State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems
The personal, commercial, and scientific use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in Antarctica has increased dramatically in recent years. Due to the potential benefits for, and negative impacts to, sensitive Antarctic wildlife, the use of UAS (also called unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), remotely pilot...
Published in: | Polar Biology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/39117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9 |
id |
ftunivlisboa:oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/39117 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivlisboa:oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/39117 2023-05-15T13:36:26+02:00 State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems Mustafa, Osama Barbosa, Andrés Krause, Douglas J. Peter, Hans-Ulrich Vieira, Gonçalo Rümmler, Marie-Charlott 2019-07-16T10:09:35Z http://hdl.handle.net/10451/39117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9 eng eng Springer https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00300-018-2363-9 Mustafa, O., Barbosa, A., Krause, D. J., Peter, H. U., Vieira, G., Rümmler, M. C. (2018). State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems. Polar Biology, 41(11), p. 2387-2398. DOI:10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9. 0722-4060 1432-2056 http://hdl.handle.net/10451/39117 doi:10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9 closedAccess UAV UAS Drone Wildlife monitoring Survey technologies Guidelines contributionToPeriodical 2019 ftunivlisboa https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9 2022-05-25T18:39:56Z The personal, commercial, and scientific use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in Antarctica has increased dramatically in recent years. Due to the potential benefits for, and negative impacts to, sensitive Antarctic wildlife, the use of UAS (also called unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) or drones) is a widely discussed topic. Accordingly, an assessment of the current state of UAS-wildlife response research and recommendations for future work is needed. This paper summarizes recent research and the expert opinion of several national Antarctic science programs in order to support Antarctic conservation policy discussions and inform forthcoming research. It encapsulates the current knowledge on the impact of UAS on Antarctic wildlife and the recommendations of the Action Group (AG) on ‘Development of a satellite-based, Antarctic-wide, remote sensing approach to monitor bird and animal populations’ of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) for the compilation of guidelines. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Polar Biology SCAR Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research Universidade de Lisboa: repositório.UL Antarctic Polar Biology 41 11 2387 2398 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Universidade de Lisboa: repositório.UL |
op_collection_id |
ftunivlisboa |
language |
English |
topic |
UAV UAS Drone Wildlife monitoring Survey technologies Guidelines |
spellingShingle |
UAV UAS Drone Wildlife monitoring Survey technologies Guidelines Mustafa, Osama Barbosa, Andrés Krause, Douglas J. Peter, Hans-Ulrich Vieira, Gonçalo Rümmler, Marie-Charlott State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems |
topic_facet |
UAV UAS Drone Wildlife monitoring Survey technologies Guidelines |
description |
The personal, commercial, and scientific use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in Antarctica has increased dramatically in recent years. Due to the potential benefits for, and negative impacts to, sensitive Antarctic wildlife, the use of UAS (also called unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) or drones) is a widely discussed topic. Accordingly, an assessment of the current state of UAS-wildlife response research and recommendations for future work is needed. This paper summarizes recent research and the expert opinion of several national Antarctic science programs in order to support Antarctic conservation policy discussions and inform forthcoming research. It encapsulates the current knowledge on the impact of UAS on Antarctic wildlife and the recommendations of the Action Group (AG) on ‘Development of a satellite-based, Antarctic-wide, remote sensing approach to monitor bird and animal populations’ of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) for the compilation of guidelines. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Mustafa, Osama Barbosa, Andrés Krause, Douglas J. Peter, Hans-Ulrich Vieira, Gonçalo Rümmler, Marie-Charlott |
author_facet |
Mustafa, Osama Barbosa, Andrés Krause, Douglas J. Peter, Hans-Ulrich Vieira, Gonçalo Rümmler, Marie-Charlott |
author_sort |
Mustafa, Osama |
title |
State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems |
title_short |
State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems |
title_full |
State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems |
title_fullStr |
State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems |
title_sort |
state of knowledge: antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems |
publisher |
Springer |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/39117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9 |
geographic |
Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Polar Biology SCAR Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Polar Biology SCAR Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research |
op_relation |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00300-018-2363-9 Mustafa, O., Barbosa, A., Krause, D. J., Peter, H. U., Vieira, G., Rümmler, M. C. (2018). State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems. Polar Biology, 41(11), p. 2387-2398. DOI:10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9. 0722-4060 1432-2056 http://hdl.handle.net/10451/39117 doi:10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9 |
op_rights |
closedAccess |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9 |
container_title |
Polar Biology |
container_volume |
41 |
container_issue |
11 |
container_start_page |
2387 |
op_container_end_page |
2398 |
_version_ |
1766078374928711680 |