama, Barbosa, Andrés, Krause, Douglas J., Peter, Hans-Ulrich, Vieira, Gonçalo, Rümmler, Marie-Charlott
Format: Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer 2019
Subjects:
UAV
UAS
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10451/39117
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9
id ftunivlisboa:oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/39117
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivlisboa:oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/39117 2023-05-15T13:36:26+02:00 State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems Mustafa, Osama Barbosa, Andrés Krause, Douglas J. Peter, Hans-Ulrich Vieira, Gonçalo Rümmler, Marie-Charlott 2019-07-16T10:09:35Z http://hdl.handle.net/10451/39117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9 eng eng Springer https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00300-018-2363-9 Mustafa, O., Barbosa, A., Krause, D. J., Peter, H. U., Vieira, G., Rümmler, M. C. (2018). State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems. Polar Biology, 41(11), p. 2387-2398. DOI:10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9. 0722-4060 1432-2056 http://hdl.handle.net/10451/39117 doi:10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9 closedAccess UAV UAS Drone Wildlife monitoring Survey technologies Guidelines contributionToPeriodical 2019 ftunivlisboa https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9 2022-05-25T18:39:56Z The personal, commercial, and scientific use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in Antarctica has increased dramatically in recent years. Due to the potential benefits for, and negative impacts to, sensitive Antarctic wildlife, the use of UAS (also called unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) or drones) is a widely discussed topic. Accordingly, an assessment of the current state of UAS-wildlife response research and recommendations for future work is needed. This paper summarizes recent research and the expert opinion of several national Antarctic science programs in order to support Antarctic conservation policy discussions and inform forthcoming research. It encapsulates the current knowledge on the impact of UAS on Antarctic wildlife and the recommendations of the Action Group (AG) on ‘Development of a satellite-based, Antarctic-wide, remote sensing approach to monitor bird and animal populations’ of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) for the compilation of guidelines. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Polar Biology SCAR Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research Universidade de Lisboa: repositório.UL Antarctic Polar Biology 41 11 2387 2398
institution Open Polar
collection Universidade de Lisboa: repositório.UL
op_collection_id ftunivlisboa
language English
topic UAV
UAS
Drone
Wildlife monitoring
Survey technologies
Guidelines
spellingShingle UAV
UAS
Drone
Wildlife monitoring
Survey technologies
Guidelines
Mustafa, Osama
Barbosa, Andrés
Krause, Douglas J.
Peter, Hans-Ulrich
Vieira, Gonçalo
Rümmler, Marie-Charlott
State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems
topic_facet UAV
UAS
Drone
Wildlife monitoring
Survey technologies
Guidelines
description The personal, commercial, and scientific use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in Antarctica has increased dramatically in recent years. Due to the potential benefits for, and negative impacts to, sensitive Antarctic wildlife, the use of UAS (also called unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) or drones) is a widely discussed topic. Accordingly, an assessment of the current state of UAS-wildlife response research and recommendations for future work is needed. This paper summarizes recent research and the expert opinion of several national Antarctic science programs in order to support Antarctic conservation policy discussions and inform forthcoming research. It encapsulates the current knowledge on the impact of UAS on Antarctic wildlife and the recommendations of the Action Group (AG) on ‘Development of a satellite-based, Antarctic-wide, remote sensing approach to monitor bird and animal populations’ of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) for the compilation of guidelines. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
author Mustafa, Osama
Barbosa, Andrés
Krause, Douglas J.
Peter, Hans-Ulrich
Vieira, Gonçalo
Rümmler, Marie-Charlott
author_facet Mustafa, Osama
Barbosa, Andrés
Krause, Douglas J.
Peter, Hans-Ulrich
Vieira, Gonçalo
Rümmler, Marie-Charlott
author_sort Mustafa, Osama
title State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems
title_short State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems
title_full State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems
title_fullStr State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems
title_full_unstemmed State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems
title_sort state of knowledge: antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems
publisher Springer
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/39117
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Polar Biology
SCAR
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Polar Biology
SCAR
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
op_relation https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00300-018-2363-9
Mustafa, O., Barbosa, A., Krause, D. J., Peter, H. U., Vieira, G., Rümmler, M. C. (2018). State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems. Polar Biology, 41(11), p. 2387-2398. DOI:10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9.
0722-4060
1432-2056
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/39117
doi:10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9
op_rights closedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9
container_title Polar Biology
container_volume 41
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2387
op_container_end_page 2398
_version_ 1766078374928711680